Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of november 1956

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Dwarka Dass Bhatia Vs. The State of Jammu and Kashmir [1956] INSC 64 (1 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 01 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner was detained under a detention order issued by the District Magistrate of Jammu, in accordance with section 3(2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 2011. This order was subsequently confirmed and extended by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir under section 12(1) of th...

Read full Judgement

Fruit and Vegetable Merchants Union Vs. Delhi Improvement Trust [1956] INSC 65 (6 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 06 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 65 SC

Section 108. TPA, Rights and liabilities of lessor and lessee.

Headnote :

According to an agreement, the Government allocated certain lands for the Improvement Trust to build a market. The Trust constructed the market using funds provided by the Government as a loan with interest. As per the agreement, the Trust was required to pay a fixed amount as revenue for the proper...

Read full Judgement

Central Provinces Transport Services Ltd. Vs. Raghunath Gopal Patwardhan [1956] INSC 66 (6 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 06 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 66 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

In June 1950, the appellant company\'s goods were stolen, leading to an investigation that resulted in the respondent\'s dismissal for gross negligence and misconduct.He faced theft charges but was acquitted in March 1952. Subsequently, he applied to the Labour Commissioner for reinstatement and com...

Read full Judgement

Karnani Properties Ltd. Vs. August in [1956] INSC 67 (9 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 09 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was the common landlord of three properties involved in similar proceedings initiated by the respective tenants seeking standardization of rent under section 9 in conjunction with Schedule A of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control (Temporary Provisions) Act of 1950. According to the l...

Read full Judgement

Mohammad Afzal Khan Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir [1956] INSC 68 (13 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 13 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 68 SC

Headnote :

Section 14 of the Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act does not explicitly require the issuance of a formal order, and there is no basis for arguing that the Government\'s decision to extend a detention order must be communicated to the detainee within three months of their detention.This prin...

Read full Judgement

Abdul Jabar Butt Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir [1956] INSC 69 (13 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 13 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 69 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The two petitioners were arrested under Section 3(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act on April 26, 1956, to prevent them from engaging in activities harmful to the security of the State. They were not informed of the reasons for their detention as required by Section 8(1) of the Act...

Read full Judgement

Baroda Borough Municipality Vs. Its Workmen [1956] INSC 70 (13 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 13 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

D. N. Banerji Vs. P. R. Mukherjee & Ors [1952] INSC 67 (5 December 1952)

Headnote :

The Baroda Electric Supply Concern was owned and operated by the State of Baroda. Just prior to the merger of the State with the Province of Bombay, the State gifted the Concern to the Baroda Municipality to establish a new revenue source, as state aid might not continue post-merger. In 1951, worker...

Read full Judgement

Chief Commissioner, Ajmer Vs. Radhey Shyam Dani [1956] INSC 71 (15 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 15 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 71 SC

Representation of the People Act, 1950

Headnote :

Sub-section (2) of Section 30 of the Ajmer-Merwara Municipalities Regulation, 1925, as amended, states that \"any individual who is eligible to be registered in the electoral roll for a Parliamentary Constituency under the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (XLIII of 1950), as if that Constituen...

Read full Judgement

Rajes Kanta Roy Vs. Santi Debi [1956] INSC 72 (19 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 19 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 72 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Indian Succession Act, 1925
Section 19. TPA, Vested interest.
Section 21. TPA, Contingent interest.
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Headnote :

A settlor executed a deed of trust concerning all his properties, arranging for the settlement of his debts and the transfer of property to his sons. The deed specified that (1) particular lots of property were designated for each of his two sons, (2) the current income was to be used to pay off the...

Read full Judgement

Kalua Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1956] INSC 73 (21 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 21 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 73 SC

Headnote :

Daya Ram was murdered by being shot with a homemade pistol. The circumstantial evidence against the accused included: (1) a motive for the murder, (2) a threat made by the accused to kill the victim three days prior, (3) the discovery of cartridge Ex. I near the victim\'s cot, and (4) the accused re...

Read full Judgement

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. Vs. State of Saurashtra [1956] INSC 74 (23 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 23 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Constitution of India
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The appellants were lessees who held a license to manufacture salt on the leased lands. The salt was produced by a group of skilled laborers known as agarias, using rainwater that mixed with the saline soil. This work was seasonal, starting in October after the rains and continuing until June.After...

Read full Judgement

Hariprasad Shivshankar Shukla Vs. A.D. Divikar [1956] INSC 75 (27 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 27 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Payment of Wages Act, 1936
Payment of Wages Act, 1936

Headnote :

The term \'retrenchment\' as defined in section 2(oo) and the term \'retrenchment\' in section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, amended by Act XLIII of 1953, does not carry a broader meaning than its commonly accepted definition. It refers to the termination of surplus labor or staff by the...

Read full Judgement

A. S. Krishna Vs. State of, Madras [1956] INSC 76 (28 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 76 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 432. Power to suspend or remit sentences
Government of India Act, 1935

Headnote :

The appellants faced charges before the Presidency Magistrate for violations of the Madras Prohibition Act, 1937. During the trial, they contended that Sections 4(2) and 28 to 32 of the Act were invalid under Section 107(I) of the Government of India Act, 1935, as they conflicted with the Indian Evi...

Read full Judgement

Banaras Ice Factory Limited Vs. Its Workmen [1956] INSC 77 (28 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

The Automobile Products of India Ltd. Vs. Rukmaji Bala & Ors [1955] INSC 4 (3 February 1955)

Headnote :

Clause (b) of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 states that while an appeal is pending under the Act, no employer may terminate the employment of any workers involved in that appeal, unless they have received explicit written permission from the Appellate Tribunal....

Read full Judgement

Mohammad Ghouse Vs. State of Andhra [1956] INSC 78 (29 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 29 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The appellant was serving as a Subordinate Judge in Masulipatam and Amalapuram during the relevant period. He faced allegations of bribery and significant misconduct in his official duties, which were investigated by a judge from the Madras High Court. The judge submitted reports on August 20, 1953,...

Read full Judgement

Surendra Nath Khosla Vs. Dalip Singh [1956] INSC 79 (29 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 29 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 79 SC

Headnote :

Twelve candidates submitted their nomination papers for election in a double-member constituency for the State Assembly, with one seat reserved for Scheduled Castes. The thumb impressions of the candidate\'s proposer and seconder were supposed to be attested by a magistrate designated by the Electio...

Read full Judgement

Lalit Mohan Das Vs. Advocate-General, Orissa [1956] INSC 80 (29 November 1956)

Judgement Date : 29 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 80 SC

Legal Practitioners Act, 1879

Headnote :

The appellant\'s lawyer, who already had a contentious relationship with the Munsif, made some inappropriate comments in open court that implied bias and unfairness on the Munsif\'s part.In response, the Munsif initiated proceedings under sections 13 and 14 of the Legal Practitioners Act, 1879, agai...

Read full Judgement

«
1
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs