Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Sir Hukumchand & Mannalal Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madhya Pradesh [1966] INSC 1 (4 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Headnote :

The Income-tax Officer revoked the renewal certificate of the appellant-firm\'s registration under rule 6B of the Income-tax Rules, citing that the firm was not genuine. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal, and the High Court, upon reference, determined that no appeal could be made ag...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Punjab Vs. M/S. Chander Bhan Harbhajan Lal [1966] INSC 2 (4 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Headnote :

The assessee-firm, made up of 14 partners, sought registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922. One of the partners, G, was also a partner in another firm known as the Ferozepore firm, which had 8 partners. They had an agreement stating that if any work was conducted by any partner wit...
Ram Gopal Reddy Vs. Additional Custodian Evacuee Property, Hyderabad [1966] INSC 3 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 3 SC

Headnote :

The appellant acquired a parcel of land from an individual named A in 1946.Despite the land being valued at over Rs. 100, no registered sale deed was executed. In 1949, A was declared an evacuee, prompting the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Property to issue a notice to the appellant, asking him to exp...
K. V. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. P. N. Venkatasubramania Iyer & Ors [1966] INSC 4 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 4 SC

Headnote :

In 1932, the appellant renewed a promissory note that his brother had executed in 1930 in favor of N, the father of the respondents, for Rs. 1,000. This promissory note was subsequently renewed in 1937, 1940, and 1944, covering the principal amount along with interest. The last three promissory note...
Ramesh & ANR Vs. Seth Gendalal Motilal Patni & Ors [1966] INSC 5 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Headnote :

In the proceedings under section 19(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950, the Claims Officer determined, upon the appellant\'s application, that the debt owed to P, the first respondent, was a secured debt, even though a decree had alr...
Commssioner of Income-Tax, Bombay,South Poona Vs. Murlidhar Jhawar & Purna Ginning And Pressing Factory, Dhar [1966] INSC 6 (7 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 07 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

M, P, and G engaged in business across various commodities, and during the assessment year 1954-55, the Income-Tax Officer assessed a third share of Rs. 51,280 as profits from the business for each of the three individuals. Subsequently, the officer requested M to file a return for the \"income of t...
Gowlibuddanna Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mysore, Bangalore [1966] INSC 7 (10 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Headnote :

B, along with his wife, two unmarried daughters, and the appellant, who was B\'s adopted son, formed a Hindu undivided family. During his lifetime, B was assessed as the manager of this family concerning the income generated from their dealings. After B\'s death, for the assessment year 1951-52, the...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City Vs. Tata Locomotive & Engineering Co. Ltd. [1966] INSC 8 (13 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 13 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Headnote :

The assessee was a limited company based in Bombay, primarily engaged in manufacturing locomotive boilers and locomotives. To facilitate this, the company procured plant and machinery from various countries, including the U.S.A. It appointed M/s. Tata Inc., New York, as its purchasing agent in the U...
Sheodan Singh Vs. Smt. Daryao Kunwar [1966] INSC 9 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 9 SC

Headnote :

The appellant initiated two lawsuits in the Civil Judge\'s Court: one seeking a declaration of his ownership of the disputed property and the other for additional reliefs. While these cases were ongoing, the respondent filed two lawsuits in the Munsif\'s Court against the appellant, asserting joint...
The Roman Catholic Mission Vs. State of Madras & ANR [1966] INSC 10 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Headnote :

The lands in question were granted as inam for the purpose of performing puja in a Devasthanam. Due to their alienation, the Revenue Divisional Officer, acting under section 44B of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act of 1926, resumed and regranted these lands to the Devasthanam, determining th...
Smt. Dayawati & ANR Vs. Inderjit & Ors [1966] INSC 11 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Headnote :

The trial court awarded the appellants interest exceeding 7.5% in a mortgage case against the respondents. The respondents then approached the High Court, where they had an ongoing appeal against the trial court\'s decree, along with a petition under Section 3 of the Usurious Act, 1918, as amended b...
Sastri Yagnapurushadji & Ors Vs. Muldas Brudardas Vaishya & ANR [1966] INSC 12 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 12 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, known as Satsangis and followers of the Swaminarayan sect, initiated a representative lawsuit:(i) seeking a declaration that the pertinent sections of the Bombay Harijan Temple Entry Act, 1947, as amended by Act 77 of 1948, were inapplicable to their temples, arguing that the Swamina...
The State of Bihar Vs. Rambalak Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 13 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 13 SC

Headnote :

The individual, who was detained under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, submitted a petition to the High Court seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The High Court subsequently issued an order granting the individual interim bail.In the appeal to this Court regarding that order, the appellant...
Gulam Yasin Khan Vs. Shri Sahebrao Yeshwantrao Walaskar & Ors [1966] INSC 14 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and respondent No. 1 were candidates for election to the Municipal Committee of Malkapur.During the scrutiny process, respondent No. 1 raised an objection against the appellant\'s candidacy, claiming that the appellant was disqualified under section 15(1) of the Central Provinces & Ber...
Katra Educational Society Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1966] INSC 15 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act of 1860, operated an educational institution in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. The management of the society\'s affairs was assigned to an Executive Committee, composed solely of society members, as outlined in the memorandum of as...
Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Kerala [1966] INSC 16 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

In calculating the total earned income of the appellant company for the calendar year 1959, the Income Tax Officer rejected a deduction claim of Rs. 80,255 related to the company\'s liability for tax payments under the Wealth Tax Act, 27 of 1957. This decision was upheld on appeal by the Appellate A...
Godawari S. Parulekar & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra [1966] INSC 17 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was held in detention starting from November 1962 under various orders. She was released on February 4, 1964, but immediately upon her release, she was served with a new detention order dated February 3, 1963, issued by the State Government under rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules,...
M. V. Krishnan Nambissan Vs. State of Kerala [1966] INSC 18 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who managed a dairy farm, faced charges under sections 7 and 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, in conjunction with rule 44 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. He was accused of selling skimmed thick buttermilk that was found to be adulterate...
Everest Apartments Co-Operative Housingsociety Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1966] INSC 19 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a registered co-operative Housing Society under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Respondent no. 4, S, sought membership in the society, but his application was denied. He appealed to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies under section 23(2) of the Act, who...
K. G. Khosla & Co. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxies [1966] INSC 20 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The appellant entered into a contract with the Director General of Civil Supplies in New Delhi for the supply of axle bodies produced by its principals in Belgium. The goods were inspected in Belgium on behalf of the buyers, but according to the contract, they could be rejected after further inspect...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala & Ors Vs. M/S. Shahzada Nand & Sons & Ors [1966] INSC 21 (19 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 19 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

On March 26, 1954, the Income-tax authorities issued a notice to the respondents under section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the assessment year 1945-46. The assessment resulting from this notice was annulled by the appellate authorities on the basis that the notice under s...
Navinchandra Babubhai Nagarsheth & Ors Vs. Bombay Revenue Tribunal & Ors [1966] INSC 22 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were shareholders in Inam villages. Following the abolition of Inams under the Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1953, they sought compensation for their Inam as per section 17(1) of the Act. Section 17(5) states, \"Nothing in this section shall entitle any person to compensation o...
Addanki Narayanappa & ANR Vs. Bhaskara Krishtappa And 13 Ors [1966] INSC 23 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

The members of two Joint Hindu families (the Appellants and the Respondents) formed a partnership to conduct business. In 1949, the members of one family initiated a lawsuit seeking the dissolution of the partnership and an accounting of its affairs. The members of the other family contended that th...
Kehar Singh & Ors Vs. Dewan Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 24 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The revenue authorities approved the transfer of lands bequeathed by S, an Aulakh Jat from Tehsil Ajnala in Amritsar District, to the appellants, who were S\'s collaterals in the 8th degree. The respondents filed a lawsuit for possession of these lands, asserting their claim as descendants of K. The...
Rao Nihalkaran Vs. Ramgopal [1966] INSC 25 (27 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 27 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who holds an inam in Madhya Pradesh, issued a notice to his tenant, the respondent, terminating the tenancy on the grounds of wanting the land for personal cultivation, and subsequently filed a suit for eviction. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant. However, during the app...
Amar Singh & Ors Vs. Rana Balbahadur Singh [1966] INSC 26 (27 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 27 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

In 1936, certain ryotwari lands owned by the respondent\'s estate in Madhya Bharat were leased for cultivation to the appellants\' father, M, by the Court of Wards, which managed the estate. After the Court of Wards released the estate in 1951, the respondent ended the tenancy and filed a lawsuit se...
Mohd. Raza Dabstani Vs. State of Bombay & Ors [1966] INSC 27 (28 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 28 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, originally from Iran, moved to India in 1938. In 1945, he acquired an Iranian passport and traveled to Iraq for pilgrimage. Upon returning to India, he was registered as an Iranian national under the Registration of Foreigners Act of 1939. On May 25, 1951, he received a retail permit...
Girdharilal Amratlal Shodan & Ors Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors [1966] INSC 28 (28 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 28 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Headnote :

If a notification issued under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is deemed invalid, the Government has the authority to consider it ineffective and can issue a new notification under section 6 in its stead.Section 48 of the Act does not prevent the Government from taking this action. The a...
Maqbool Alam Khan Vs. Mst. Khodaija & Ors [1966] INSC 29 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

The Maharaja of Dumraon initiated a rent lawsuit against several co-sharers of certain lands under his tenure, which were subsequently sold at an execution sale to an individual named L.N, the widow of one of the original co-sharers, filed a title suit (No. 127 of 1939) claiming that her share in th...
S. Rama Iyer Vs. Sundarasa Ponnapoondar [1966] INSC 30 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, who claimed to be the cultivating tenant of the appellant, submitted an application to the Revenue Court under section 3(3) of the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955. He sought a declaration that the amount he had deposited in court was the correct rent owed to the appel...
Smt. Shyam Kishori Devi Vs. Patna Municipal Corporation & ANR [1966] INSC 31 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Headnote :

Following the dissolution of the Patna Municipality, the State Government issued a notification appointing a Municipal officer to carry out the responsibilities and powers of the Commissioner as outlined in section 107 of the Bihar and Orissa Municipal Act, 1922. According to section 117, any applic...
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. R. B. Agarwal [1966] INSC 32 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 32 SC

Headnote :

If a defendant is found guilty by the trial court and subsequently has that conviction overturned by the High Court on appeal, the State has the right to request a certificate from the High Court under Article 134(1)(c). Such a request cannot be dismissed outright on the grounds of incompetence; it...
Surendra Nath Bibra Vs. Stephen Court Ltd. [1966] INSC 33 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

Headnote :

The appellant entered into a 21-year lease for a flat owned by the respondent, which included 3 bedrooms, at a monthly rent of Rs. 350. However, since the respondent only provided access to 2 bedrooms, the appellant decided to stop paying rent entirely. In response, the respondent initiated a lawsui...
Pandit Sri Chand & Ors Vs. M/S. Jagdish Parshad Kishan Chand [1966] INSC 34 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 34 SC

Headnote :

The first respondent initiated a lawsuit against the second respondent to recover money. Following a court order that required the second respondent to provide security for the potential satisfaction of any decree against him, three appellants, along with two others, acted as sureties, agreeing to b...
Yelamanchili Siva Panchakshamma Godavaru Vs. Yalamanchili Cheva Abhayi & Ors [1966] INSC 35 (4 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 35 SC

Headnote :

The respondent submitted a plaint seeking ownership of the properties listed in Schedules A and B, asserting that he was adopted by the appellant, the widow of L. In addition to the adoption claim, the respondent argued that he was named as persona designata in L\'s will. The pertinent excerpt from...
General Assurance Society Ltd. Vs. Chandumull Jain & ANR [1966] INSC 36 (7 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 36 SC

Headnote :

The appellant Society issued letters of acceptance for the proposals and cover notes, claiming to insure certain houses owned by the respondents against damages from fire, flood, and other risks. The cover notes indicated that the insurance was subject to the \'usual conditions of the Society\'s pol...
Shri Ram Prasad (Deceased) By His Legal Representative Vs. The State of Punjab [1966] INSC 37 (7 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Headnote :

On March 4, 1953, the President of India took control of the Government of PEPSU, which included Patiala, under Article 356 of the Constitution. Subsequently, on February 27, 1954, utilizing the powers granted by the Proclamation, the President issued the Bank of Patiala Regulation and Management Or...
Baban Singh & ANR Vs. Jagdish Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 38 (8 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 38 SC

Headnote :

The appellants submitted affidavits in the High Court, claiming they had not received any money as part of a compromise in a first appeal that was ongoing in that Court. In response, the High Court directed the Registrar to conduct an inquiry. After gathering evidence from both parties, the Registra...
Ranjit Singh Vs. Pritam Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 39 (8 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 39 SC

Headnote :

The appellant\'s election to Parliament was contested by the first respondent on the basis that the returning officer had improperly rejected the nomination papers of the third candidate, W, which significantly influenced the election outcome. We submitted three nomination papers, but only one inclu...
Sitaram Motilal Kalal Vs. Santanuprasad Jaishankar Bhatt [1966] INSC 40 (8 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 40 SC

Headnote :

The vehicle\'s owner entrusted it to A for use as a taxi. A operated the taxi, collected fares, covered expenses, and provided the remaining balance along with accounts to the owner. B, who cleaned the taxi, was either employed by the owner or by A on the owner\'s behalf. It appears that A, seeking...
Ram Chander Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Bihar & ANR [1966] INSC 41 (8 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 41 SC

Headnote :

The appellants\' mill received electric power from the Patna Electricity Supply Company. The electric meter was manipulated by breaking its seals, opening its stud, and inserting a wire that halted the rotation of the disc, thereby preventing accurate measurement of electricity consumption. This con...
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors Vs. Vishnu Prasad Sharma & Ors [1966] INSC 42 (9 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 42 SC

Headnote :

Following the issuance of a notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which indicated that lands in certain villages might be required for a public purpose, several notifications regarding different parcels of land mentioned in the section 4(1) notification were subsequently...
Kishanchand Lunidasingh Bajaj Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mysore [1966] INSC 43 (10 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 10 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 43 SC

Headnote :

B and his sons formed a Hindu undivided family that held shares in various public limited companies. The family engaged in money lending under a firm name, and in the firm\'s accounting records, the shares registered in B\'s name were recorded as the business\'s capital. When two sons separated from...
G. Sadanandan Vs. State of Kerala & ANR [1966] INSC 44 (11 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 11 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner was a wholesale kerosene oil dealer in Kerala. The State Government detained him under Rule 30(1)(b) of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, claiming he was likely to act in a way that would harm the maintenance of essential supplies and services for the community. He challenged his dete...
State of Kerala Vs. Ramaswami Iyer & Sons [1966] INSC 45 (11 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 11 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 45 SC

Headnote :

The respondent paid a portion of sales tax that was assessed on the amount collected from its customers as sales tax, which was included in its net turnover. The respondent filed a lawsuit seeking a refund of the sales tax charged on the sales tax it collected, arguing that it was not legally owed u...
Mervyn Coutindo & Ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay & Ors [1966] INSC 46 (14 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 46 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners, who served as Appraisers in the Customs Department, submitted a writ petition under Article 32, contesting the legitimacy of the rotational system used to determine the seniority of Appraisers and Principal Appraisers. According to the relevant departmental circulars, the system dic...
State of Gujarat Vs. Jaganbhai Bhagwanbhai [1966] INSC 47 (16 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 16 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 47 SC

Headnote :

The second defendant sold property that belonged to him and his minor son, the third defendant, and also signed an indemnity bond in favor of the buyer, agreeing to compensate him for any losses that might arise if the sale of the third defendant\'s half share was later annulled. The buyer then sold...
V. M. Rv. Mr. Ramaswami Chettiar & ANR Vs. R. Muthukrishna Iyer & Ors [1966] INSC 48 (16 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 16 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 48 SC

Headnote :

The second defendant sold property that belonged to him and his minor son, the third defendant, and also signed an indemnity bond in favor of the buyer, agreeing to compensate him for any losses that might arise if the sale of the third defendant\'s half share was later annulled. The buyer then sold...
Bank of Baroda Vs. Rajender Pal Soni [1966] INSC 49 (19 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 49 SC

Abdul Waheed Khan Vs. Bhawani & Ors [1966] INSC 50 (21 February 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Feb 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 50 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, as the khatedar of the disputed land, filed a suit for the eviction of the respondents, claiming they were shikmi tenants. This suit was granted by the Tahsildar under section 71 of the Bhopal State Land Revenue Act, 1932. Within 12 years of their dispossession, the respondents initia...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter