Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Harcharan Singh Vs. Mohinder Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 134 (1 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 01 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 134 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted his nomination papers for a seat in the Vidhan Sabha for a constituency that was different from the one where he was registered as a voter. Along with his nomination papers, he provided an application for a certified extract, which included a certificate on the back that cont...
Ishwarlal Girdharlal Parekh Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1968] INSC 135 (1 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 01 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 135 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, along with several others, was tried for conspiring to defraud the income tax authorities regarding the income tax assessment of a firm. The prosecution charged him, among other things, with an offense under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.). The appellant raised an object...
Ashiq Miyan & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1968] INSC 136 (1 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 01 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 136 SC

Headnote :

Upon receiving information that opium was being smuggled and secretly stored in the appellants\' residence, the Sub-Inspector of Police, accompanied by a police team, conducted a raid on their house and discovered a significant quantity of opium in the courtyard. The Sub-Inspector then filed a repor...
Shiv Raj Singh Vs. Delhi Administration [1968] INSC 137 (1 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 01 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 137 SC

Headnote :

An unmarried woman gave birth to a child, and at her request, her uncle and aunt arranged for the child to be raised by someone looking to adopt. The appellant, a police officer, accused the uncle and aunt of illegally disposing of an illegitimate child and demanded a bribe from them. The anti-corru...
Dr. Devendra M. Surti Vs. State of Gujarat [1968] INSC 138 (2 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 138 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a medical professional who operated a dispensary, faced prosecution for failing to maintain an employee register as mandated by rule 23(1) of the regulations established under the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act of 1948. He argued that he should not be prosecuted since his dispens...
Hadibandhu Das Vs. District Magistrate, Cuttack & ANR [1968] INSC 139 (2 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Headnote :

On December 15, 1967, the District Magistrate of Cuttack issued an order under section 3 (1) (a) (ii) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, which directed the detention of the appellant for various reasons. On December 19, 1967, the appellant filed a petition in the High Court contesting the detent...
Ishwar Singh Bindra & Ors Vs. The State of U.P [1968] INSC 140 (2 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 140 SC

Headnote :

In July 1963, the Inspector of Drugs for the Agra Region lodged a complaint with a Magistrate in Mathura, claiming that a product known as anti-phlogistic plaster was produced and sold by a partnership involving the first two appellants, with the third appellant serving as the Manager. The plaster\'...
Laxman Balkrishna Joshi Vs. Trimbak Bapu Godbole & ANR [1968] INSC 141 (2 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 141 SC

Headnote :

A person who presents themselves as available to provide medical advice and treatment implicitly claims to possess the necessary skills and knowledge for that purpose. When such a person is consulted by a patient, they have specific responsibilities, including a duty of care in deciding whether to t...
Kalinga Tubes Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1968] INSC 142 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a successful public company primarily engaged in the production and sale of iron pipes and poles. In August 1965, its employees requested a bonus rate higher than their current compensation, prompting the Assistant Labour Commissioner to initiate discussions with both the managemen...
State of Punjab & Ors Vs. Bhai Ardaman Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 143 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 143 SC

Headnote :

Some land tenants submitted a complaint to the Collectors of Sangrur and Bhatinda, claiming they had been forcibly dispossessed of their lands in May/June 1943. They requested an order for the restoration of possession under Section 43 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Act 8 of 1953. The Collect...
Amrit Lal Ambalal Patel Vs. Himatbhai Gomanbhai Patel & ANR [1968] INSC 144 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 144 SC

Headnote :

The appellant emerged victorious in the 1967 State Legislative Assembly Elections. The scrutiny of nominations was scheduled for January 21, 1967, and the actual voting occurred on February 18, 1967. However, the appellant\'s election was contested on the basis that he was under 25 years of age and...
Govardhan Dass & 8 Ors Vs. Smt. Sitabai [1968] INSC 145 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 145 SC

Headnote :

The predecessors of the respondent executed usufructuary mortgage deeds in 1898 in favor of the predecessors of the appellants concerning certain \'sir\' land. In 1940, one of the mortgagors, R, who was the husband of the respondent, was declared insolvent, and his share of the proprietary rights, w...
S. Rajagopal Vs. C. M. Armugam & Ors [1968] INSC 146 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 146 SC

Headnote :

In 1950, during the election, the appellant defeated respondent No. 1, who subsequently filed an election petition under Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.The petition argued that the appellant was not a Hindu but a Christian, and thus was not eligible to be a candidate from a...
Orient Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India [1968] INSC 147 (3 May 1968)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 147 SC

Headnote :

Until February 1961, certain types of \"printing and writing paper\" and \"packing and wrapping paper\" produced by the appellant Company were subject to an excise duty of 22 nP per kilogram. The former was classified under Item 17(3) and the latter under Item 17(4) of the First Schedule to the Cent...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter