2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Niranjan Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1956] INSC 52 (3 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 03 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

CrPC Section 173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 396. Dacoity with murder

Headnote :

Rule 109 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations, which pertains to crime investigations, requires police officers to record the time and location where an investigation concludes at the end of each day. Additionally, it mandates that the investigation diary be submitted daily to the Superintendent...

Read full Judgement

Deoki Nandan Vs. Murlidhar [1956] INSC 53 (4 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 04 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 53 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The question of whether a religious endowment is classified as public or private involves both legal and factual considerations. The resolution of this issue relies on applying the legal definitions of public and private endowments to the established facts, and it is subject to review by the Supreme...

Read full Judgement

Laxmi Devi Sugar Mills Vs. Nand Kishore Singh [1956] INSC 54 (4 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 04 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 54 SC

Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The respondent, who served as a steno typist and was the Vice-President of the Labour Union, faced charges from the appellant for misconduct and indiscipline under clause L(1)(j) of the Standing Orders of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. The charges stemmed from allegations that he incited the worke...

Read full Judgement

Rohtas Industries Ltd. Vs. Brijnandan Pandey [1956] INSC 55 (11 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 11 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The inquiry under section 22 of the Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 focuses on whether there is a prima facie case for the proposed termination of the worker, and whether the employer has engaged in any unfair practices or victimization.While an Industrial Tribunal has the authori...

Read full Judgement

Burn & Co., Calcutta Vs. Their Employees [1956] INSC 56 (11 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 11 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India

Headnote :

An award from an Industrial Tribunal is designed to remain effective for a long duration and can only be revisited under section 19(6) of the Industrial Disputes Act-XIV of 1947 if there has been a significant change in the circumstances that formed the basis of the award.To rule otherwise would und...

Read full Judgement

Clerks of Calcutta Tramways Vs. Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd. [1956] INSC 57 (11 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 11 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 57 SC

Headnote :

It is firmly established that a Tribunal\'s decisions regarding factual matters are conclusive, and the Supreme Court will only intervene in instances where (1) the Tribunal exceeds the jurisdiction granted to it by the relevant statute or regulation, or fails to exercise a clear jurisdiction; (2) t...

Read full Judgement

In Re: Shri 'M', An Advocate of the Supreme Court of India. Vs. [1956] INSC 58 (17 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 17 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Headnote :

Summary: Shri \'M\', who was an Agent of the Supreme Court, filed a criminal appeal and subsequently became an Advocate on record following the new court rules that took effect on January 26, 1954. He received Rs. 750 from his client for the costs of printing the Paper Book and deposited it in the P...

Read full Judgement

Bipin Chander Jaisinghbhai Shah Vs. Prabhawati [1956] INSC 59 (19 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 19 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Headnote :

The couple married in 1942 and had a child together. In 1947, the appellant traveled to England for business, and upon returning to India, he found that his wife (the respondent) had been engaging in romantic correspondence with a man named M. When confronted, she could not provide a satisfactory ex...

Read full Judgement

Raja Rajinder Chand Vs. Sukhi [1956] INSC 60 (23 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 23 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The appellant, as the owner of Nada-un Jagir, initiated a lawsuit to assert his claim over the chil (pine) trees located on lands that, while part of the Jagir, were owned by the respondents. He argued that the trees rightfully belonged to him as ala malik (superior landlord) and not to the responde...

Read full Judgement

Pipraich Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Pipraich Sugar Mills Mazdoor Union [1956] INSC 61 (23 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 23 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company was unable to operate its mills at full capacity due to a shortage of sugarcane and received government approval to sell its machinery, while still continuing to crush cane under a lease from the buyer.In an effort to obstruct this transaction, the workers\' union decided to st...

Read full Judgement

Lakshmi Devi Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Pt. Ram Sarup [1956] INSC 62 (24 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 24 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

The Automobile Products of India Ltd. Vs. Rukmaji Bala & Ors [1955] INSC 4 (3 February 1955)

Headnote :

Seventy-six employees of the appellant company initiated a tools-down strike in support of a co-worker who had been dismissed.After multiple unsuccessful attempts to convince them to return to work, the General Manager suspended the workers until further notice. Following the midday break, managemen...

Read full Judgement

Raja Bahadur Motilal Poona Mills Vs. Tukaram Piraji Masale [1956] INSC 63 (31 October 1956)

Judgement Date : 31 Oct 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946

Headnote :

According to section 97(1)(c) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946:\"A strike is deemed illegal if it is initiated or continued solely because the employer has failed to implement the provisions of any standing order or has made an unlawful change.\"The management of the appellant Mill, wish...

Read full Judgement