Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Category SideBar

IPC Section 499. Defamation


Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person.

Explanation 1

It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives.

Explanation 2

It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such.

Explanation 3

An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation.

Explanation 4

No imputation is said to harm a person`s reputation, unless that imputation directly or indirectly, in the estimation of others, lowers the moral or intellectual character of that person, or lowers the character of that person in respect of his caste or of his calling, or lowers the credit of that person, or causes it to be believed that the body of that person is in a loathsome state, or in a state generally considered as disgraceful.

Illustrations

(a) A says-"Z is an honest man; he never stole B`s watch"; intending to cause it to be believed that Z did steal B`s watch. This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

(b) A is asked who stole B`s watch. A points to Z, intending to cause it to be believed that Z stole B`s watch. This is defamation unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

(c) A draws a picture of Z running away with B`s watch, intending it to be believed that Z stole B`s watch. This is defamation, unless it fall within one of the exceptions.

First Exception.-Imputation of truth which public good requires to be made or published.-It is not defamation to impute anything which is true concerning any person, if it be for the public good that the imputation should be made or published. Whether or not it is for the public good is a question of fact.

Second Exception.-Public conduct of public servants.-It is not defamation to express in a good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of a public servant in the discharge of his public functions, or respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Third Exception.-Conduct of any person touching any public question.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the conduct of any person touching any public question, and respecting his character, so far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustration

It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting Z`s conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public question, in presiding or attending a such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the public support, in voting or canvassing for a particular candidate for any situation in the efficient discharges of the duties of which the public is interested.

Fourth Exception.-Publication of reports of proceedings of Courts.-It is not defamation to publish substantially true report of the proceedings of a Court of Justice, or of the result of any such proceedings.

Explanation

A Justice of the Peace or other officer holding an inquiry in open Court preliminary to a trial in a Court of Justice, is a Court within the meaning of the above section.

Fifth Exception.-Merits of case decided in Court or conduct of witnesses and others concerned.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting the merits of any case, civil or criminal, which has been decided by a Court of Justice, or respecting the conduct of any person as a party, witness or agent, in any such case, or respecting the character of such person, as far as his character appears in that conduct, and no further.

Illustrations

(a) A says-"I think Z`s evidence on that trial is so contradictory that he must be stupid or dishonest". A is within this exception if he says this is in good faith, in as much as the opinion which he expresses respects Z`s character as it appears in Z`s conduct as a witness, and no further.

(b) But if A says-"I do not believe what Z asserted at that trial because I know him to be a man without veracity"; A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which he express of Z`s character, is an opinion not founded on Z`s conduct as a witness.

Sixth Exception.-Merits of public performance.-It is not defamation to express in good faith any opinion respecting the merits of any performance which its author has submitted to the judgment of the public, or respecting the character of the author so far as his character appears in such performance, and no further.

Explanation

A performance may be submitted to the judgment of the public expressly or by acts on the part of the author which imply such submission to the judgment of the public.

Illustrations

(a) A person who publishes a book, submits that book to the judgment of the public.

(b) A person who makes a speech in public, submits that speech to the judgment of the public.

(c) An actor or singer who appears on a public stage, submits his acting or signing in the judgment of the public.

(d) A says of a book published by Z-"Z`s book is foolish; Z must be a weak man. Z`s book is indecent; Z must be a man of impure mind". A is within the exception, if he says this in good faith, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z respects Z`s character only so far as it appears in Z`s book, and no further.

(e) But if A says-"I am not surprised that Z`s book is foolish and indecent, for he is a weak man and a libertine". A is not within this exception, in as much as the opinion which he expresses of Z`s character is an opinion not founded on Z`s book.

Seventh Exception.-Censure passed in good faith by person having lawful authority over another.-It is not defamation in a person having over another any authority, either conferred by law or arising out of a lawful contract made with that other, to pass in good faith any censure on the conduct of that other in matters to which such lawful authority relates.

Illustration

A Judge censuring in good faith the conduct of a witness, or of an officer of the Court; a head of a department censuring in good faith those who are under his orders; a parent censuring in good faith a child in the presence of other children; a school-master, whose authority is derived from a parent, censuring in good faith a pupil in the presence of other pupils; a master censuring a servant in good faith for remissness in service; a banker censuring in good faith the cashier of his bank for the conduct of such cashier as such cashier-are within this exception.

Eighth Exception.-Accusation preferred in good faith to authorised person.-It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject-matter of accusation.

Illustration

If A in good faith accuse Z before a Magistrate; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, a servant, to Z`s master; if A in good faith complains of the conduct of Z, and child, to Z`s father-A is within this exception.

Ninth Exception.-Imputation made in good faith by person for protection of his or other`s interests.-It is not defamation to make an imputation on the character of another provided that the imputation be made in good faith for the protection of the interests of the person making it, or of any other person, or for the public good.

Illustrations

(a) A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business-"Sell nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, for I have no opinion of his honesty". A is within the exception, if he has made this imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interests.

(b) A, a Magistrate, in making a report of his own superior officer, casts an imputation on the character of Z. Here, if the imputation is made in good faith, and for the public good, A is within the exception.

Tenth Exception.-Caution intended for good of person to whom conveyed or for public good.-It is not defamation to convey a caution, in good faith, to one person against another, provided that such caution be intended for the good of the person to whom it is conveyed, or of some person in whom that person is interested, or for the public good.

COMMENTS

Imputation without publication

In section 499 the words "makes or publishes any imputation" should be interpreted as words supplementing to each other. A maker of imputation without publication is not liable to be punished under that section; Bilal Ahmed Kaloo v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1997) 7 Supreme Today 127.

 

 
Related News & Articles :
Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 

Related judgement on IPC Section 499. Defamation

Vinod Dua Vs. Union of India, 2021 Latest Caselaw 253 SC ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI vs. UNION OF INDIA, 2020 Latest Caselaw 371 SC GOOGLE INDIA PRIVATE LTD vs. M/S. VISAKHA INDUSTRIES, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1237 SC Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) Vs. Union of India, 2019 Latest Caselaw 463 SC K.K. Mishra Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & ANR. [APRIL 13, 2018], 2018 Latest Caselaw 266 SC Mohammed Abdulla Khan Vs. Prakash K. [December 4, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 853 SC Justice (Retd.) Markandey Katju Vs. The Lok Sabha & ANR. [December 15, 2016], 2016 Latest Caselaw 921 SC Shreya Singhal Vs. Union of India [March 24, 2015], 2015 Latest Caselaw 237 SC Dr. Mehmood Nayyar Azam Vs.State of Chattisgarh and Ors. [August 03, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 401 SC Rajendra Prataprao Mane & Ors. Vs. Sadashivrao Mandalik K.T.S.S.K. 3 Ltd. & Ors. [March 22, 2012], 2012 Latest Caselaw 188 SC Jeffrey J.Diermeier & ANR. Vs. State of West Bengal & ANR. [2010] INSC 410 (14 May 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 398 SC S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal & ANR. [2010] INSC 347 (28 April 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 324 SC S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal & ANR. [2010] INSC 327 (28 April 2010), 2010 Latest Caselaw 322 SC S.D.Kathuria Vs. Thiru N.Ravi & Ors. [2009] INSC 509 (6 March 2009), 2009 Latest Caselaw 258 SC N.K. Sharma Vs. Abhimanyu [2005] Insc 565 (7 October 2005), 2005 Latest Caselaw 563 SC John Thomas Vs. Dr. K. Jagadeesan [2001] INSC 319 (12 July 2001), 2001 Latest Caselaw 319 SC M.N. Damani Vs. S.K. Sinha & Ors [2001] INSC 268 (2 May 2001), 2001 Latest Caselaw 268 SC Shatrughna Prasad Sinha Vs. Rajbhau Surajmal Rathi & Ors [1996] INSC 1104 (10 September 1996), 1996 Latest Caselaw 742 SC State of Bihar Vs. Murad Ali Khan & Ors [1988] INSC 316 (10 October 1988), 1988 Latest Caselaw 312 SC Sewakram Sobhani Vs. R.K. Karanjia, Chief Editor, Weekly Blitz & Ors [1981] INSC 104 (1 May 1981), 1981 Latest Caselaw 104 SC G. Narasimhan & Ors Vs. T. V. Chokkappa [1972] INSC 204 (4 September 1972), 1972 Latest Caselaw 204 SC Balraj Khanna & Ors Vs. Moti Ram [1971] INSC 122 (22 April 1971), 1971 Latest Caselaw 122 SC Sukra Mahto Vs. Basdeo Kumar Mahto &. ANR [1971] INSC 105 (2 April 1971), 1971 Latest Caselaw 105 SC Shiv Kirpal Singh Vs. Shri V. V. Giri [1970] INSC 191 (14 September 1970), 1970 Latest Caselaw 191 SC Perspective Publications (P) Ltd. & ANR Vs. State of Maharashtra [1968] INSC 280 (19 November 1968), 1968 Latest Caselaw 280 SC Harbhajan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1965] INSC 53 (2 March 1965), 1965 Latest Caselaw 53 SC Haridas Das & ANR Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors [1964] INSC 78 (16 March 1964), 1964 Latest Caselaw 78 SC State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Revashankar [1958] INSC 83 (24 September 1958), 1958 Latest Caselaw 83 SC Basir-Ul-Huq & Ors Vs. The State of West Bengal [1953] INSC 29 (10 April 1953), 1953 Latest Caselaw 29 SC Bathina Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. The State of Madras [1952] INSC 7 (14 February 1952), 1952 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Click here to view all Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on IPC Section 499. Defamation