Home / International News

International News

Latest Laws aims to provide most informative, useful, reliable and handy resource of International News for Judicial officers, Legal professionals, Law students/researchers and general public.

Know Why more than 1500 Workers of Nawaz Sharif’s Party, his Younger Brother and Former PM Abbasi were booked by Police?

July 15, 2018

Gulab Singh Shaheen, First Sikh Traffic Police Officer of Pakistan

Know Why Pakistan’s First Sikh Cop was Assaulted, Kicked Out of his Lahore Home?

July 13, 2018

10,000 Police officers deployed in Lahore ahead of Convict Nawaz Sharif’s arrival in Pakistan

July 13, 2018

‘Dancing isn’t a crime’: World Dance’s in support of Maedeh Hojabri who was arrested for posting Dance video on Instagram

July 10, 2018

Former Pakistan PM Nawaz Sharif sentenced to 10 years of Imprisonment in Corruption Case

July 6, 2018

US mother arrested of selling her Son, was trying to sell two minor Daughters as well

July 5, 2018

I am not a ‘Dictator’ who will run away from Courts, says Ex Prime Minister of Pakistan Nawaz Sharif

July 5, 2018

Indian-origin Lawyer named as Acting Head of Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) by US Prez Trump’s Administration

July 4, 2018

Know why a Man paid his No Parking Challan after waiting for 44 Years?

July 3, 2018

Inspired by Hollywood-flick, Gangster breaks out of jail in Filmy style in Hijacked Helicopter

July 2, 2018

Indian-Origin man with Paranoid Schizophrenia jailed in UK for Homicide

July 1, 2018

Indian-American Judge among Donald Trump’s list of Judges to replace US Supreme Court Judge, Justice Kennedy

June 29, 2018

Sole Paris Attacks Suspect Abdeslam justifies 2015 killings in a rare statement before Investigators

June 29, 2018

After 7 years of Patent Battle, Apple and Samsung call it truce, settle for an undisclosed amount

June 28, 2018

US Supreme Court upholds Trump Administration’s Travel Ban targeting Several Muslim Dominant Countries

June 26, 2018

Two Indian-Americans charged for defrauding US Postal Service of atleast 16 Million Dollars

June 26, 2018

Sharing of Fake News proving deadly in India: BBC Investigative Report

June 26, 2018

London mayor Sadiq Khan condemns UK’s visa policy towards Indian Students, terms it ‘offensive’

June 25, 2018

Know how a used Restaurant napkin helps solve 32-year-old Murder mystery

June 25, 2018

US President Trump: Migrants who ‘invade’ US have no Right to due process of Law

June 25, 2018

As the World’s Last remaining Country lifts Ban on Driving, Women steer their cars through busy streets

June 24, 2018

International Court of Justice (ICJ) to hear Iran’s dispute with USA over Billions in Frozen Assets

June 23, 2018

US Supreme Court: Police need a Court-approved Warrant to get access to Criminal Suspects past Locations

June 23, 2018

Cambridge honours Nobel Laureate Venkatraman Ramakrishnan for his contributions to Medical Research

June 22, 2018

Page 1 of 612 3 4 5 » ...Last »

M. AAMIRA FATHIMA AND ORS. Vs. ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

Annamalai University Act, 1928 - Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Collection of Capitation Fee) Act, 1992 - State Legislature vide Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Collection of Capitation Fee) Amendment Act, 2007. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 26.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No.1637 of 2014 and other connected matters. Matter arising from Writ Appeal No.1637 of 2014 which in turn arose from Writ Petition No.20720 of 2014, namely M. Aamira Fathima and others v. Annamalai University and others is taken to be the lead matter and the facts leading to the filing of the said writ appeal are set out in detail hereunder. Appeal allowed.

Arun Mishra and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

13/7/2018 View judgement PDF

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR Vs. M/S GWALIOR JHANSI EXPRESSWAY LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR

Appeal emanates from the decision of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 21st August, 2017 in Appeal ARB.A (Comm.) No.20 of 2017 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, \"the Act\") seeking to quash the order dated 24th May, 2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 of the Act came to be dismissed. The Arbitral Tribunal vide order dated 24th May, 2017 allowed the application preferred by the respondent (claimant) under Section 17 of the Act seeking a direction to the appellant to allow the respondent to exercise an option to match the lowest bid in terms of the order dated 23rd July, 2016 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal and including to exercise Right of First Refusal (\"ROFR\") and for other consequential reliefs. Appeal allowed.

Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ.

13/7/2018 View judgement PDF

PARAKH VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. BAROMA AGRO PRODUCT

Appeal arises out of the order dated 01.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in AOPT No.349 of 2016 affirming the order of the Single Judge in and by which it was held that the respondent-defendant is entitled to use the word \'MALABAR\' in conjunction with the mark \'BAROMA\' for selling its product - Biryani Rice. By the impugned order, the Division Bench has also affirmed the findings of the Single Judge that subject to the outcome of the suit, the respondents can pursue their application for registration of their label. Appeal dismissed.

Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ.

12/7/2018 View judgement PDF

OM PRAKASH SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR

Criminal Procedure Code, Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, Section 420, 406, 379, 448, 307, 427 and 506 read with Section 34. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.10.2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 52088/2013 allowing the petition filed by respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has set aside the order dated 10.09.2013 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, Bihar in Siwan (M) P.S. Case No. 288/2012, taking cognizance of the offence under Section 420/406/379/448/307/427 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused-respondent nos. 2 and 3 herein. Appeal disposed of.

N.V. Ramana and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

N.N. GODFRED Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.( FOR RESPONDENT NO. 2

Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Section 30 - Navy (Pension) Regulations, 1964, Regulation 86. The present Civil Appeal has been filed under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 to challenge the judgment and order dated February 25, 2010 passed by the Principal Bench of the Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi. Appeal allowed.

S. Abdul Nazeer and Indu Malhotra, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

HETAL CHIRAG PATEL Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Appeals filed against the common final judgment and order dated 29.06.2018 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Civil Application No.3 of 2018 in F/LPA No.36 of 2018 in SCA No.11163 of 2012 & other allied matters. The Division Bench dismissed the applications filed by the appellants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeals holding inter alia that there was no sufficient cause made out by the appellants in filing the appeals which were delayed by 233 days. Appeal allowed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

11/7/2018 View judgement PDF

MOTIRAM PADU JOSHI Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Indian Penal Code, Sections Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 30.07.2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.174 of 1994 in and by which the High Court reversed the judgment of the acquittal of the appellants/accused Nos. 3, 5, 7 and 8 and convicted them under Sections 147, 148, 302 read with 149 IPC and sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment. Appeal dismissed.

Ranjan Gogoi and R. Banumathi, JJ.

10/7/2018 View judgement PDF

K.K. JHA KAMAL Vs. JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Respondent-Jharkhand High Court initiated proceedings against the appellant under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and convicted him for the offence of criminal contempt and sentenced him to undergo sentence of simple imprisonment for six months. There was also a direction to the Bar Council of India to take appropriate action against the appellant. It was made clear that until the appellant purged with the contempt, he would not be entitled to practise under the jurisdiction of the respondent-High Court, except for the chamber practice. Appeal partly allowed.

Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.

10/7/2018 View judgement PDF

DR. P.V. RAMANA Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

The appellants are before us, aggrieved by the order dated 06.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.4153/2017. The appeal disposed of.

Kurian Joseph and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.

6/7/2018 View judgement PDF

LALIT YADAV Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Indian Penal Code, Section 228-A. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 376 IPC and Section 342 IPC and sentenced to substantive sentences of seven years and one year respectively. His conviction and sentence has been affirmed by the High Court by dismissing present appeal. We do not see any reason to upset the orders of conviction and sentence and as such this petition stands dismissed.

Abhay Manohar Sapre and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.

5/7/2018 View judgement PDF

Latest CaseLaw

International News

Get Latest Laws News Alert