Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

CrPC Section 197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants


 
Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Criminal Laws Code of Criminal Procedure 1973
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
02 01-04-1974 14
Chapter Title Ministry Department
Conditions Requisite For Initiation Of Proceeding Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Internal Security

(1) When any person who is or was a Judge or Magistrate or a public servant not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the Government is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, no Court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction 1 [save as otherwise provided in the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 (1 of 2014)]—

(a) in the case of a person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the Union, of the Central Government;

(b) in the case of a person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of a State, of the State Government:

2 [Provided that where the alleged offence was committed by a person referred to in clause (b) during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in a State, clause (b) will apply as if for the expression “State Government” occurring therein, the expression “Central Government” were substituted.]

3 [Explanation.—For the removal of doubts it is hereby declared that no sanction shall be required in case of a public servant accused of any offence alleged to have been committed under section 166A, section 166B, section 354, section 354A, section 354B, section 354C, section 354D, section 370, section 375, section 376, section 376A, section 376C, section 376D or section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860).]

(2) No Court shall take cognizance of any offence alleged to have been committed by any member of the Armed Forces of the Union while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

(3) The State Government may, by notification, direct that the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply to such class or category of the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order as may be specified therein, wherever they may be serving, and thereupon the provisions of that sub-section will apply as if for the expression "Central Government" occurring therein, the expression "State Government" were substituted.

4 [(3A) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), no court shall take cognizance of any offence, alleged to have been committed by any member of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order in a State while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force therein, except with the previous sanction of the Central Government.

(3B) Notwithstanding anything to the Contrary contained in this Code or any other law, it is hereby declared that any sanction accorded by the State Government or any cognizance taken by a court upon such sanction, during the period commencing on the 20th day of August, 1991 and ending with the date immediately preceding the date on which the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1991 (43 of 1991), receives the assent of the President, with respect to an offence alleged to have been committed during the period while a Proclamation issued under clause (1) of article 356 of the Constitution was in force in the State, shall be invalid and it shall be competent for the Central Government in such matter to accord sanction and for the court to take cognizance thereon.]

(4) The Central Government or the State Government, as the case may be, may determine the person by whom, the manner in which, and the offence or offences for which, the prosecution of such Judge, Magistrate or public servant is to be conducted, and may specify the Court before which the trial is to be held.

______________________________

1. Ins. by Act 1 of 2014, s. 58 and the Schedule (w.e.f. 16-1-2014).

2. Added by Act 43 of 1991, s. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991).

3. Explanation ins. by Act 13 of 2013, s. 19 (w.e.f. 3-2-2013).

4. Ins. by Act 43 of 1991, s. 2 (w.e.f. 2-5-1991).

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on CrPC Section 197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants

Jayant Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, 2020 Latest Caselaw 639 SC M/S FERTICO MARKETING AND INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, 2020 Latest Caselaw 607 SC ASHOO SURENDRANATH TEWARI vs. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, 2020 Latest Caselaw 498 SC D. DEVARAJA vs. OWAIS SABEER HUSSAIN, 2020 Latest Caselaw 400 SC NISHA PRIYA BHATIA vs. SHASHI PRABHA, 2020 Latest Caselaw 324 SC STATION HOUSE OFFICER CBI/ACB/BANGALORE vs. B.A. SRINIVASAN, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1204 SC KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD vs. B. HEERA NAIK, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1153 SC Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Others vs. Pramod V. Sawant And Another, 2019 Latest Caselaw 735 SC S.K. Miglani Vs. State NCT of Delhi, 2019 Latest Caselaw 443 SC Devendra Prasad Singh Vs. State of Bihar, 2019 Latest Caselaw 332 SC K.K. Mishra Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & ANR. [APRIL 13, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 266 SC Manju Surana Vs. Sunil Arora & Ors. [March 27, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 207 SC Dr. Subhash Kashinath Mahajan Vs The State of Maharashtra and ANR. [MARCH 20, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 191 SC Dr. Babu Ram Saksena Vs. The State [1950] INSC 9 (5 May 1950), 1950 Latest Caselaw 9 SC L. Narayana Swamy Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. [September 06, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 642 SC Surinderjit Singh Mand & ANR. Vs. State of Punjab & ANR. [JULY 05, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 461 SC Punjab State Warehousing Corp. Vs. Bhushan Chander & ANR. [June 29, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 426 SC Amal Kumar Jha Vs. State of Chhatisgarh & ANR. [April 26, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 314 SC Devinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab through CBI [April 25, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 307 SC Prof. N.K. Ganguly Vs. CBI New Delhi [November 19, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 753 SC International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials (ARCI) & Ors. Vs. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd. & ANR. [September 22, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 627 SC State of Rajasthan Vs. Jainudeen Shekh and ANR. [August 25, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 558 SC Nanjappa Vs. State of Karnataka [July 24, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 476 SC D. T. Virupakshappa Vs. C. Subash [April 27, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 331 SC Inspector of Police and another Vs. Battenapatla Venkata Ratnam and another [April 13, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 296 SC Vinod Chandra Semwal Vs. Special Police Establishment, Ujjain [FEBRUARY 24, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 142 SC State of Punjab Vs. Labh Singh [December 17, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 794 SC Rajib Ranjan & Ors. Vs. R. Vijaykumar [October 14, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 656 SC Chandan Kumar Basu Vs. State of Bihar [JULY 7, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 433 SC Kushalbhai Ratanbhai Rohit & Ors. Vs. The State of Gujarat [May 6, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 337 SC

Click here to view all Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on CrPC Section 197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants