International News | Latest laws

Home / International News

International-news

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister disqualified as Member of Parliament for holding UAE Work Permit

April 26, 2018

Man jailed for 8 Months for repeatedly showing finger to Speed Cameras

April 24, 2018

No-sympathy-for-Terrorista-Pic-Courtsey-ctvnews.ca_

Paris Attacker gets 20 years over Terror charges in a Bloody Gun-Battle with Police

April 24, 2018

Airline Passenger fined for 500 Dollars for carrying an Free Airline Apple through US Customs

April 24, 2018

To save Human Lives, Scientists develop worm-like Robots for Earthquake rescue operations

April 21, 2018

National Flag torn by Protesters in London: India expresses ‘deep anguish’, seeks legal action

April 20, 2018

In US, Nanny who killed kids while parents were away convicted of Murder

April 20, 2018

Iran arrests its Culture Ministry official for Dance

Iran arrests its Culture Ministry official over public dance event

April 19, 2018

German Court rules that online ad blocker Applications are Legal

April 19, 2018

Ex Judge and his Wife convicted with Jail Sentence and Fine for torturing child servant in Pakistan

April 17, 2018

China launches website for nabbing its corrupt officials

China launches website for its Citizens to report corrupt officials and foreign spies

April 16, 2018

Bullets fired at Pakistan Supreme Court Judge’s Residence, who was part of the Bench which disqualified Nawaz Sharif

April 15, 2018

Pakistan’s Supreme Court disqualifies Former CM Nawaz Sharif from holding office for Life

April 13, 2018

Pakistan’s Natl. Assembly Speaker directs Interior Ministry to crackdown on blasphemous material being posted about Hindu religion

April 12, 2018

FBI raids Prez Trump’s Personal Lawyer, Prez Trump tweets: “Attorney-Client privilege is dead! A Total Witchhunt”

April 10, 2018

Patent Infringement: BlackBerry sues Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and Snapchat, alleges copying of features from BB Messenger

April 9, 2018

South Korea’s Former President jailed for 24 years for Corruption, in a live broadcast of the judgment for the 1st time in South Korea

April 8, 2018

China declares Trade War on US, imposes heavy tariffs on 128 US Exports items

April 3, 2018

This US Couple gets married at the Supermarket where they met first

April 3, 2018

Snooping through spouse phone now offence

Saudi Arabia notifies new Law punishes snooping through spouse’s phone with Jail

April 3, 2018

British Govt. to ban sale of Ivory Articles

British Govt. to bring law banning Ivory sales to protect Elephants, ‘British Raj’ Ivory Articles to be Exempted

April 3, 2018

Coffee Woes: US Judge directs Starbucks to put a Cancer warning on Coffee sold in California

March 30, 2018

China’s Serial Killer dubbed as “Jack the Ripper”, sentenced to death for Rape & Murder of 11 Female victims

March 30, 2018

Name Dispute: Greece & Macedonia amicably reach settlement

March 30, 2018

Page 1 of 212 »

KERALA AYURVEDA PARAMPARYA VAIDYA FORUM Vs. STATE OF KERALA

Travancore-Cochin Literary, Scientific and Charitable Societies Registration Act, 1955 - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970. we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was right in dismissing the petitions filed by the appellants herein. Consequently, the appeals fail and are accordingly dismissed. Interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly. However, the parties are left to bear their own costs.

R.K. Agrawal and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.

13/4/2018 View judgement PDF

M/S OSWAL WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. Vs. M/S OSWAL AGRO MILLS LTD.

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940, Section 20. we do not find any infirmity or error in the approach and judgments passed by the courts below. There is no merit in this appeal and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

R.K. Agrawal and R. Banumathi, JJ.

13/4/2018 View judgement PDF

SHIVA KANT JHA Vs. UNION OF INDIA

Constitution of India, Article 32. we dispose of the petition filed by the writ petitioner.

R.K. Agrawal and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

13/4/2018 View judgement PDF

D. SARAVANAN Vs. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER TANGEDCO TNEB DISTRIBUTION CIRCLE

Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code, 2004. The appeal is disposed of with the following directions: (1) The respondents are directed to consider the application of the appellant treating it to be registered with effect from 21.03.2011, i.e., the date it was resubmitted. (2) The appellant shall resubmit a fresh demand draft of L 550/- which was returned by the respondent on 20.02.2017. (3) The respondents may process the application and intimate within a period of three months about any further fee or other requirements which need to be complied with by the appellant for the purpose.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

12/4/2018 View judgement PDF

STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. UTILITY USERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

Electricity Act, 2003, Sections 62, 64 and 86 - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11. The appeals as well as the other transferred cases stand disposed of accordingly leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

J. Chelameswar and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.

12/4/2018 View judgement PDF

ASOK PANDE Vs. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Constitution of India, Article 32 - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Some of the averments which have been made by the petitioner are scandalous. However, we have considered it appropriate to allow the matter to rest with a caution that the petitioner must be more responsible for the manner in which he seeks to draft pleadings in future filings. we find no merit in the petition. The writ petition is dismissed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

11/4/2018 View judgement PDF

A.P INDUSTRIAL INF. CORP. LTD Vs. S.N RAJ KUMAR

Companies Act, 1956 - Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 54 - Registration Act, 1908 - Specific Relief Act, 1963. it is not necessary to deal with the argument as to whether doctrine of proportionality is applicable in the instant case or not. It is to be borne in mind, as rightly held by the High Court, that the appellant-Corporation had withdrawn the action of cancellation of the plots. Instead, it demanded 50% of the prevailing market value in lump sum towards the cost of the plots. There is no legal basis for such a demand, more so, after the registration of the sale deeds in favour of the respondents thereby transferring the ownership in these plots in their favour. As a result, all the appeals are dismissed with costs.

A.K. Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, JJ.

10/4/2018 View judgement PDF

BAXIS SINGH Vs. SUKHDEV SINGH (D) THR LRS .

Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Sections 88 and 183. The appeal is devoid of merit and is hereby dismissed without any order as to costs.

N.V. Ramana and S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ.

10/4/2018 View judgement PDF

CHOTANBEN Vs. KIRITBHAI JALKRUSHNABHAI THAKKAR

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Orders XIII and XVI - Evidence Act, Sections 67 and 71 - Constitution of India, Article 136. This appeal succeeds and is allowed, with no order as to costs.

Dipak Misra, CJI., A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

10/4/2018 View judgement PDF

SARSWATI SINGH Vs. SHAILESH SINGH

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32. The petitioners deposited a sum of L 35 lakhs. Out of the said amount, a sum of L 25 lakhs was withdrawn by the respondents. A balance of L 10 lakhs is lying in deposit with the Registry which was invested in a fixed deposit. The aforesaid amounts were directed to be deposited by this Court in order to test the bona fides of the petitioners. Now that the writ petition has been dismissed, we find merit in the application of the petitioners, that they are entitled to a refund of the amount of L 35 lakhs and the return of the title deeds deposited in this Court. Consequently, we direct that the amount of L 10 lakhs (out of the above mentioned amount of L 35 lakhs) which is lying in deposit with the Registry shall be returned to the petitioners together with the accrued interest. The respondents shall refund an amount of L 25 lakhs which was withdrawn by them in pursuance of the interim directions, to the petitioners within a period of three weeks hence. The petitioners shall also be entitled to return of the title deeds deposited in the Registry. The MA shall stand disposed of.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

10/4/2018 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

International-news

Get Latest Laws News Alert