Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III vs. M/S UNI PRODUCTS INDIA LTD.

Judgement Date : 01 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 355 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEExcise Duty - Car Matting and Carpets - Chapter 57 encompasses not only carpets but also various other types of floor coverings.A. Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 38A - Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Chapter 57, First Schedule - Car matting - Is it classified as a carpet? Chapter 57 includ...
PANDURANG GANPATI CHAUGULE vs. VISHWASRAO PATIL MURGUD SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED

Judgement Date : 05 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 356 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe recovery process outlined in Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act applies to Cooperative Banks.The Reserve Bank of India exercises significant and comprehensive control over primary credit societies engaged in banking activities.Co-operative banks, whether established under State legislation or...
CLP INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD.

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 357 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 43A of the Electricity Act, 2003, regarding the supply of electricity and tariff, the parties entered into a power purchase agreement (PPA) that specifically referenced the notification dated 30.03.1992. The PPA stipulated that for the first Kwh/KW, a plant load factor of 68.5% woul...
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs. ATMANAND SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 358 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn cases where a writ petition presents complex factual questions, the High Court should refrain from considering such petitions.According to Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, regarding writ jurisdiction and the exercise of power, when a petition involves intricate factual issue...
HUKUM CHAND DESWAL vs. SATISH RAJ DESWAL

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 359 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Court Act, 1971, Sections 12 and 14, along with the Rules to Regulate Proceedings for Contempt of the Supreme Court, 1975, Rule 3, address contempt of court issues. In this case, the defendant vacated the suit premises before the date set by the Court. However, the plaintiff\'s conte...
KAPILABEN AMBALAL PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 360 SC

Headnote :

The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act of 1976, specifically Sections 22(1)(a) and 21, addresses surplus land and exemptions. In this case, the appellant\'s excess land was acquired by the State, which issued a notice and took possession as documented in a possession panchnama. The appellants c...
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) LTU KAKINADA vs. M/S GLAXO SMITH KLINE CONSUMER HEALTH CARE LIMITED

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 361 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe High Court cannot overlook the statutory time frame for addressing grievances and cannot automatically accept a writ petition.A. Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - Assessment - Challenge - Limitation - The petitioner opted to approach the High Court after t...
RATNAGIRI NAGAR PARISHAD vs. GANGARAM NARAYAN AMBEKAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 362 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 41(f) and (h) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000, the issue of land allocation for a waste disposal project arises. The plaintiff initiated a lawsuit to prevent the defendants from commencing the Solid Waste Disposa...
BIHAR STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION vs. ARUN KUMAR

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 364 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn the context of assessing candidates for recruitment to public services, the scope of judicial review is limited.A. Candidate Evaluation - Judicial Review - When it comes to the assessment of candidates, especially for public service recruitment, the scope of judicial review is restricted....
TRILOKI NATH SINGH vs. ANIRUDH SINGH

Judgement Date : 06 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 365 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe prohibition under Order 23, Rule 3A regarding the challenge of a decree based on a compromise between the parties also extends to individuals who are not part of the compromise proceedings. This rule aims to prevent multiple litigations.A. According to the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or...
SOUTH EAST ASIA MARINE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. vs. OIL INDIA LIMITED

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 366 SC

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996, Section 34, addresses the annulment of arbitral awards and the interpretation of arbitral agreements. In this case, a contract was formed between the parties as part of a tender issued by the respondent for drilling wells and related operations. After re...
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND MUSEUMS, JAIPUR vs. ASHISH GAUTAM

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 367 SC

Headnote :

The National Green Tribunal Act of 2010, Section 22, states that the Department of Archaeology has designated the monument \"Sisodia Rani ka Bagh\" as a protected site through a notification. This monument has historically hosted ceremonies such as weddings and other events. It features exquisite fo...
FOUNDATION FOR MEDIA PROFESSIONALS vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Judgement Date : 11 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 368 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEThe Court has ordered the formation of a Special Committee to assess the possibility of implementing faster internet services, specifically 3G and 4G, in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.According to the Temporary Suspension of Telecom Services (Public Emergency or Public Safety) Rules...
JAGMAIL SINGH vs. KARAMJIT SINGH

Judgement Date : 13 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 369 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTTo admit secondary evidence, foundational evidence must be provided explaining why the original evidence is unavailable.According to the Evidence Act of 1872, Sections 65 and 66, secondary evidence can only be permitted if primary evidence has been established. Secondary evidence serves as...
WORKMEN THROUGH THE CONVENER FCI LABOUR FEDERATION vs. RAVUTHAR DAWOOD NASEEM

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 370 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTContempt - No contempt proceedings can be initiated based solely on a general directive to regularize and departmentalize the relevant workers.According to Article 129 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, failure to comply with the d...
ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

KAVITA KANWAR vs. MRS. PAMELA MEHTA

Judgement Date : 19 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 372 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe absence of a written statement from the defendant does not automatically result in a judgment favoring the plaintiff without the necessity of proving fundamental facts.In probate matters, the proponent must satisfy the Court\'s conscience by eliminating any suspicious circumstances.A. Und...
CANARA BANK vs. M/S LEATHEROID PLASTICS PVT LTD.

Judgement Date : 20 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 374 SC

Headnote :

Indira Benerjee, J.A. Bihar Service Code, 1952, Rule 73 - Bihar Pension Rules 1950, Rule 57 - Retirement - Determination of maximum length of service - The Appellant was appointed at approximately 15 years of age. At the time of the Appellant\'s appointment, there was no minimum age requirement for...
PATEL ENGINEERING LTD. vs. NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD.

Judgement Date : 22 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 375 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAn arbitral award may be annulled under Section 34 if it is clearly illegal or irrational.According to the Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34 and 37, petitions for reviewing judgments are not entertained. An arbitral award can...
OMBIR SINGH vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 376 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALDelay in submitting FIR to magistrate - No basis for acquitting the accused.A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 157 - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 in conjunction with Section 34 - Murder - Delay in submitting FIR - The FIR was received by the Chief Judicial Magistrate\'s office...
ALAPATI JYOTSNA vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 377 SC

Headnote :

Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - Writ petition - Request for the respondents to implement \"single counselling\" for the allocation of seats in Post Graduate Medical Courses leading to Degrees and Diplomas, as well as seats in Diplomate of National Board Courses. Given that the petiti...
GURUNANAK INDUSTRIES, FARIDABAD vs. AMAR SINGH (D)

Judgement Date : 26 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 378 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTDistinction between `retirement of a partner\' and `dissolution of a partnership firm\' - When there are only two partners and one decides to retire, this effectively results in the dissolution of the firm.A. According to the Partnership Act of 1932, Sections 37 and 48 - There is a clear di...
GOPAL PRASAD vs. BIHAR SCHOOL EXAMINATION BOARD

Judgement Date : 28 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 380 SC

Headnote :

Indira Benerjee, J.A. Bihar Service Code, 1952, Rule 73 - Bihar Pension Rules 1950, Rule 57 - Retirement - Determination of maximum length of service - The Appellant was appointed at approximately 15 years of age. At the time of the Appellant\'s appointment, there was no minimum age requirement for...
SONU @ SUNIL vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Judgement Date : 29 May 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 381 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe essence of Section 34 of the IPC and the foundational principle of criminal liability for the actions of another is the shared or common intention to commit an offense.A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 394, 460, and 302 in conjunction with Section 34 of the Evidence Act, 1872...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter