Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
NEELAM GUPTA VS. MAHIPAL SHARAN GUPTA

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 352 SC

Headnote :

The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12 - Right to reside in matrimonial home - Application for modification - The appellant wife was granted a protection order and allowed to live in the matrimonial home. The son of the respondent husband’s first wife initiated a part...
BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED vs. PRADEEP MEHRA

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 353 SC

Headnote :

The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Section 4(3) addresses gratuity entitlement. The respondent was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer of the appellant company under specified terms, which included eligibility for gratuity as per legal provisions. After resigning, the respondent claimed gratuit...
PILCOM vs. C.I.T WEST BENGAL-VII

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 354 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 115BBA, 194E, and 195(2), addresses tax deduction at source. The Assessee in this case is the PAK-INDO-LANKA Joint Management Committee, which was established by the Cricket Control Boards of Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka to organize the World Cup C...
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III vs. M/S UNI PRODUCTS INDIA LTD.

Judgement Date : 01 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 355 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEExcise Duty - Car Matting and Carpets - Chapter 57 encompasses not only carpets but also various other types of floor coverings.A. Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 38A - Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Chapter 57, First Schedule - Car matting - Is it classified as a carpet? Chapter 57 includ...
PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE vs. VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED

Judgement Date : 05 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 356 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe recovery process outlined in Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act applies to Cooperative Banks.The Reserve Bank of India exercises significant and comprehensive control over primary credit societies engaged in banking activities.Co-operative banks, whether established under State legislation or...
CLP INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 357 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 43A of the Electricity Act, 2003, regarding the supply of electricity and tariff, the parties entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) that specifically referenced the notification dated 30.03.1992. The PPA stipulated that for the first Kwh/KW, a plant load factor of 68.5% woul...
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. ATMANAND SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 358 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn cases where a writ petition presents complex factual questions, the High Court should refrain from considering such petitions.According to Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, regarding writ jurisdiction and the exercise of power, when a petition involves intricate factual issue...
HUKUM CHAND DESWAL vs. SATISH RAJ DESWAL

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 359 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Court Act, 1971, Sections 12 and 14, along with the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975, Rule 3, address contempt of court issues. In this case, the defendant vacated the suit premises before the date set by the Court. However, the plaintiff\'s conte...
KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 360 SC

Headnote :

The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act of 1976, specifically Sections 22(1)(a) and 21, addresses surplus land and exemptions. In this case, the appellant\'s excess land was acquired by the State, which issued a notice and took possession as documented in a possession panchnama. The appellants c...
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU KAKINADA vs. M/S GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 361 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe High Court cannot overlook the statutory time frame for addressing grievances and cannot automatically accept a writ petition.A. Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Assessment - Challenge - Limitation - The petitioner opted to approach the High Court after t...
RATNAGIRI NAGAR PARISHAD vs. GANGARAM NARAYAN AMBEKAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 362 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 41(f) and (h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000, the issue of land allocation for a waste disposal project arises. The plaintiff initiated a lawsuit to prevent the defendants from commencing the Solid Waste Disposa...
BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION vs. ARUN KUMAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 364 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn the context of assessing candidates for recruitment to public services, the scope of judicial review is limited.A. Candidate Evaluation - Judicial Review - When it comes to the assessment of candidates, especially for public service recruitment, the scope of judicial review is restricted....
TRILOKI NATH SINGH vs. ANIRUDH SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 365 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe prohibition under Order 23, Rule 3A regarding the challenge of a decree based on a compromise between the parties also extends to individuals who are not part of the compromise proceedings. This rule aims to prevent multiple litigations.A. According to the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or...
SOUTH EAST ASIA MARINE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. OIL INDIA LIMITED

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 366 SC

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 34, addresses the annulment of arbitral awards and the interpretation of arbitral agreements. In this case, a contract was formed between the parties as part of a tender issued by the respondent for drilling wells and related operations. After re...
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEUMS, JAIPUR vs. ASHISH GAUTAM

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 367 SC

Headnote :

The National Green Tribunal Act of 2010, Section 22, states that the Department of Archaeology has designated the monument \"Sisodia Rani ka Bagh\" as a protected site through a notification. This monument has historically hosted ceremonies such as weddings and other events. It features exquisite fo...
FOUNDATION FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 368 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEThe Court has ordered the formation of a Special Committee to assess the possibility of implementing faster internet services, specifically 3G and 4G, in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.According to the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules...
JAGMAIL SINGH vs. KARAMJIT SINGH

Judgement Date : 13 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 369 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTTo admit secondary evidence, foundational evidence must be provided explaining why the original evidence is unavailable.According to the Evidence Act of 1872, Sections 65 and 66, secondary evidence can only be permitted if primary evidence has been established. Secondary evidence serves as...
WORKMEN THROUGH THE CONVENER FCI LABOUR FEDERATION vs. RAVUTHAR DAWOOD NASEEM

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 370 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTContempt - No contempt proceedings can be initiated based solely on a general directive to regularize and departmentalize the relevant workers.According to Article 129 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, failure to comply with the d...
ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

KAVITA KANWAR vs. MRS. PAMELA MEHTA

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 372 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe absence of a written statement from the defendant does not automatically result in a judgment favoring the plaintiff without the necessity of proving fundamental facts.In probate matters, the proponent must satisfy the Court\'s conscience by eliminating any suspicious circumstances.A. Und...
CANARA BANK vs. M/S LEATHEROID PLASTICS PVT LTD.

Judgement Date : 20 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 374 SC

Headnote :

Indira Benerjee, J.A. Bihar Service Code, 1952, Rule 73 - Bihar Pension Rules 1950, Rule 57 - Retirement - Determination of maximum length of service - The Appellant was appointed at approximately 15 years of age. At the time of the Appellant\'s appointment, there was no minimum age requirement for...
PATEL ENGINEERING LTD. vs. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.

Judgement Date : 22 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 375 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAn arbitral award may be annulled under Section 34 if it is clearly illegal or irrational.According to the Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34 and 37, petitions for reviewing judgments are not entertained. An arbitral award can...
OMBIR SINGH vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 376 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALDelay in submitting FIR to magistrate - No basis for acquitting the accused.A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157 - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 in conjunction with Section 34 - Murder - Delay in submitting FIR - The FIR was received by the Chief Judicial Magistrate\'s office...
ALAPATI JYOTSNA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 377 SC

Headnote :

Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - Writ petition - Request for the respondents to implement \"single counselling\" for the allocation of seats in Post Graduate Medical Courses leading to Degrees and Diplomas, as well as seats in Diplomate of National Board Courses. Given that the petiti...
GURUNANAK INDUSTRIES, FARIDABAD vs. AMAR SINGH (D)

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 378 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTDistinction between `retirement of a partner\' and `dissolution of a partnership firm\' - When there are only two partners and one decides to retire, this effectively results in the dissolution of the firm.A. According to the Partnership Act of 1932, Sections 37 and 48 - There is a clear di...
GOPAL PRASAD vs. BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD

Judgement Date : 28 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 380 SC

Headnote :

Indira Benerjee, J.A. Bihar Service Code, 1952, Rule 73 - Bihar Pension Rules 1950, Rule 57 - Retirement - Determination of maximum length of service - The Appellant was appointed at approximately 15 years of age. At the time of the Appellant\'s appointment, there was no minimum age requirement for...
SONU @ SUNIL vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Judgement Date : 29 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 381 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe essence of Section 34 of the IPC and the foundational principle of criminal liability for the actions of another is the shared or common intention to commit an offense.A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 394, 460, and 302 in conjunction with Section 34 of the Evidence Act, 1872...
TELANGANA STATE SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED vs. M/S SRIGDHAA BEVERAGES

Judgement Date : 01 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 382 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEUnder the Electricity Act, the auction buyer is responsible for settling the electricity debts of the previous owner.According to Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the auction purchaser is liable for the electricity dues of the previous owner. It has been determined that in the case of...
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU vs. STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Judgement Date : 03 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 384 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
CrPC Section 162. Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence
CrPC Section 164. Recording of confessions and statements
CrPC Section 233. Entering upon defence
CrPC Section 460. Irregularities, which do not vitiate proceedings
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 107. Abetment of a thing
IPC Section 108. Abettor
IPC Section 109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment
IPC Section 114. Abettor present when offence is committed
IPC Section 116. Abetment of offence punishable with imprisonment-if offence be not committed
IPC Section 120A. Definition of criminal conspiracy.
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy
IPC Section 141. Unlawful assembly
IPC Section 142. Being member of unlawful assembly
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 201. Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 347. Wrongful confinement to extort property, or constrain to illegal act
IPC Section 359. Kidnapping
IPC Section 362. Abduction
IPC Section 364. Kidnapping or abducting in order to murder
IPC Section 365. Kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine person
IPC Section 387. Putting person in fear of death or of grievous hurt, in order to commit extortion
IPC Section 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

Sucha Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2001] INSC 164 (22 March 2001)
The Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Rajamundry Vs. Duncan Agro Industries Ltd. & Ors [2000] INSC 408 (7 August 2000)
M.O. Shamsudhin Vs. State of Kerala [1995] INSC 188 (21 March 1995)
Willie (William) Slaney Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1955] INSC 60 (31 October 1955)

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn cases of abduction followed by murder, there is a presumption that the abductor is also the murderer.Abetment is a substantive offense, and the punishment for it varies based on different circumstances.There is a discrepancy between Sections 114 and 133; thus, it would be unwise to convict...
STATE OF ORISSA vs. M/S B.ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS LTD.

Judgement Date : 05 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 385 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 366(29A) and the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, Section 5(2)(AA) pertain to work contracts and the reimbursement of taxes. A contractor company sought reimbursement for sales tax imposed on works contracts based on Clause 45.2 of the General Conditions of Contra...
RAMNATH AND CO. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Judgement Date : 05 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 386 SC

Headnote :

A. Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80O - Royalty from foreign enterprises - Deduction - Purpose of the provisions - The aim is to encourage Indian industries to provide intellectual property or information related to industrial, commercial, or scientific knowledge to foreign nations, thereby increasing...
M/S. SHAKTI BHOG FOOD INDUSTRIES LTD. vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 05 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 387 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe issue of whether a suit is barred by limitation is typically a combination of factual and legal questions.A. Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11 - Dismissal of plaint - Order 7, Rule 11 of the CPC grants the Court significant authority to dismiss a plaint if it is clear from the...
ADDISSERY RAGHAVAN vs. CHERUVALATH KRISHNADASAN

Judgement Date : 08 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 388 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe High Court cannot interfere with findings of fact while exercising its revisional jurisdiction.According to Sections 11(8) and 20 of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, regarding bona fide requirements for tenant eviction, the Trial Court granted an eviction applicat...
SRI ANTHONY ALIAS ANTHONY SWAMY vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC

Judgement Date : 10 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 389 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALPhysical Disability - When a claimant has a 75% physical disability that permanently prevents them from engaging in their usual occupation or any similar work, it is challenging to understand the rationale behind compensating based on the disability affecting the entire body.Motor Vehicles Ac...
BIKRAM CHATTERJI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 10 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 390 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950, concerning litigation related to a housing project, there was an issue of misjoinder of parties. The NBCC was appointed as the Project Management Consultant to oversee the completion of various projects and was authorized to issue tenders and p...
NIRBHAY KUMAR vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Judgement Date : 11 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 391 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32 - Regarding the appointment to the position of Sub-Inspector of Police, the claim for equal treatment with 133 candidates who were appointed without undergoing a physical test, but who did undergo a medical test, was addressed. It was determined that the s...
FICUS PAX PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 12 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 392 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTEmployers are not required to pay wages to their employees for the duration that their businesses are closed due to the lockdown.According to the Disaster Management Act, 2005, Section 10(2)(l) - Regarding the full payment of wages to employees during the lockdown, it has been determined th...
M.H. UMA MAHESHWARI vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.

Judgement Date : 12 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 393 SC

Headnote :

The Motor Vehicles Act of 1988, Section 166, addresses compensation for death resulting from an accident, specifically regarding loss of dependency. In this case, the deceased was 50 years and 3 months old at the time of the accident. The applicable multiplier was not correctly applied, as the High...
VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 15 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 394 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTAgricultural land governed by the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act cannot be transferred through a will.According to Sections 43 and 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the validity of testamentary transfers of agricultural land is in question. Even though a...
WARAD MURTI MISHRA vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Judgement Date : 15 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 395 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTSeniority - The question of whether individuals selected in later selection processes, who passed the departmental examination within the required timeframe, should be considered senior to the Appellant, who was appointed earlier but passed the exam after the deadline, has been referred to...
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION, TAMIL NADU vs. K. BASKARAN

Judgement Date : 15 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 396 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALStamp duty - The appellate authority is empowered to increase the market value of a property when reviewing an appeal submitted by registrants if any clear illegality is identified.If the authority requests any information, records, or inputs, this alone does not constitute a delegation of es...
SAVITHA vs. M/S CHODAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURNACE COMPANY

Judgement Date : 16 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 397 SC

Headnote :

The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 addresses compensation for death in accidents. In this case, the appellant was involved in a bus accident caused by a lorry that collided with the bus recklessly and negligently. The appellant sustained nine injuries, seven of which were serious. However, th...
SANGITA ARYA vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Judgement Date : 16 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 398 SC

Headnote :

According to Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in the case of a death resulting from an accident, the income tax returns (ITRs) for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07, submitted before the deceased\'s passing, indicate an annual in...
SIRI CHAND vs. SURINDER SINGH

Judgement Date : 17 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 399 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe clause regarding annual rent increases in a month-to-month tenancy is a contingent clause that applies only if the tenancy extends beyond one year. This clause should not be interpreted to imply that the tenancy was for a duration exceeding one year.A. According to Section 13 of the Eas...
D. DEVARAJA vs. OWAIS SABEER HUSSAIN

Judgement Date : 18 Jun 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 400 SC

Headnote :

A. According to Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and Section 170 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, obtaining government sanction is essential for prosecuting a police officer for actions related to their official duties. This requirement is crucial to shield police officers from fa...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter