Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Delhi Motor Company & Ors Vs. U.A. Basrurkar & Ors [1968] INSC 1 (8 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Headnote :

Documents were executed between the appellant firm and the respondent company regarding premises where the latter was a tenant. The appellant claimed these documents were meant to establish a sublease for three sections of the premises, although they seemingly aimed to create a partnership to circum...
O. N. Mohindroo Vs. The Bar Council of Delhi & Ors [1968] INSC 2 (8 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted a writ petition to the High Court seeking to annul: (a) the suspension order issued against him by the State Bar Council under section 4.35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, (b) the Bar Council of India\'s order in appeal under section 37 of the Act, which upheld the suspension, an...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay Vs. M/S. Shree Goverdhan Ltd., Bombay [1968] INSC 3 (9 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 09 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 3 SC

Headnote :

According to the Indian Income-tax Act of 1922, specifically sections 2(11) and 23A, a company\'s accounting year concludes on September 30 each year. In this case, the company is a partner in a firm whose accounting periods for the assessment year 1951-52 end on November 30, 1950, and March 31, 195...
T. S. Pl. P. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. T. K. B. Santhanaramaswami Odayar & Ors [1968] INSC 4 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 4 SC

Headnote :

When the Raja of Tanjore passed away in 1855 without any male heirs, the East India Company seized all of his properties, including his personal assets. However, following a memorial submitted by the senior widow of the deceased Raja, the Government of India approved the transfer of all the landed p...
Anglo American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax, Kerala State [1968] INSC 5 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were engaged in the cultivation, production, and sale of tea, with some owning tea plantations both within and outside Kerala.The income generated from the sale of tea that was cultivated and produced by the sellers is considered to be derived partly from business activities and partl...
Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Limited Vs. The Government of Madras [1968] INSC 6 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner, a public limited company engaged in the production of various steel and iron products, sought an exemption from tax from the respondent Madras Government under section 12 of the Madras Electricity Act No. IV of 1962. This section stipulates that if a specified type of energy is consu...
Ramji Dixit & ANR Vs. Bhrigunath & Ors [1968] INSC 7 (12 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Headnote :

Following the death of her husband, a Hindu widow inherited certain agricultural lands. She became a bhumidhar upon the implementation of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act of 1951. Subsequently, she transferred the lands to respondents 1 and 2 as a gift. After her passing, the appell...
Hira Singh Pal Vs. Madan Lal [1968] INSC 8 (15 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 15 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Headnote :

The respondent submitted two nomination papers to contest the 1967 general election for the Legislative Assembly from a constituency in Himachal Pradesh. Both papers were rejected during the scrutiny process. The first nomination was dismissed because the name of the proposer was incorrectly listed...
Ningawwa Vs. Byrappa & Ors [1968] INSC 9 (17 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 9 SC

Headnote :

In 1938, the appellant signed a gift deed transferring four plots of land—two located in village T and two in village L—to her husband. At that time, the appellant was young and illiterate, and her husband was able to exert control over her decisions. She believed that the document pertained onl...
Minor P. Rajendran Vs. State of Madras & Ors [1968] INSC 10 (17 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners contested a decision made by the State Government regarding the rules established for selecting candidates for admission to a medical program. These rules included seat reservations for different categories of candidates, such as Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, \'socially and edu...
Laxman Siddappa Naik Vs. Kattimani Chaniappa Jamappanna & Ors [1968] INSC 11 (19 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 19 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Headnote :

A candidate who was unsuccessful in the election for a seat in the Mysore Legislative Assembly, designated for a member of the Scheduled Tribes, filed an election petition arguing that the other three candidates were from the Bedar caste, which is not recognized as a tribe in Part VIII, paragraph 2...
Pashupati Nath Singh Vs. Harihar Prasad Singh [1968] INSC 12 (22 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 12 SC

Headnote :

The appellant contested the election of the respondent to the Bihar Legislative Assembly through an election petition, arguing that his nomination paper had been wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer. On January 21, 1967, the scheduled date for the scrutiny of nomination papers as per section 36...
R. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. State of Kerala [1968] INSC 13 (23 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 13 SC

Headnote :

The appellant began operating a hotel in 1948. In 1949, he opened a second hotel, followed by a third in 1959 at the same location. With the addition of the third hotel, the total number of employees reached 20.The issue at hand is whether the proprietor can claim an exemption under S. 16(1)(b) of t...
Hazari & Ors Vs. Neki & Ors [1968] INSC 14 (25 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 25 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

According to section 4 of the Amending Act (Punjab Act 10 of 1960), section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act of 1913 was repealed and replaced with a new provision that did not grant a right of pre-emption to individuals who owned land in the estate, as the original section 15(c) \'thirdly\' had pro...
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors Vs. Sardar D.K. Jadav [1968] INSC 15 (25 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 25 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

Refer to section 4 of the Act.According to section 5(c) of the Act, all tanks, private wells, and similar structures located on \'occupied land\' as defined in section 2(i)(ix) of the Act are exempt from vesting. The Madhya Pradesh Revenue Code of 1959 (Act 20 of 1959) in section 251 states that all...
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Maharaj Narain & Ors [1968] INSC 16 (30 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 30 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

The appellant State submitted an appeal to the High Court on March 29, 1963, challenging the trial court\'s order from November 10, 1962, which had acquitted the respondents. The details in the order copy included with the Memorandum of Appeal indicated that the appeal was timely filed. It showed th...
Kt. N. Rm. Thenappa Chettiar & Ors Vs. N. S. Kr. Karuppan Chettiar & Ors [1968] INSC 17 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellants initiated a lawsuit seeking the establishment of a scheme regarding a trust and an accounting of its management by C, along with certain related reliefs. They contended that the trust was a joint establishment created on November 12, 1919, by the ancestors of several parties involved...
Special Land Acquisition & Rehabilitation Officer, Sagar Vs. M. S. Seshagiri Rao & ANR [1968] INSC 18 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The Government of Mysore allocated a parcel of land to the respondents with the stipulation that \"if the Government needs the land for any reason, the grantee must return the land to the Government without seeking any compensation.\" The Government proceeded to acquire the land following the proced...
Union of India Vs. Nanak Singh [1968] INSC 19 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

Headnote :

The respondent served as a temporary Field Inspector at the Office of the Custodian of Evacuee Property in Delhi. In January 1958, the Additional Settlement Commissioner, Mr. Kane, who also held the position of Additional Custodian, terminated the respondent\'s employment, providing one month\'s sal...
Chhatu Ram Horil Ram Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & ANR [1968] INSC 20 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company secured a lease for certain mica-bearing land from the owners for a duration of fifteen years.The lease agreement included a provision for renewal at the lessee\'s discretion upon the expiration of the lease term. However, the land was part of an estate that, due to a notificat...
Birendra Pratap Singh & ANR Vs. Gulwant Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 21 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

P held an ex-proprietary tenancy over certain lands and, on June 5, 1947, executed a sub-lease in favor of the appellants, which stipulated that the tenancy would commence on July 1, 1947, and was registered on June 22. On January 15, 1951, P surrendered his tenancy rights to the landlord, who subse...
Firm Mukand Lal Veer Kumar & ANR Vs. Sri Purushottam Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 22 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

M, a partner in a firm, executed a deed of gift for a property that was not part of the partnership in October 1957. This deed was registered in March 1958. Subsequently, in April, May 1958, and January 1959, petitions were filed claiming that the firm and its two partners had engaged in acts of ins...
Gram Sabha, Besahani Vs. Ram Raj Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 23 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

The respondents initiated a lawsuit under section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act of 1950 concerning five plots of land, asserting Sirdari rights in one plot and Bhumidari rights in the other four. They contested the order issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which was clai...
Thakore Sobhag Singh Vs. Thakur Jai Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 24 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The Board of Revenue in Rajasthan rejected the respondent\'s claim to be recognized as the adopted son of the last holder of the jagir without making a determination on the fact of adoption. They based their decision on the grounds that, according to the Matmi Rules, an adoption made without prior a...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter