Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

CrPC Section 464. Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge


 
Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Criminal Laws Code of Criminal Procedure 1973
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
02 01-04-1974 35
Chapter Title Ministry Department
Irregular Proceedings Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Internal Security

(1) No finding sentence or order by a court of competent jurisdiction shall be deemed invalid merely on the ground that no charge was framed or on the ground of any error, omission or irregularity in the charge including any misjoinder of charge, unless, in the opinion of the court of appeal, confirmation or revision, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby.

(2) If the court of appeal, confirmation or revision is of opinion that a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned, it may-

(a) In the case of an omission to frame a charge, order that a charge be framed and that the trial be recommenced from the point immediately after the framing of the charge.

(b) In the case of an error, omission or irregularity in the charge, direct a new trial to be had upon a charge framed in whatever manner it thinks fit:

Provided that if the court is of opinion that the facts of the case are such that no valid charge could be preferred against the accused in respect of the facts proved, it shall quash the conviction.

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on CrPC Section 464. Effect of omission to frame, or absence of, or error in, charge

Rohtas Vs. State of Haryana, 2020 Latest Caselaw 655 SC MALA SINGH & ORS. Vs STATE OF HARYANA, 2019 Latest Caselaw 114 SC Kamil Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2018 Latest Caselaw 811 SC Bhim Singh & ANR. Vs. State of Uttarakhand [February 11, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 98 SC Union of India & Ors. Vs. Ex-Gnr Ajeet Singh [APRIL 2, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 239 SC Mohan Singh Vs. State of Bihar, 2011 Latest Caselaw 626 SC Rafiq Ahmed @ Rafi Vs. State of U.P., 2011 Latest Caselaw 578 SC Abdul Sayeed Vs. State of M.P. [2010] INSC 739 (14 September 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 673 SC Balraje @ Trimbak Vs. State of Maharashtra [2010] INSC 381 (10 May 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 374 SC Dumpala Chandra Reddy Vs. Nimakayala Balireddy & Ors. [2008] INSC 1112 (14 July 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 615 SC Virendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P [2007] Insc 43 (16 January 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 43 SC Gurpreet Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2005] Insc 633 (9 November 2005), 2005 Latest Caselaw 630 SC Dalbir Singh Vs. State of U.P [2004] Insc 239 (8 April 2004), 2004 Latest Caselaw 236 SC Sohan Lal @ Sohan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [2003] INSC 520 (14 October 2003), 2003 Latest Caselaw 514 SC Lallan Rai & Ors Vs. State of Bihar [2002] INSC474 (14 November 2002), 2002 Latest Caselaw 475 SC State of A.P., Edla Bhoom Reddy Vs. Thakkidiram Reddy & Ors, State of Andhra Pradesh [1998] INSC 407 (11 August 1998), 1998 Latest Caselaw 407 SC Dr. Jai Shanker Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh [1972] INSC 201 (30 August 1972), 1972 Latest Caselaw 201 SC