Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

CrPC Section 360. Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition


 
Category of Bare Act Name of the Act Year of Promulgation
Criminal Laws Code of Criminal Procedure 1973
Act Number Enactment Date Chapter Number
02 01-04-1974 27
Chapter Title Ministry Department
The Judgment Ministry of Home Affairs Department of Internal Security

(1) When any person not under twenty-one years of age is convicted of an offence punishable fine, or with imprisonment for a term of seven years or less, or when any person under twenty-one years of age or any woman is convicted of an offence not Punishable with death or imprisonment for life, and no previous conviction is proved against the offender, if it, appears to the court before which he is convicted, regard being had to the age, character or antecedents of the offender, and to the circumstances in which the offence was committed, that it is expedient that the offender should be released on probation of good conduct, the court may, instead of sentencing, him at once to any Punishment, direct that he be released on his entering into a bond, with or without sureties to appear and receive sentence when called upon during such period (not exceeding three years) as the Court may direct and in the meantime to keep the peace find be of’ good behaviour :

Provided that where first offender is convicted by a Magistrate of the second class not specially empowered by the High Court, and the Magistrate is of opinion that the powers conferred by this section should be exercised, he shall record his opinion to that effect. and submit the proceedings to a Magistrate of the first class forwarding the accuses to or taking, bail for his appearance before, such Magistrate, who shall dispose of the case in the manner provided by sub-section (2).

(2) Where proceeding are submitted to the Magistrate of the 1st class as provided in sub-section (1), such Magistrate may thereupon pass such sentence or make such order as he might have passed or made if the case had originally been heard by him, and if thinks further inquiry or additional evidence on any point to be necessary, he may make such inquiry or take such evidence himself or direct such inquiry or evidence to be made or taken.

(3) In any case in which a person is convicted of theft, theft in a building, dishonest misappropriation, cheating or any offence under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) punishable with not more than two years imprisonment or any offence punishable with fine only and no previous conviction is proved against him, the court before which he is so convicted may, if it thinks fit, having regard to the age, character, antecedents or physical or mental condition of the offender and to the trivial nature of the offence or any extenuating circumstances under which the offence was committed, instead of sentences him to any punishment, release him after due admonition.

(4) An order under this section may be made by any Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its power of revision.

(5) When an order has been made under this section in respect of any offender, the High Court or Court of Session may, on appeal when there is a right of appeal to such court, or when exercising its powers of revision, set aside such order, and in lieu thereof pass sentence on such offender according to law:

Provided that the High Court or Court of Session shall not under this sub-section inflict a greater punishment than might have been inflicted by the court by which the offender was convicted.

(6) The provisions of sections 121, 124 and 373 shall, so far as may be apply in the case of sureties offered in pursuance of the provisions of this section.

(7) The court, before directing the release of an offender under sub-section (1) shall be satisfied that an offender or his surety (if any) has a fixed place of abode or regular occupation in the place for which the court acts or in which the offender is likely to live during the period named for the observance of the conditions.

(8) If the court, which convicted the offender, or a court which could have dealt with the offender in respect of his original offence, is satisfied that the offender has failed to observe any of the conditions of his recognizance, it may issue a warrant for his apprehension.

(9) An offender, when apprehended on any such warrant, shall be brought forthwith before the court issuing the warrant, and such court may either remand him in custody until the case is heard or admit him to bail with a sufficient surety conditioned on his appearing for sentence and such court may after hearing the case, pass sentence.

(10) Nothing in this section shall affect the provisions of the Probation of offenders Act, 1958 (20 of 1958), or the Children Act, 1960 (60 of 1960), or any other law for the time being in force for the treatment, training or rehabilitation of youthful offenders.

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on CrPC Section 360. Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition

Nanak Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan [February 26, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 132 SC Birju Vs. State of M.P. [February 14, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 92 SC Hazara Singh Vs. Raj Kumar & Ors. [APRIL18, 2013], 2013 Latest Caselaw 328 SC Ushaben Vs. Kishorbhai Chunilal Talpada and Others [March 23, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 192 SC Halappa & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka [2009] INSC 1439 (13 August 2009), 2009 Latest Caselaw 685 SC Sarju @ Ramu Vs. State of U.P. [2009] INSC 1419 (7 August 2009), 2009 Latest Caselaw 665 SC Eliamma & ANR. Vs. State of Karnataka [2009] INSC 273 (11 February 2009), 2009 Latest Caselaw 178 SC State of M.P. & Ors. Vs. Madhukar Rao [2008] INSC 32 (9 January 2008), 2008 Latest Caselaw 32 SC Mohd. Yaseen Vs. State of U.P. [2007] Insc 741 (17 July 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 539 SC Gulzar Vs. State of M.P [2007] Insc 5 (4 January 2007), 2007 Latest Caselaw 5 SC The State Vs. A. Parthiban [2006] Insc 634 (9 October 2006), 2006 Latest Caselaw 634 SC Daljit Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab Through Secretary Home Affairs [2006] Insc 455 (27 July 2006), 2006 Latest Caselaw 455 SC Sattan Sahani Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [2002] INSC 421 (1 October 2002), 2002 Latest Caselaw 422 SC N.M. Parthasarathy Vs. State by S.P.E [1992] INSC 19 (21 January 1992), 1992 Latest Caselaw 19 SC Hari Kishan & ANR Vs. Sukhbir Singh & Ors [1988] INSC242 (25 August 1988), 1988 Latest Caselaw 240 SC Ved Prakash Vs. State of Haryana [1980] INSC 214 (12 November 1980), 1980 Latest Caselaw 214 SC Satto & Ors Vs. State of U.P [1979] INSC 90 (26 April 1979), 1979 Latest Caselaw 90 SC Dilbag Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1979] INSC 20 (25 January 1979), 1979 Latest Caselaw 20 SC Prem Ballab & ANR Vs. The State (Delhi Administration) [1976] INSC 220 (15 September 1976), 1976 Latest Caselaw 220 SC L.D. Healy Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [1968] INSC 299 (27 November 1968), 1968 Latest Caselaw 299 SC Chhadami Lal Jain & Ors Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another [1959] INSC 115 (14 September 1959), 1959 Latest Caselaw 115 SC Narayan Rao Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh [1957] INSC 60 (15 July 1957), 1957 Latest Caselaw 60 SC Magga & ANR Vs. The State of Rajasthan [1953] INSC 9 (16 February 1953), 1953 Latest Caselaw 9 SC Bhagwan Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab [1952] INSC 25 (30 April 1952), 1952 Latest Caselaw 25 SC