Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of february 2019

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

VASANT CHEMICALS LIMITED Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD METROPOLITIAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 125 SC

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

Shah Bhojraj Kuverji Oil Mills and Ginning Factory Vs. Subbash Chandra Yograj Sinha [1961] INSC 173 (21 April 1961)

Headnote :

The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Act of 1989, Section 55, states that the Supreme Court noted that the appellant, as the occupant of the premises, although not directly connected to the Board\'s sewer line, ultimately discharges into the Board\'s sewerage system after partial tre...

Read full Judgement

TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY BOARD Vs TNEB-THOZHILALAR AYKKIYA SANGAM

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 126 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Workmen of Gujarat Electricity Board, Baroda Vs. The Gujarat Electricity Board, Baroda [1968] INSC 321 (19 December 1968)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in reference to Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, noted that the Dearness Allowance for the Board\'s employees should be aligned with what the State government provides to its own employees. The Court pointed out that both the Single Judge and the Division Bench...

Read full Judgement

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs C. GIRIJA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 127 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Supreme Court of India, under Article 32 of the Constitution, ruled that the applicant is entitled to receive retirement benefits immediately upon retirement. The Court instructed Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in Writ Petition (C) No. 653 of 2015 to calculate and disburse the retirement benefits to the...

Read full Judgement

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs SURENDRA PUNDLIK GADLING & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 128 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 43D of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, noted that the public prosecutor has the discretion to either agree or disagree with the investigating officer\'s reasons for requesting an extension of time. In this case, the second document, which is...

Read full Judgement

SUNITA & ORS Vs RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 129 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
CrPC Section 173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. [JULY 02, 2018]

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 279, 337, and 304A, along with the Motor Vehicles Act, Sections 134 and 187, were referenced. The second respondent, the bus driver, exhibited negligence by driving recklessly at high speed on the incorrect side of the road, leading to the accident that r...

Read full Judgement

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 130 SC

All India Services Act, 1951
Bombay Police Act, 1951
Bombay Police Act, 1951
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952
Constitution of India
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
CrPC Section 156. Police officer’s power to investigate cognizable cases
CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
CrPC Section 196. Prosecution for offences against the State and for criminal conspiracy to commit such offence
CrPC Section 24. Public Prosecutors
Delegation of Powers
Delegation of Powers
Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000
Delhi Laws Act, 1915
Delhi Police Act, 1978
Delhi Police Act, 1978
Electricity Act, 2003
General Clauses Act, 1897
Goa, Daman and Diu (Laws) Regulation, 1962
Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987
Government of India Act, 1935
Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991
Government of Part C States Act, 1951
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Government of Union Territories Act, 1963
Indian Administrative Service (Cadre) Rules, 1954
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Indian Stamp (Delhi Amendment) Act, 2001
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Police Act, 1861
Police Act, 1861
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Punjab Laws Act, 1872
Punjab Laws Act, 1872
States Reorganisation Act, 1956

Union of India Vs. Prem Kumar Jain & Ors [1976]130 (28 April 1976)
Satya Dev Bushahri Vs. Padam Dev & Ors [1954] INSC 94 (18 October 1954)

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, specifically Articles 226, 239, and 239AA, establishes that when the executive branch of the Delhi Government makes a decision, the Lieutenant Governor (LG) has the authority to form his own opinion on any matter, which may differ from the decision made by his Ministers. S...

Read full Judgement

M. REVANNA Vs ANJANAMMA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 131 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court notes that the application to amend the plaint was submitted on September 1, 2008. By that time, both parties had already presented their evidence, and the case was scheduled for final hearing in the Trial Court. If there had indeed been a prior partition of the joint family proper...

Read full Judgement

GAURAV KUMAR @ MONU Vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 132 SC

CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2001, noted that the High Court did not have the opportunity to address the issue of \'juvenility\' because the appellant did not raise this matter before the High Court. Therefore, it is deemed appropria...

Read full Judgement

VIDYALAKSHMI @ VIDYA & ORS Vs STATE OF KERALA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 133 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 114. Abettor present when offence is committed
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 379. Punishment for theft

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, referencing the Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 302, 120B, 114, 379, and 34, has determined that the prosecution has successfully demonstrated that Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were present at the scene of the crime, where Accused No. 3 and the victim were located, and wh...

Read full Judgement

SRINIVASAN IYENGER AND ANR. Vs BIMLA DEVI AGARWAL & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 134 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy

Gian Singh Vs. The State of Punjab [1961] INSC 351 (11 December 1961)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court of India, under Article 142 of the Constitution, notes that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably. The Court recognizes that the matter primarily involves a civil dispute, and thus it is appropriate to exercise its powers under Article 142 to achieve justice. The Court p...

Read full Judgement

GIRIRAJ GARG Vs COAL INDIA LTD. & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 135 SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 11, was interpreted by the Court to broaden the scope of the \'Doctrine of Incorporation\'. It determined that a mere general reference to a standard form contract from one party, along with those from trade associations and professional bodies,...

Read full Judgement

PERRY KANSAGRA Vs SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 136 SC

Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Family Courts Act, 1984
Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2004
Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2004

Headnote :

The Family Courts Act, Family Court Rules, Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Rules of 2004, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 are relevant legal frameworks. The Supreme Court notes that in custody and guardianship disputes, a minor child finds themselves in a unique situatio...

Read full Judgement

ESSAR SHIPPING LTD. Vs THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 137 SC

Headnote :

The problem at hand involves the alleged negligence of a licensed pilot. The Supreme Court has determined that it was a combination of various factors, as concluded by the Committee, and that the issue cannot be solely attributed to negligence by any one individual. The Court noted that it cannot be...

Read full Judgement

PROF R K VIJAYASARATHY & ANR Vs SUDHA SEETHARAM & ANR

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 138 SC

CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 405. Criminal breach of trust
IPC Section 406. Punishment for criminal breach of trust
IPC Section 415. Cheating
IPC Section 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 405, 406, 415, and 420 in conjunction with Section 34, is relevant here. In this case, the appellants\' son has initiated a civil lawsuit seeking monetary recovery from the first respondent, which is still ongoing. The first respondent lodged a complaint...

Read full Judgement

MEHBOOB-UR-REHMAN Vs AHSANUL GHANI

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 139 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Specific Relief Act, 1963

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in accordance with Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, notes that the plaintiff-appellant did not adequately demonstrate his readiness and willingness to fulfill his contractual obligations. The Trial Court made an unwarranted assumption that he had established such readiness...

Read full Judgement

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs PWD AND FOREST EMPLOYEES UNION & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 140 SC

Headnote :

The Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009 state that the Supreme Court has noted that workers employed on a daily wage basis cannot receive more casual leave than what is granted to regular Government employees. We agree with the appellant\'s argument that the Government Resolution fr...

Read full Judgement

ANJALI BHARDWAJ AND OTHERS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 141 SC

Constitution of India
Right to Information Act, 2005

Headnote :

The Right to Information Act of 2005 is at the center of this Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the petitioners, who seek transparency and complete disclosure regarding: (a) specific criteria for appointments, and (b) the public announcement of these criteria in advance. The Supreme Court ac...

Read full Judgement

EZAJHUSSAIN SABDARHUSSAIN & ANR. Vs STATE OF GUJARAT

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 142 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, noted that there cannot be a one-size-fits-all rule for establishing the existence of a common intention or prior meetings with a pre-arranged plan. Such intention must be demonstrated through the behavior or circumstances surro...

Read full Judgement

KRIPAL SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 143 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 324. Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means

Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [DECEMBER 2, 2016]
Krishna Mochi & Ors Vs. State of Bihar [2002] INSC 202 (15 April 2002)
Gangadhar Behera & Ors Vs. State of Orissa [2002] INSC 434 (10 October 2002)
Gurcharan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1993] INSC 505 (25 November 1993)
Balaka Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1975] INSC 97 (16 April 1975)
Charan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1974] INSC 129 (26 July 1974)
Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1962] INSC 229 (10 August 1962)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, has determined that the prosecution has established its case against the accused/appellant beyond a reasonable doubt. The injury inflicted on the deceased\'s head, which was attributed to the appellant, was sufficient to cause d...

Read full Judgement

TAMIL NADU POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD Vs STERLITE INDUSTRIES (I) LTD. & ORS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 144 SC

Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
Competition Act, 2002
Constitution of India
Customs Act, 1962
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977

L. Chandra Kumar Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1994] INSC 630 (2 December 1994)
L. Chandra Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors [1994] INSC 633 (2 December 1994)
State of Gujarat Vs. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal & Ors [1979] INSC 145 (8 August 1979)
State of Gujarat & Ors Vs. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal & Ors [1976] INSC 43 (9 March 1976)
Ganga Bai Vs. Vijay Kumar & Ors [1974] INSC 85 (9 April 1974)

Headnote :

The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, and the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 are referenced. The Supreme Court has determined that an order issued by the State Government under Section 18 of the Water Act, which is not...

Read full Judgement

LALTU GHOSH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 145 SC

Headnote :

The SC stated that the Investigation Officer and the doctor are independent public servants, with no connections to either the accused or the deceased. The Trial Court cannot undermine the credibility of these public officials regarding the dying declaration in the absence of supporting evidence. Th...

Read full Judgement

MD. ROJALI ALI & ORS. Vs THE STATE OF ASSAM

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 146 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 148, 323, and 302 in conjunction with Section 149, applies here. The accused acted as aggressors, arriving in a group at the victim\'s residence, unlawfully entering their homes, and forcibly dragging the deceased outside to brutally attack them with shar...

Read full Judgement

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs AVTAR CHAND ETC.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 147 SC

Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Minimum Wages Act, 1948

Headnote :

The Minimum Wages Act of 1948 states that the appellants failed to pay the respondents the legally mandated minimum wages, instead compensating them with amounts below this threshold. The issue at hand is whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appellants\' writ petitions. The Supreme C...

Read full Judgement

BALVIR SINGH & ORS Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 148 SC

CrPC Section 110. Security for good behaviour from habitual offenders
CrPC Section 174. Police to enquire and report on suicide, etc
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 341. Punishment for wrongful restraint.

Ramanand Yadav Vs. Prabhu Nath Jha & Ors [2003] INSC 545 (31 October 2003)
Noor Mohammad Mohd. Yusuf Momin Vs. State of Maharashtra [1970] INSC 73 (24 March 1970)

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, specifically Sections 302, 341, and the Arms Act, Section 25(1A) in conjunction with Section 27, were referenced in the case involving the deceased Mohan and accused No. 1, who both worked for the railways. There was animosity between them concerning financial dealings. The Su...

Read full Judgement

COMMON CAUSE & ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 149 SC

Constitution of India
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
General Clauses Act, 1897
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013
Right to Information Act, 2005

Union of India Vs. Namit Sharma [September 03, 2013]

Headnote :

This Writ of Mandamus requests the following: to compel the Union of India to appoint a permanent Director of the CBI in accordance with the procedures established in Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; to annul the order from the Union of India that appointed Mr. Nageshw...

Read full Judgement

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs HARJEET SINGH & ANR.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

Gwalior
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 307. Attempt to murder

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, Sections 307 and 324. The Supreme Court found the intention of the Accused/Respondent No. 1 to be evident from his actions and the circumstances surrounding the crime. The prosecution successfully demonstrated that the Accused/Respondent No. 1 attempted to murder the Complaina...

Read full Judgement

THANGASAMY Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 151 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 279. Rash driving or riding on a public way
IPC Section 337. Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others
IPC Section 338. Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others

State of Karnataka Vs. Muralidhar [2009] INSC 533 (16 March 2009)

Headnote :

Sections 279, 337 (three counts), and 304-A (four counts) of the Indian Penal Code were invoked. It was argued that the High Court overlooked parts of the testimonies of PW-4 and PW-5. The Supreme Court found that the appellant was guilty of rash and negligent driving, resulting in the deaths of fou...

Read full Judgement

WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE TRICHY/MADURAI

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 152 SC

Central Excise Act, 1944

Headnote :

The Central Excise Act of 1944, Section 11B, addresses the issue of whether the six-month limitation period applies when a buyer claims a refund of central excise duty that was paid under protest by the manufacturer, M/s. Fenner (India) Ltd. The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, who purchased...

Read full Judgement

LMJ INTERNATIONAL LTD. Vs SLEEPWELL INDUSTRIES CO. LTD

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Headnote :

According to Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Supreme Court ruled that the petitioner\'s application should be dismissed due to the principle of constructive res judicata. The court emphasized that there is limited scope for interference regarding foreign awards un...

Read full Judgement

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX SHIMLA Vs M/S. AARHAM SOFTRONICS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 154 SC

Finance Act, 2003

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, referencing the Finance Act of 2003 and the Finance Act of 1991, notes that if a significant expansion occurs as defined in clause (ix) of sub-section (8) of Section 80-IC by an undertaking or enterprise within the specified 10-year period, the year in which this substantial expan...

Read full Judgement

SMT. SUNITA DEVI AND ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 155 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 109 in conjunction with Section 34. The petitioners submitted this writ petition seeking the establishment of a court-monitored investigation/Special Investigation Team (SIT) to re-examine the cases related to FIR Nos. 221 of 2001 and 228 of 2002, which wer...

Read full Judgement

RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LIMITED & ORS. Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 156 SC

Constitution of India
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

The State of Bihar Vs. Rani Sonabati Kumari [1960] INSC 155 (20 September 1960)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Chairpersons of Reliance Communications Ltd., Reliance Telecom Ltd., and Reliance Infratel Ltd. have violated the commitments made to the court and its associated orders under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court has ordered the Chairman of Relianc...

Read full Judgement

RIYA GEORGE Vs KANNUR MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ORS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 157 SC

Headnote :

Article 32 of the Constitution. The petitioner, a medical student, filed a petition under Article 32 requesting compensation for the loss of an academic year. The Supreme Court ruled that it cannot determine damages in this case, as quantifying damages in monetary terms would impact the ongoing proc...

Read full Judgement

MAHENDRAN Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 158 SC

Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 141. Unlawful assembly
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder

Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [DECEMBER 2, 2016]
State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh [2004] Insc 583 (27 September 2004)
Lehna Vs. State of Haryana [2002] INSC28 (22 January 2002)
Krishna Mochi & Ors Vs. State of Bihar [2002] INSC 202 (15 April 2002)
State of U.P. Vs. Dan Singh & Ors [1997] INSC 109 (3 February 1997)
Gurcharan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1993] INSC 505 (25 November 1993)
Balaka Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1975] INSC 97 (16 April 1975)
Charan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1974] INSC 129 (26 July 1974)
State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh & Ors [1973] INSC 131 (6 August 1973)
Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1962] INSC 229 (10 August 1962)

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, in relation to Indian Penal Code Sections 302 and 326 in conjunction with Section 149, determined that the appellants shared a common objective in setting fire to the deceased\'s hut and assaulting the deceased with aruvals (sickles) due to the deceased\'s involvement in Panchayat...

Read full Judgement

BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF KOLKATA AND ORS. Vs APL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 159 SC

Major Port Trusts Act, 1963
Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971

Headnote :

Section 6 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 addresses the issue of the appellants, \"Port Trust,\" regarding their authority to seize and sell goods and materials located on the \"public premises\" as per the PP Act. The Estate Officer, according to Section 6, has...

Read full Judgement

SANJAY SINGH AND ANR. Vs. CENTRAL HIMALAYAN LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 160 SC

Headnote :

The High Court\'s decision to condone a delay of 721 days was deemed inappropriate due to the lack of a satisfactory explanation. The respondent exhibited gross negligence, and the justification provided for the request for condonation was found to be incorrect. It was claimed that the complaint aga...

Read full Judgement

NAGRAJ Vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 161 SC

Probation of Offenders Act, 1958
Railways Act, 1989

Headnote :

Section 160(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 states that the offense in question does not pose a threat to society, lacks moral turpitude, and has not resulted in any harm or injury to individuals, aside from some damage to railway property. Given that the offense is now 13 years old, the Supreme Court...

Read full Judgement

JAGDISH Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 162 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, Section 302. The Supreme Court noted a significant, unjustified delay by the State of Madhya Pradesh, which has failed to submit a counter affidavit in the Writ Petition. The state has not provided any explanation for the over four-year delay in processing the petition. The Co...

Read full Judgement

Lullu Vas (D) through LRS. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 163 SC

Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Read full Judgement

Sanjay K. Dixit Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

ccc
Constitution of India

Read full Judgement

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Dhruv Gurjar

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 165 SC

CrPC Section 161. Examination of witnesses by police
CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
CrPC Section 8. Metropolitan areas
CrPC Section 82. Proclamation for person absconding
Gwalior
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 15. British India
IPC Section 307. Attempt to murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 394. Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery

Read full Judgement

Anil Kumar Vs. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 166 SC

Read full Judgement

Raju Vs. State of Haryana

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 167 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007

Read full Judgement

Vinod Jain Vs. Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 168 SC

Rajasthan Medical Act, 1952

Read full Judgement

K. Amarnath Reddy Vs. Chairman & Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 169 SC

Read full Judgement

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (UHBVNL) Vs. Adani Power Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 170 SC

Central Excise Act, 1944
Customs Act, 1962
Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Electricity Act, 2003
Sale of Goods Act, 1930
Special Economic Zones Act, 2005

Indian Council For Enviro-Legal Action Vs. Union of India & Ors [1996] INSC 244 (13 February 1996)

Read full Judgement

Subhash Chand Vs. State of Punjab

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 171 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 279. Rash driving or riding on a public way

State of Karnataka Vs. Muralidhar [2009] INSC 533 (16 March 2009)

Read full Judgement

Deep Narayan Chourasia Vs. State of Bihar

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 172 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder

Read full Judgement

Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit Vs. Taluka Tokrekoli (Ambiga Samaji C. Vikas Sangh Indi) (Earlier Gangamath Sangha)

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 173 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Read full Judgement

Murugan Vs. Kesava Gounder (D) through LRS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 174 SC

Guardians and Wards Act, 1890
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
Indian Succession Act, 1925
Limitation Act, 1963
Section 19. TPA, Vested interest.
Section 21. TPA, Contingent interest.

Read full Judgement

«
1
2
3
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs