Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
SOUTH EAST ASIA MARINE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. OIL INDIA LIMITED

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 366 SC

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 34, addresses the annulment of arbitral awards and the interpretation of arbitral agreements. In this case, a contract was formed between the parties as part of a tender issued by the respondent for drilling wells and related operations. After re...
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEUMS, JAIPUR vs. ASHISH GAUTAM

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 367 SC

Headnote :

The National Green Tribunal Act of 2010, Section 22, states that the Department of Archaeology has designated the monument \"Sisodia Rani ka Bagh\" as a protected site through a notification. This monument has historically hosted ceremonies such as weddings and other events. It features exquisite fo...
FOUNDATION FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 368 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEThe Court has ordered the formation of a Special Committee to assess the possibility of implementing faster internet services, specifically 3G and 4G, in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.According to the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules...
CLP INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 357 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 43A of the Electricity Act, 2003, regarding the supply of electricity and tariff, the parties entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) that specifically referenced the notification dated 30.03.1992. The PPA stipulated that for the first Kwh/KW, a plant load factor of 68.5% woul...
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. ATMANAND SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 358 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn cases where a writ petition presents complex factual questions, the High Court should refrain from considering such petitions.According to Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, regarding writ jurisdiction and the exercise of power, when a petition involves intricate factual issue...
HUKUM CHAND DESWAL vs. SATISH RAJ DESWAL

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 359 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Court Act, 1971, Sections 12 and 14, along with the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975, Rule 3, address contempt of court issues. In this case, the defendant vacated the suit premises before the date set by the Court. However, the plaintiff\'s conte...
KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 360 SC

Headnote :

The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act of 1976, specifically Sections 22(1)(a) and 21, addresses surplus land and exemptions. In this case, the appellant\'s excess land was acquired by the State, which issued a notice and took possession as documented in a possession panchnama. The appellants c...
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU KAKINADA vs. M/S GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 361 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe High Court cannot overlook the statutory time frame for addressing grievances and cannot automatically accept a writ petition.A. Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Assessment - Challenge - Limitation - The petitioner opted to approach the High Court after t...
RATNAGIRI NAGAR PARISHAD vs. GANGARAM NARAYAN AMBEKAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 362 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 41(f) and (h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000, the issue of land allocation for a waste disposal project arises. The plaintiff initiated a lawsuit to prevent the defendants from commencing the Solid Waste Disposa...
BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION vs. ARUN KUMAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 364 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn the context of assessing candidates for recruitment to public services, the scope of judicial review is limited.A. Candidate Evaluation - Judicial Review - When it comes to the assessment of candidates, especially for public service recruitment, the scope of judicial review is restricted....
TRILOKI NATH SINGH vs. ANIRUDH SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 365 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe prohibition under Order 23, Rule 3A regarding the challenge of a decree based on a compromise between the parties also extends to individuals who are not part of the compromise proceedings. This rule aims to prevent multiple litigations.A. According to the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or...
PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE vs. VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED

Judgement Date : 05 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 356 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe recovery process outlined in Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act applies to Cooperative Banks.The Reserve Bank of India exercises significant and comprehensive control over primary credit societies engaged in banking activities.Co-operative banks, whether established under State legislation or...
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III vs. M/S UNI PRODUCTS INDIA LTD.

Judgement Date : 01 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 355 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEExcise Duty - Car Matting and Carpets - Chapter 57 encompasses not only carpets but also various other types of floor coverings.A. Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 38A - Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Chapter 57, First Schedule - Car matting - Is it classified as a carpet? Chapter 57 includ...
CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 348 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe rights under Article 30 are not absolute - the NEET examination does not infringe upon the rights granted by Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.According to the Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 19(1)(g), 25, 26, and 30, as well as Section 33 of the Medical Council Act, 19...
VODAFONE IDEA LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 349 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 143(1D) and 241A, the issue of refunds is addressed. The assessee submitted tax returns for the assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18, each claiming a refund. The tax department notified the assessee about the withholding o...
QUIPPO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT LTD. vs. JANARDAN NIRMAN PVT. LTD.

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 350 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTIf a party fails to appear in proceedings and the case proceeds ex parte, it forfeits its right to contest the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator after the award has been made.According to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically Sections 5, 8, and 34, regarding the jurisdiction...
NEELAM GUPTA VS. MAHIPAL SHARAN GUPTA

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 352 SC

Headnote :

The Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 12 - Right to reside in matrimonial home - Application for modification - The appellant wife was granted a protection order and allowed to live in the matrimonial home. The son of the respondent husband’s first wife initiated a part...
BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED vs. PRADEEP MEHRA

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 353 SC

Headnote :

The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Section 4(3) addresses gratuity entitlement. The respondent was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer of the appellant company under specified terms, which included eligibility for gratuity as per legal provisions. After resigning, the respondent claimed gratuit...
PILCOM vs. C.I.T WEST BENGAL-VII

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 354 SC

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 115BBA, 194E, and 195(2), addresses tax deduction at source. The Assessee in this case is the PAK-INDO-LANKA Joint Management Committee, which was established by the Cricket Control Boards of Pakistan, India, and Sri Lanka to organize the World Cup C...
AISHWARYA ATUL PUSALKAR vs. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING & AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 341 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTClaims for rehousing made by a wife must be resolved by a Civil Court, Family Court, or any other legally designated forum; a Writ Court is not the suitable venue for such matters.A. According to Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, and Section 2(s) of the Protection...
STATE OF GUJARAT vs. MANSUKHBHAI KANJIBHAI SHAH

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 342 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe term \"University\" includes \"Deemed University\" and is subject to the Prevention of Corruption Act.A. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Sections 7, 8, 10, and 13 (1)(b) and 13(2), along with the Indian Penal Code, 1860,...
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) KOLKATA vs. M/S. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 343 SC

Headnote :

The Customs Act of 1962, Section 14, pertains to Customs Valuation, specifically the Valuation Rules for Imported Goods established in 1988, particularly Rules 4 and 9(1)(e). In this case, Steel Authority of India Ltd imported certain items and asserted that the importation involved turnkey projects...
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER vs. M/S BOMBAY MACHINERY STORE

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 344 SC

Headnote :

The Central Sales Tax Act of 1956, specifically Sections 3 and 6, along with Section 51 of the Sale of Goods Act of 1930 and the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act of 1954, state that the transfer of documents of title occurs after the goods have arrived at their destination within the state. When goods are ha...
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD vs. M/S ICEBERG INDUSTRIES LTD.

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 345 SC

Headnote :

The Electricity Act of 2003, Section 56, addresses the disconnection of electricity due to non-payment of bills by a company. A disconnection notice was issued because the company failed to pay its electricity bill. The company, citing various business-related challenges, requested to settle its out...
DHANPAL vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 346 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302 in conjunction with Section 34 pertains to murder convictions. The accused individuals were alleged to have killed the victim, with all four participating in the attack. Three of the accused restrained the victim while one inflicted stab wounds to the chest,...
STATE OF KARNATAKA vs. Y. MOIDEEN KUNHI

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 347 SC

Headnote :

The Karnataka Land Reforms Act of 1961, specifically Sections 79 and 104, along with the Karnataka Preservation of Trees Act of 1976, addresses the issue of land designated for plantations and the restrictions on land holdings. The lower courts determined that the lands classified as plantation were...
YUM!RESTAURANTS (MARKET.) PVT.LTD. vs. C.I.T.,NEW DELHI

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 323 SC

Headnote :

A. Doctrine of Mutuality - Interpretation - The doctrine of mutuality is based on the fundamental principle that an individual cannot conduct business with themselves. Consequently, if the seller and buyer, or the vendor and consumer, or the contributor and participant are essentially the same entit...
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 325 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe Transit Marine Insurance Policy only covers risks related to the transportation of goods; it does not include coverage for the storage and unpacking of cargo.A. Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 23 - Transit Marine Insurance Policy - Deficiency in service - The respondent acquired...
BASIR AHMED SISODIA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 326 SC

Headnote :

Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 24 and 68 - Cash credit - Deduction - The factual basis on which the Officer formed his opinion in the assessment order regarding the addition of ₹2,26,000 was refuted by affidavits and statements from the relevant unregistered dealers during the penalty proceedings....
SHIVAKUMAR vs. SHARANABASAPPA

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 327 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALRemand orders should not be issued as a matter of course, as unnecessary remands only prolong litigation without advancing the cause of justice.A. Indian Succession Act, 1925, Section 63 - Evidence Act, 1872 Section 68 - Will - Proof - The principles governing the adjudication process regardi...
ASHISH SETH vs. SUMIT MITTAL

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 328 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(c) addresses contempt of court. Criminal proceedings were initiated against the contemnors and others involved, which were part of the subject matter in a Writ Petition (Criminal). The disputes at hand were commercial in nature. Since the controversy revol...
UNION OF INDIA vs. U.A.E.EXCHANGE CENTRE

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 329 SC

Headnote :

The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act of 1973, Section 29(1)(a), and the Income Tax Act of 1961, Sections 5 and 9, pertain to the status of a liaison office as a permanent establishment in India. The respondent company, incorporated in the UAE, provides remittance services to transfer funds from the U...
ANEESH KUMAR V. S. vs. STATE OF KERALA

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 330 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEThe vacancy cannot be filled once the Rank List has expired.A. According to Section 7 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958, a Full Bench is tasked with addressing only the issues referred to it by a Division Bench and should refrain from evaluating the merits of the case itself. However, the Ful...
ARVIND SINGH vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 331 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIf the accused wishes to assert any specific fact that cannot be established from the prosecution\'s evidence, it is the responsibility of the accused to cross-examine the relevant witnesses accordingly.A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 and 364A in conjunction with Section 34 - Murder...
UNION OF INDIA vs. M/S EXIDE INDUSTRIES LTD

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 332 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALWhen assessing the constitutional validity of a provision, the Court must first verify the existence of the enacting power. Once this power is confirmed, the next step is to determine whether the enacted provision infringes upon any rights protected under Part III of the Constitution.Leave en...
FIRM RAJASTHAN UDYOG vs. HINDUSTAN ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD.

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 333 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe execution of an award is limited to what has been granted and cannot extend beyond that.A. Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 17 - An arbitrator\'s award determining the price of land - The viability of a suit for specific performance - An agreement was made between the parties for the sale o...
MOHD. ASIF NASEER vs. WEST WATCH COMPANY THROUGH ITS PROPERTIER

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 334 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTEviction notice, when provided in writing, does not need to be sent exclusively via registered post. The key requirement is that the landlord has issued a notice to the tenant.A. According to the U.P. Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Sections 21(1)(a) and...
SUJATA KOHLI vs. REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 335 SC

Headnote :

A. According to Rule 27 of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970, regarding grading in ACRs and eligibility for promotion, the Administrative and General Supervision Committee of the High Court determined that the position of Principal Judge of the Family Court is equivalent to that of a Dis...
PAUL vs. T. MOHAN

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 336 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Chit Funds Act, 1982, Section 64(1)(A), along with the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89, pertains to the sale of property and the process of setting aside an auction. In this case, the respondent acted as a guarantor for a chit fund taken out by a borrower who failed to make...
KANWAL TANUJ vs. STATE OF BIHAR

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 337 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act of 1946, Section 6, and the Indian Penal Code of 1860, Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, and 471, as well as Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988, the CBI is conducting an investigation into significant corruption and the misapp...
M/S TRIPOWER ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 338 SC

Headnote :

The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13(4) - A borrower obtained financial credit from a bank, and a guarantor provided their immovable property as collateral through a mortgage to the bank. The loan was subsequently classi...
SK. JALALUDDIN vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Judgement Date : 24 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 339 SC

Headnote :

According to Rule 133(1) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Rules, 2011, the applicants were assigned flats within the Society. However, their membership was terminated due to their failure to pay the remaining balance. This decision was communicated to them by the Registrar of Co-operative S...
HIRA SINGH vs. Union of India

Judgement Date : 22 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 318 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALWhen a mixture of Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances is seized alongside one or more neutral substances, the weight of the neutral substances must be included in the assessment of whether the quantity constitutes a \"small or commercial quantity\" of the Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic...
UNION OF INDIA vs. M/S V.V.F.LTD.

Judgement Date : 22 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 320 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTPromissory Estoppel - The principles of promissory estoppel cannot be applied when public interest is at stake.A. Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 5A - Excise Duty - Exemption - The contested Central Excise Exemption Notification involved the government retracting incentives previously off...
WEST U.P. SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 22 Apr 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 321 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALBoth the Central Government and the State Government possess the authority to determine the price of sugarcane.A. According to the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953, Section 16, the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Section 3(2)(c), and the Sugarcane (Control) Order,...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter