Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

CrPC Section 167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours.


 
Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Criminal Laws Code of Criminal Procedure 1973
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
02 01-04-1974 12
Chapter Title Ministry Department
Information to the Police and their Power to Investigate Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Internal Security

(1) Whenever any person is arrested and detained in custody, and it appears that the investigation cannot be completed within the period of twenty-four hours fixed by section 57, and there are grounds for believing that the accusation or information is wellfounded, the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation, if he is not below the rank of sub-inspector, shall forthwith transmit to the nearest Judicial Magistrate a copy of the entries in the diary hereinafter prescribed relating to the case, and shall at the same time forward the accused to such Magistrate.
(2) The Magistrate to whom an accused person is forwarded under this section may, whether he has or has not jurisdiction to try the case, from time to time, authorise the detention of the accused in such custody as such Magistrate thinks fit, for a term not exceeding fifteen days in the whole; and if he has no jurisdiction to try the case or commit it for trial, and considers further detention unnecessary, he may order the accused to be forwarded to a Magistrate having such jurisdiction:
Provided that
1 (a) the Magistrate may authorise the detention of the accused person, otherwise than in custody of the police, beyond the period of fifteen days, if he is satisfied that adequate grounds exist for doing so, but no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person in custody under this paragraph for a total period exceeding
(i) ninety days, where the investigation relates to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years;
(ii) sixty days, where the investigation relates to any other offence, and, on the expiry of the said period of ninety days, or sixty days, as the case may be, the accused person shall be released on bail if he is prepared to and does furnish bail, and every person released on bail under this sub-section shall be deemed to be so released under the provisions of Chapter XXXIII for the purposes of that Chapter;
2 (b) no Magistrate shall authorise detention of the accused in custody of the police under this section unless the accused is produced before him in person for the first time and subsequently every time till the accused remains in the custody of the police, but the Magistrate may extend further detention in judicial custody on production of the accused either in person or through the medium of electronic video linkage;
(c) no Magistrate of the second class, not specially empowered in this behalf by the High Court, shall authorise detention in the custody of the police.
3 Explanation I.For the avoidance of doubts, it is hereby declared that, notwithstanding the expiry of the period specified in paragraph (a), the accused shall be detained in custody so long as he does not furnish bail.
4 Explanation II.If any question arises whether an accused person was produced before the Magistrate as required under clause (b), the production of the accused person may be proved by his signature on the order authorising detention or by the order certified by the Magistrate as to production of the accused person through the medium of electronic video linkage, as the case may be.
5 Provided further that in case of a woman under eighteen years of age, the detention shall be authorised to be in the custody of a remand home or recognised social institution.
6 (2A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation, if he is not below the rank of a sub-inspector, may, where a Judicial Magistrate is not available, transmit to the nearest Executive Magistrate, on whom the powers of a Judicial Magistrate or Metropolitan Magistrate have been conferred, a copy of the entry in the diary hereinafter prescribed relating to the case, and shall, at the same time, forward the accused to such Executive Magistrate, and thereupon such Executive Magistrate, may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, authorise the detention of the accused person in such custody as he may think fit for a term not exceeding seven days in the aggregate; and, on the expiry of the period of detention so authorised, the accused person shall be released on bail except where an order for further detention of the accused person has been made by a Magistrate competent to make such order; and, where no order for such further detention is made, the period during which the accused person was detained in custody under the orders made by an Executive Magistrate under this sub-section, shall be taken into account in computing the period specified in paragraph (a) of the proviso to sub-section (2):
Provided that before the expiry of the period aforesaid, the Executive Magistrate shall transmit to the nearest Judicial Magistrate the records of the case together with a copy of the entries in the diary relating to the case which was transmitted to him by the officer in charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation, as the case may be.
(3) A Magistrate authorising under this section detention in the custody of the police shall record his reasons for so doing.
(4) Any Magistrate other than the Chief Judicial Magistrate making such order shall forward a copy of his order, with his reasons for making it, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
(5) If in any case triable by a Magistrate as a summons-case, the investigation is not concluded within a period of six months from the date on which the accused was arrested, the Magistrate shall make an order stopping further investigation into the offence unless the officer making the investigation satisfies the Magistrate that for special reasons and in the interests of justice the continuation of the investigation beyond the period of six months is necessary.
(6) Where any order stopping further investigation into an offence has been made under sub-section (5), the Sessions Judge may, if he is satisfied, on an application made to him or otherwise, that further investigation into the offence ought to be made, vacate the order made under sub-section (5) and direct further investigation to be made into the offence subject to such directions with regard to bail and other matters as he may specify.


1. Subs. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 13, for paragraph (a) (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).
2. Subs. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 14, for cl. (b) (w.e.f. 31-12-2009)
3. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 13 (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).
4. Subs. by Act 5 of 2009, s.14, for Explanation II (w.e.f. 31-12-2009)
5. Ins. by Act 5 of 2009, s.14 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
6. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s.13 (w.e.f. 18-12-1978). 

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on CrPC Section 167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours.

VENKATESAN BALASUBRAMANIYAN vs. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, 2020 Latest Caselaw 611 SC TOFAN SINGH vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU, 2020 Latest Caselaw 582 SC M RAVINDRAN vs. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, 2020 Latest Caselaw 569 SC SARAVANAN vs. STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 2020 Latest Caselaw 563 SC BIKRAMJIT SINGH vs. STATE OF PUNJAB, 2020 Latest Caselaw 549 SC MUKESH SINGH vs. STATE (NARCOTIC BRANCH OF DELHI), 2020 Latest Caselaw 485 SC UNION OF INDIA vs. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA, 2020 Latest Caselaw 476 SC S. KASI vs. STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TAMIL NADU, 2020 Latest Caselaw 408 SC SUSHILA AGGARWAL vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI), 2020 Latest Caselaw 94 SC SUJIT TIWARI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT, 2020 Latest Caselaw 84 SC HOME SECRETARY (PRISON) vs. H. NILOFER NISHA, 2020 Latest Caselaw 69 SC KHAJA BILAL AHMED vs. STATE OF TELANGANA, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1293 SC MANOHARAN vs. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1079 SC Pradeep Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand, 2019 Latest Caselaw 527 SC Achpal @ Ramswaroop & another Vs. State of Rajasthan [September 24, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 683 SC Krishnakant Tamrakar Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [MARCH 28, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 224 SC Rambeer Shokeen Vs. State of NCT of Delhi [January 31, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 57 SC Rakesh Kumar Paul Vs. State of Assam [August 16, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 574 SC Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Rathin Dandapat and others [August 21, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 543 SC Narendra Kumar Amin Vs. CBI & Ors. [January 15, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 38 SC R.N.Agarwal Vs. R.C. Bansal and others [October 14, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 654 SC Union of India through C.B.I. Vs. Nirala Yadav @ Raja Ram Yadav @ Deepak Yadav [June 30, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 402 SC Sundeep Kumar Bafna Vs. State of Maharashtra & ANR. [March 27, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 197 SC Dilip Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [APRIL 16, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 315 SC Vipul Shital Prasad Agarwal Vs. State of Gujarat & ANR. [November 6, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 634 SC Medha Kotwal Lele and Others Vs. Union of India and Others [October 19, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 612 SC Yumman Ongbi Lembi Leima Vs. State of Manipur & Ors. [January 04, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 3 SC Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2011 Latest Caselaw 731 SC Devender Kumar & ANR Etc. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. Etc. [2010] INSC 352 (5 May 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 342 SC Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat [2009] INSC 964 (6 May 2009), 2009 Latest Caselaw 486 SC

Click here to view all Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on CrPC Section 167. Procedure when investigation cannot be completed in twenty-four hours.