Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Hukam Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 105 SC

Anjali Arora Vs. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 111 SC

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Vs FAQUIREY

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 113 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Section 302 and Section 304 Part I, was referenced in a case where the High Court altered the Respondent\'s conviction from Section 302 IPC to Section 304 Part I IPC. The Supreme Court noted that it is undisputed that the Respondent fired the pistol out of...
BUNDI ZILA PETROL PUMP DEALERS ASSOCIATION BUNDI Vs SANYOJAK BUNDI ZILA PETROL MAZDOOR SANGH(B.M.S.)

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 115 SC

Headnote :

The Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 has been addressed by the Supreme Court, which has overturned the decisions made by the Division Bench, the Single Judge, and the Industrial Tribunal. The case is now referred back to the Industrial Tribunal. The Supreme Court has permitted the Appellant to submit...
BAYAJI SAMBHU MALI @ BORATE Vs NAZIR MOHAMMED BALAL ZARI & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 116 SC

Headnote :

The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act of 1948 applies in this case. The appellant is the tenant, while the respondent is the landlord. The Supreme Court determined that the appellant was indeed a tenant of the first respondent. In this situation, there was no requirement for the appellant to...
CHANDRU @ CHANDRASEKARAN Vs STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CB CID AND ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 117 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, noted that both the deceased and the accused were sleeping in the same room, and the deceased\'s death was attributed to a drug overdose. The prosecution failed to convincingly demonstrate that the accused was responsible for ad...
MAHESH DUBE Vs SHIVBODH AND ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 118 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, under Section 456 of the Criminal Procedure Code, has ruled that the respondents/tenants must return possession of the property in question, from which the appellant and his father were forcibly removed, to the appellant within one month of receiving a certified copy of this order...
SUKHPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF PUNJAB

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 119 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34, determined that there was no established motive against the appellant for the murder. It is acknowledged that motive can be significant in cases relying on circumstantial evidence. The key question is whethe...
THE STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Vs RAVINDRA NATH & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 120 SC

Headnote :

In the current appeal, the appellant points to the establishment of a Committee by the Government of India in August 1981, which was tasked with creating uniform guidelines regarding salaries and other conditions for Officers of Indian Banks stationed abroad. Given that the salaries for all Officers...
PARKASH CHAND Vs STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 121 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 376 and 506, was referenced in this case. The trial court based its decision on the testimony of the prosecutrix, who stated that the appellant had threatened her with death if she revealed the incident to anyone. This threat was reportedly connected to a...
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 122 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961 states that the Supreme Court found no error in the Division Bench\'s ruling that overturned the Single Judge\'s order to refund the conversion fee. The petitioner in the writ has made an alternative request for a writ of mandamus, asking the respondents to permit the conv...
SAU. KAMAL SHIVAJI POKARNEKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 123 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court addressed the Indian Penal Code, 1860, specifically Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 in conjunction with Section 34. The Court noted that the Magistrate is not required to assess the merits of the evidence or material supporting the complaint, as it is not the Magistrate\'s role to...
INTERNATIONAL SPIRITS AND WINES ASSOCIATION OF INDIA Vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Headnote :

The Haryana Liquor License (Amendment) Rules 2017, which are part of the Punjab Excise Act of 1914, have been evaluated. According to the majority opinion, Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License (Amendment) Rules 2017, as modified by the Financial Commissioner using the authority granted unde...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter