Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Ram Krishan & ANR Vs. The State of Delhi [1956] INSC 16 (9 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 09 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were suspected of exporting potatoes at reduced rates based on false declarations, prompting the assignment of Madan Lal, a Railway Officer, to assist the Police with the investigation. During this investigation, the appellants attempted to bribe Madan Lal to suppress the case, but he...
Shambu Nath Mehra Vs. The State of Ajmer [1956] INSC 17 (12 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellant faced trial under section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1947 for allegedly obtaining a total of Rs. 23-12-0 from the Government as travel allowance, representing second class railway fares for two journeys: one from Ajmer to Abu Ro...
Wasim Khan Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1956] INSC 18 (12 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The appellant received a death sentence for the murder of an individual and an additional seven years of rigorous imprisonment for robbing the deceased of his belongings. Evidence presented in court established that the victim, a shopkeeper from the village of Jarwal, had traveled to Lucknow to buy...
Vemireddy Satyanarayan Reddy and Three Others Vs. The State of Hyderabad [1956] INSC 20 (14 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 14 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

There is no justification for the extreme claim that if a person witnesses a crime and fails to report it, he could be legally considered an accomplice and face charges alongside the actual offenders.A person may be present at a crime scene and, if not actively assisting or encouraging the crime, ca...
The Commissioner of Income Tax and Excess Profits Tax Vs. The South India Pictures Ltd. [1956] INSC 21 (14 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 14 Nov 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

The assessee, a private limited company, was engaged in the business of film distribution. In certain cases, the company would either produce or purchase films and subsequently distribute them for exhibition in various cinema halls. In other instances, the company would provide financial support to...
Raman & Raman Ltd. Vs. The State of Madras & ANR [1956] INSC 22 (15 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 15 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and respondent No. 2, along with others, applied for stage-carriage permits for two different routes. The Regional Transport Authority granted a permit for one route to the appellant and for the other route to respondent No. 2.Both parties appealed to the Central Road Traffic Board, bu...
Bidi Supply Co. Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1956] INSC 23 (20 March 1956)

Judgement Date : 20 Mar 1956

Citation : 1956 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners\' registered firm is headquartered in Calcutta, where it maintains its accounting records and banking account, with all members being Indian citizens. Since its establishment, the firm has consistently been assessed for income tax by the Income-Tax Officer of District III, Calcutta....
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter