Thursday, 30, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Hukam Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 105 SC

Anjali Arora Vs. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 111 SC

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Vs FAQUIREY

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 113 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Section 302 and Section 304 Part I, was referenced in a case where the High Court altered the Respondent\'s conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part I IPC. The Supreme Court noted that it is undisputed that the Respondent fired the pistol out of...
BUNDI ZILA PETROL PUMP DEALERS ASSOCIATION BUNDI Vs SANYOJAK BUNDI ZILA PETROL MAZDOOR SANGH(B.M.S.)

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 115 SC

Headnote :

The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 has been addressed by the Supreme Court, which has overturned the decisions made by the Division Bench, the Single Judge, and the Industrial Tribunal. The case is now referred back to the Industrial Tribunal. The Supreme Court has permitted the Appellant to submit...
BAYAJI SAMBHU MALI @ BORATE Vs NAZIR MOHAMMED BALAL ZARI & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 116 SC

Headnote :

The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act of 1948 applies in this case. The appellant is the tenant, while the respondent is the landlord. The Supreme Court determined that the appellant was indeed a tenant of the first respondent. In this situation, there was no requirement for the appellant to...
CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN Vs STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB CID AND ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 117 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, noted that both the deceased and the accused were sleeping in the same room, and the deceased\'s death was attributed to a drug overdose. The prosecution failed to convincingly demonstrate that the accused was responsible for ad...
MAHESH DUBE Vs SHIVBODH AND ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 118 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, under Section 456 of the Criminal Procedure Code, has ruled that the respondents/tenants must return possession of the property in question, from which the appellant and his father were forcibly removed, to the appellant within one month of receiving a certified copy of this order...
SUKHPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 119 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34, determined that there was no established motive against the appellant for the murder. It is acknowledged that motive can be significant in cases relying on circumstantial evidence. The key question is whethe...
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Vs RAVINDRA NATH & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 120 SC

Headnote :

In the current appeal, the appellant points to the establishment of a Committee by the Government of India in August 1981, which was tasked with creating uniform guidelines regarding salaries and other conditions for Officers of Indian Banks stationed abroad. Given that the salaries for all Officers...
PARKASH CHAND Vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 376 and 506, was referenced in this case. The trial court based its decision on the testimony of the prosecutrix, who stated that the appellant had threatened her with death if she revealed the incident to anyone. This threat was reportedly connected to a...
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 122 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961 states that the Supreme Court found no error in the Division Bench\'s ruling that overturned the Single Judge\'s order to refund the conversion fee. The petitioner in the writ has made an alternative request for a writ of mandamus, asking the respondents to permit the conv...
SAU. KAMAL SHIVAJI POKARNEKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 123 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court addressed the Indian Penal Code, 1860, specifically Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 in conjunction with Section 34. The Court noted that the Magistrate is not required to assess the merits of the evidence or material supporting the complaint, as it is not the Magistrate\'s role to...
INTERNATIONAL SPIRITS AND WINES ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Headnote :

The Haryana Liquor License (Amendment) Rules 2017, which are part of the Punjab Excise Act of 1914, have been evaluated. According to the majority opinion, Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License (Amendment) Rules 2017, as modified by the Financial Commissioner using the authority granted unde...
VASANT CHEMICALS LIMITED Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD METROPOLITIAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 125 SC

Headnote :

The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act of 1989, Section 55, states that the Supreme Court noted that the appellant, as the occupant of the premises, although not directly connected to the Board\'s sewer line, ultimately discharges into the Board\'s sewerage system after partial tre...
TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs TNEB-THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 126 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in reference to Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, noted that the Dearness Allowance for the Board\'s employees should be aligned with what the State government provides to its own employees. The Court pointed out that both the Single Judge and the Division Bench...
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs C. GIRIJA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 127 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court of India, under Article 32 of the Constitution, ruled that the applicant is entitled to receive retirement benefits immediately upon retirement. The Court instructed Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in Writ Petition (C) No. 653 of 2015 to calculate and disburse the retirement benefits to the...
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs SURENDRA PUNDLIK GADLING & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 128 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 43D of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, noted that the public prosecutor has the discretion to either agree or disagree with the investigating officer\'s reasons for requesting an extension of time. In this case, the second document, which is...
SUNITA & ORS Vs RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 129 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 279, 337, and 304A, along with the Motor Vehicles Act, Sections 134 and 187, were referenced. The second respondent, the bus driver, exhibited negligence by driving recklessly at high speed on the incorrect side of the road, leading to the accident that r...
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 130 SC

All India Services Act, 1951
Bombay Police Act, 1951
Bombay Police Act, 1951
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952
Constitution of India
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
CrPC Section 156. Police officer’s power to investigate cognizable cases
CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
CrPC Section 196. Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence
CrPC Section 24. Public Prosecutors
Delegation of Powers
Delegation of Powers
Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000
Delhi Laws Act, 1915
Delhi Police Act, 1978
Delhi Police Act, 1978
Electricity Act, 2003
General Clauses Act, 1897
Goa, Daman and Diu (Laws) Regulation, 1962
Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987
Government of India Act, 1935
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991
Government of Part C States Act, 1951
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Indian Stamp (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2001
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Police Act, 1861
Police Act, 1861
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Punjab Laws Act, 1872
Punjab Laws Act, 1872
States Reorganisation Act, 1956

Union of India Vs. Prem Kumar Jain & Ors [1976]130 (28 April 1976)
Satya Dev Bushahri Vs. Padam Dev & Ors [1954] INSC 94 (18 October 1954)

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, specifically Articles 226, 239, and 239AA, establishes that when the executive branch of the Delhi Government makes a decision, the Lieutenant Governor (LG) has the authority to form his own opinion on any matter, which may differ from the decision made by his Ministers. S...
M. REVANNA Vs ANJANAMMA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 131 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court notes that the application to amend the plaint was submitted on September 1, 2008. By that time, both parties had already presented their evidence, and the case was scheduled for final hearing in the Trial Court. If there had indeed been a prior partition of the joint family proper...
GAURAV KUMAR @ MONU Vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 132 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2001, noted that the High Court did not have the opportunity to address the issue of \'juvenility\' because the appellant did not raise this matter before the High Court. Therefore, it is deemed appropria...
VIDYALAKSHMI @ VIDYA & ORS Vs STATE OF KERALA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 133 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, referencing the Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 302, 120B, 114, 379, and 34, has determined that the prosecution has successfully demonstrated that Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were present at the scene of the crime, where Accused No. 3 and the victim were located, and wh...
SRINIVASAN IYENGER AND ANR. Vs BIMLA DEVI AGARWAL & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 134 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court of India, under Article 142 of the Constitution, notes that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably. The Court recognizes that the matter primarily involves a civil dispute, and thus it is appropriate to exercise its powers under Article 142 to achieve justice. The Court p...
GIRIRAJ GARG Vs COAL INDIA LTD. & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 135 SC

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 11, was interpreted by the Court to broaden the scope of the \'Doctrine of Incorporation\'. It determined that a mere general reference to a standard form contract from one party, along with those from trade associations and professional bodies,...
PERRY KANSAGRA Vs SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 136 SC

Headnote :

The Family Courts Act, Family Court Rules, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Rules of 2004, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 are relevant legal frameworks. The Supreme Court notes that in custody and guardianship disputes, a minor child finds themselves in a unique situatio...
ESSAR SHIPPING LTD. Vs THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 137 SC

Headnote :

The problem at hand involves the alleged negligence of a licensed pilot. The Supreme Court has determined that it was a combination of various factors, as concluded by the Committee, and that the issue cannot be solely attributed to negligence by any one individual. The Court noted that it cannot be...
PROF R K VIJAYASARATHY & ANR Vs SUDHA SEETHARAM & ANR

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 138 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 405, 406, 415, and 420 in conjunction with Section 34, is relevant here. In this case, the appellants\' son has initiated a civil lawsuit seeking monetary recovery from the first respondent, which is still ongoing. The first respondent lodged a complaint...
MEHBOOB-UR-REHMAN Vs AHSANUL GHANI

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in accordance with Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, notes that the plaintiff-appellant did not adequately demonstrate his readiness and willingness to fulfill his contractual obligations. The Trial Court made an unwarranted assumption that he had established such readiness...
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 140 SC

Headnote :

The Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009 state that the Supreme Court has noted that workers employed on a daily wage basis cannot receive more casual leave than what is granted to regular Government employees. We agree with the appellant\'s argument that the Government Resolution fr...
ANJALI BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 141 SC

Headnote :

The Right to Information Act of 2005 is at the center of this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the petitioners, who seek transparency and complete disclosure regarding: (a) specific criteria for appointments, and (b) the public announcement of these criteria in advance. The Supreme Court ac...
EZAJHUSSAIN SABDARHUSSAIN & ANR. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, noted that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all rule for establishing the existence of a common intention or prior meetings with a pre-arranged plan. Such intention must be demonstrated through the behavior or circumstances surro...
LALTU GHOSH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 145 SC

Headnote :

The SC stated that the Investigation Officer and the doctor are independent public servants, with no connections to either the accused or the deceased. The Trial Court cannot undermine the credibility of these public officials regarding the dying declaration in the absence of supporting evidence. Th...
MD. ROJALI ALI & ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 146 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 148, 323, and 302 in conjunction with Section 149, applies here. The accused acted as aggressors, arriving in a group at the victim\'s residence, unlawfully entering their homes, and forcibly dragging the deceased outside to brutally attack them with shar...
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs AVTAR CHAND ETC.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 147 SC

Headnote :

The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 states that the appellants failed to pay the respondents the legally mandated minimum wages, instead compensating them with amounts below this threshold. The issue at hand is whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appellants\' writ petitions. The Supreme C...
COMMON CAUSE & ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 149 SC

Headnote :

This Writ of Mandamus requests the following: to compel the Union of India to appoint a permanent Director of the CBI in accordance with the procedures established in Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; to annul the order from the Union of India that appointed Mr. Nageshw...
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs HARJEET SINGH & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, Sections 307 and 324. The Supreme Court found the intention of the Accused/Respondent No. 1 to be evident from his actions and the circumstances surrounding the crime. The prosecution successfully demonstrated that the Accused/Respondent No. 1 attempted to murder the Complaina...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter