Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Sir Hukumchand & Mannalal Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madhya Pradesh [1966] INSC 1 (4 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Headnote :

The Income-tax Officer revoked the renewal certificate of the appellant-firm\'s registration under rule 6B of the Income-tax Rules, citing that the firm was not genuine. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, the Tribunal, and the High Court, upon reference, determined that no appeal could be made ag...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Punjab Vs. M/S. Chander Bhan Harbhajan Lal [1966] INSC 2 (4 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 04 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Headnote :

The assessee-firm, made up of 14 partners, sought registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act, 1922. One of the partners, G, was also a partner in another firm known as the Ferozepore firm, which had 8 partners. They had an agreement stating that if any work was conducted by any partner wit...
Ram Gopal Reddy Vs. Additional Custodian Evacuee Property, Hyderabad [1966] INSC 3 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 3 SC

Headnote :

The appellant acquired a parcel of land from an individual named A in 1946.Despite the land being valued at over Rs. 100, no registered sale deed was executed. In 1949, A was declared an evacuee, prompting the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Property to issue a notice to the appellant, asking him to exp...
K. V. Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. P. N. Venkatasubramania Iyer & Ors [1966] INSC 4 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 4 SC

Headnote :

In 1932, the appellant renewed a promissory note that his brother had executed in 1930 in favor of N, the father of the respondents, for Rs. 1,000. This promissory note was subsequently renewed in 1937, 1940, and 1944, covering the principal amount along with interest. The last three promissory note...
Ramesh & ANR Vs. Seth Gendalal Motilal Patni & Ors [1966] INSC 5 (6 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 06 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Headnote :

In the proceedings under section 19(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950, the Claims Officer determined, upon the appellant\'s application, that the debt owed to P, the first respondent, was a secured debt, even though a decree had alr...
Commssioner of Income-Tax, Bombay,South Poona Vs. Murlidhar Jhawar & Purna Ginning And Pressing Factory, Dhar [1966] INSC 6 (7 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 07 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

M, P, and G engaged in business across various commodities, and during the assessment year 1954-55, the Income-Tax Officer assessed a third share of Rs. 51,280 as profits from the business for each of the three individuals. Subsequently, the officer requested M to file a return for the \"income of t...
Gowlibuddanna Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Mysore, Bangalore [1966] INSC 7 (10 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Headnote :

B, along with his wife, two unmarried daughters, and the appellant, who was B\'s adopted son, formed a Hindu undivided family. During his lifetime, B was assessed as the manager of this family concerning the income generated from their dealings. After B\'s death, for the assessment year 1951-52, the...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City Vs. Tata Locomotive & Engineering Co. Ltd. [1966] INSC 8 (13 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 13 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Headnote :

The assessee was a limited company based in Bombay, primarily engaged in manufacturing locomotive boilers and locomotives. To facilitate this, the company procured plant and machinery from various countries, including the U.S.A. It appointed M/s. Tata Inc., New York, as its purchasing agent in the U...
Sheodan Singh Vs. Smt. Daryao Kunwar [1966] INSC 9 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 9 SC

Headnote :

The appellant initiated two lawsuits in the Civil Judge\'s Court: one seeking a declaration of his ownership of the disputed property and the other for additional reliefs. While these cases were ongoing, the respondent filed two lawsuits in the Munsif\'s Court against the appellant, asserting joint...
The Roman Catholic Mission Vs. State of Madras & ANR [1966] INSC 10 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Headnote :

The lands in question were granted as inam for the purpose of performing puja in a Devasthanam. Due to their alienation, the Revenue Divisional Officer, acting under section 44B of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act of 1926, resumed and regranted these lands to the Devasthanam, determining th...
Smt. Dayawati & ANR Vs. Inderjit & Ors [1966] INSC 11 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Headnote :

The trial court awarded the appellants interest exceeding 7.5% in a mortgage case against the respondents. The respondents then approached the High Court, where they had an ongoing appeal against the trial court\'s decree, along with a petition under Section 3 of the Usurious Act, 1918, as amended b...
Sastri Yagnapurushadji & Ors Vs. Muldas Brudardas Vaishya & ANR [1966] INSC 12 (14 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 14 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 12 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, known as Satsangis and followers of the Swaminarayan sect, initiated a representative lawsuit:(i) seeking a declaration that the pertinent sections of the Bombay Harijan Temple Entry Act, 1947, as amended by Act 77 of 1948, were inapplicable to their temples, arguing that the Swamina...
The State of Bihar Vs. Rambalak Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 13 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 13 SC

Headnote :

The individual, who was detained under Rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, submitted a petition to the High Court seeking a writ of habeas corpus. The High Court subsequently issued an order granting the individual interim bail.In the appeal to this Court regarding that order, the appellant...
Gulam Yasin Khan Vs. Shri Sahebrao Yeshwantrao Walaskar & Ors [1966] INSC 14 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and respondent No. 1 were candidates for election to the Municipal Committee of Malkapur.During the scrutiny process, respondent No. 1 raised an objection against the appellant\'s candidacy, claiming that the appellant was disqualified under section 15(1) of the Central Provinces & Ber...
Katra Educational Society Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1966] INSC 15 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act of 1860, operated an educational institution in Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh. The management of the society\'s affairs was assigned to an Executive Committee, composed solely of society members, as outlined in the memorandum of as...
Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Kerala [1966] INSC 16 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

In calculating the total earned income of the appellant company for the calendar year 1959, the Income Tax Officer rejected a deduction claim of Rs. 80,255 related to the company\'s liability for tax payments under the Wealth Tax Act, 27 of 1957. This decision was upheld on appeal by the Appellate A...
Godawari S. Parulekar & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra [1966] INSC 17 (17 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was held in detention starting from November 1962 under various orders. She was released on February 4, 1964, but immediately upon her release, she was served with a new detention order dated February 3, 1963, issued by the State Government under rule 30 of the Defence of India Rules,...
M. V. Krishnan Nambissan Vs. State of Kerala [1966] INSC 18 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who managed a dairy farm, faced charges under sections 7 and 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, in conjunction with rule 44 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. He was accused of selling skimmed thick buttermilk that was found to be adulterate...
Everest Apartments Co-Operative Housingsociety Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1966] INSC 19 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a registered co-operative Housing Society under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Respondent no. 4, S, sought membership in the society, but his application was denied. He appealed to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies under section 23(2) of the Act, who...
K. G. Khosla & Co. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxies [1966] INSC 20 (18 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 18 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The appellant entered into a contract with the Director General of Civil Supplies in New Delhi for the supply of axle bodies produced by its principals in Belgium. The goods were inspected in Belgium on behalf of the buyers, but according to the contract, they could be rejected after further inspect...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Patiala & Ors Vs. M/S. Shahzada Nand & Sons & Ors [1966] INSC 21 (19 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 19 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

On March 26, 1954, the Income-tax authorities issued a notice to the respondents under section 34(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, concerning the assessment year 1945-46. The assessment resulting from this notice was annulled by the appellate authorities on the basis that the notice under s...
Navinchandra Babubhai Nagarsheth & Ors Vs. Bombay Revenue Tribunal & Ors [1966] INSC 22 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were shareholders in Inam villages. Following the abolition of Inams under the Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1953, they sought compensation for their Inam as per section 17(1) of the Act. Section 17(5) states, \"Nothing in this section shall entitle any person to compensation o...
Addanki Narayanappa & ANR Vs. Bhaskara Krishtappa And 13 Ors [1966] INSC 23 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

The members of two Joint Hindu families (the Appellants and the Respondents) formed a partnership to conduct business. In 1949, the members of one family initiated a lawsuit seeking the dissolution of the partnership and an accounting of its affairs. The members of the other family contended that th...
Kehar Singh & Ors Vs. Dewan Singh & Ors [1966] INSC 24 (21 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 21 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The revenue authorities approved the transfer of lands bequeathed by S, an Aulakh Jat from Tehsil Ajnala in Amritsar District, to the appellants, who were S\'s collaterals in the 8th degree. The respondents filed a lawsuit for possession of these lands, asserting their claim as descendants of K. The...
Rao Nihalkaran Vs. Ramgopal [1966] INSC 25 (27 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 27 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who holds an inam in Madhya Pradesh, issued a notice to his tenant, the respondent, terminating the tenancy on the grounds of wanting the land for personal cultivation, and subsequently filed a suit for eviction. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant. However, during the app...
Amar Singh & Ors Vs. Rana Balbahadur Singh [1966] INSC 26 (27 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 27 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

In 1936, certain ryotwari lands owned by the respondent\'s estate in Madhya Bharat were leased for cultivation to the appellants\' father, M, by the Court of Wards, which managed the estate. After the Court of Wards released the estate in 1951, the respondent ended the tenancy and filed a lawsuit se...
Mohd. Raza Dabstani Vs. State of Bombay & Ors [1966] INSC 27 (28 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 28 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, originally from Iran, moved to India in 1938. In 1945, he acquired an Iranian passport and traveled to Iraq for pilgrimage. Upon returning to India, he was registered as an Iranian national under the Registration of Foreigners Act of 1939. On May 25, 1951, he received a retail permit...
Girdharilal Amratlal Shodan & Ors Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors [1966] INSC 28 (28 January 1966)

Judgement Date : 28 Jan 1966

Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Headnote :

If a notification issued under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is deemed invalid, the Government has the authority to consider it ineffective and can issue a new notification under section 6 in its stead.Section 48 of the Act does not prevent the Government from taking this action. The a...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter