Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs. SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH

Judgement Date : 16 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 566 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe opportunity for a hearing - Natural justice serves as a flexible instrument for the judiciary to address injustices in appropriate cases.CRUCIALA violation of natural justice alone does not render orders invalid - There must be a demonstration of prejudice to the litigant.A. Constitution...
NAVIN CHANDRA DHOUNDIYAL vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Judgement Date : 16 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 567 SC

Headnote :

Kumaun University Statute, Statute 16.24(2) - Superannuation of teachers - Reappointment - The High Court, in its contested ruling, dismissed the appellants\' petition, stating that Statute No. 16.24 (2) explicitly prohibits the extension of service beyond the age of superannuation. The interpretati...
UMESH KUMAR SHARMA vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Judgement Date : 16 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 568 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALTransfer of criminal cases - A request for transfer may only be considered when fair justice is at risk, and the court must be fully convinced that an impartial trial cannot occur.A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 406 - Transfer of criminal cases - The petitioner requested the transfe...
SATISH CHANDER AHUJA vs. SNEHA AHUJA

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 561 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALDomestic Violence Act - Shared Household - Definition - A shared household does not refer to the household of a joint family of which the husband is a member or in which the husband of the aggrieved person has a share.CRUCIALThe residence of a woman in a household must indicate a degree of pe...
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs. BHERULAL

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 562 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTLimitation - The Supreme Court of India is not a venue for Governments to approach at their convenience while disregarding the established limitation period.According to Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950 - Special Leave Petition - A delay of 663 days in filing the SLP was noted...
SARAVANAN vs. STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 563 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEDefault Bail - Conditions Imposed - It is not permissible to impose any conditions regarding the deposit of an alleged amount when granting default bail.According to Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the criteria for default bail is that the accused must have been in custody fo...
STATE OF U.P. vs. GAYATRI PRASAD PRAJAPATI

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 564 SC

Headnote :

The Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, Section 437, along with Sections 376D, 504, 506, and 511 of the Indian Penal Code of 1860, and Sections 3 and 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act of 2012, pertains to interim bail. The High Court had granted interim bail to the applicant-resp...
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. vs. PIYUSH KANT SHARMA

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 565 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 16 - Regularization in service - The respondent was engaged as a Computer Operator on a contractual basis and requested to be granted a regular pay scale and to have his services regularized, claiming he had been working for the past three years. However, the...
HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATION OF MUDUMALAI vs. DEFENCE OF ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMALS

Judgement Date : 14 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 559 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALElephant Corridor - Legal action is necessary as wildlife corridors face threats from various social, economic, and human-induced factors - The State Government\'s acceptance of the High Court\'s recommendations to appoint an Expert Committee is without fault.A. Under Section 3 of the Tamil N...
GANESAN vs. STATE REP. BY ITS INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Judgement Date : 14 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 560 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALUnder the POCSO Act, a conviction can be secured based solely on the victim\'s testimony if it is deemed credible and trustworthy.According to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 7 in conjunction with Section 8 regarding sexual assault - the appellant-accused ha...
SRI MUNIRAJU GOWDA P. M. vs. SRI MUNIRATHNA

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 553 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALElection Petition - If neither the original nor the amended election petition includes any allegations of material facts that would allow the Court to determine, under Section 101, that the petitioner is duly elected, the High Court has no choice but to dismiss such a request.A. Representatio...
CHOWGULE AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED vs. GOA FOUNDATION

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 554 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 9 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Rule 12(1)(gg) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016, the maintainability of the intervening application is in question. The applicants in the M.A. did not...
ANIL BHARDWAJ vs. HONBLE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 555 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEAppointment as District Judge - The appellant has been deemed ineligible due to an ongoing criminal case against him under Sections 498A and 406 of the IPC, based on a complaint from his wife. Being included in the select list does not guarantee an unassailable right to the candidate.According...
SUGANDHI (DEAD) vs. P. RAJKUMAR

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 556 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Civil Procedure Code of 1908, Order 8, Rule 1A (3), regarding the production of documents, the defendant requested permission from the court to submit a document that should have been included with the written statement. The court has the discretion to grant such permission, but it must...
HANUMAPPA (SINCE DECEASED) BY HIS LRS vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 557 SC

Headnote :

The Karnataka Land Reform Act of 1961, Section 61, and Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950, address the issue of status quo and its vacation. The petitioner asserted that he was a tenant cultivating the property on the designated date, which was subsequently sold to the respondent by the...
RAGHUNATH vs. RADHA MOHAN (D) THR. LRS.

Judgement Date : 13 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 558 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALPre-emption right - The right of pre-emption is a limited right that can be overridden by any legitimate means, including the assertion of a superior or equal right.CRUCIALThe right of pre-emption is not a recurring right - Once an individual has relinquished their right, the loss of that rig...
FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. vs. P.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS.

Judgement Date : 12 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 550 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALA mere delay, on its own, cannot be the only reason to deny specific performance.A. Under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 - In a suit for specific performance, the agreement to sell includes a specific clause requiring the vendor to secure permission from the appropriate authority...
ANAND YADAV vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 12 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 551 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAppointment - Expert Opinions - Educational matters should be entrusted to education professionals, while still adhering to applicable laws and regulations.A. University Grants Commission Act, 1956, Section 22 - Appointment as Assistant Professor - Master\'s degrees are considered equivalent...
AMAR SINGH vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgement Date : 12 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 552 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, concerning murder, the reliability of eyewitness testimony is in question. The deceased was allegedly killed by the accused appellants, and the prosecution presented three eyewitnesses, two of whom were the deceased\'s brothers. However, both the...
ASHISH SETH vs. SUMIT MITTAL

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 545 SC

Headnote :

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(c) addresses noncompliance with court orders. In this case, both the petitioner and the contemnor entered into a Memorandum of Settlement (MOS), which was incorporated into the court\'s order that resolved the Writ Petition (Criminal). The contemnor failed...
BRANCH MANAGER vs. BRANCH MANAGER

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 546 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALMedical Policy - The applicant did not disclose a history of vomiting blood that occurred just a month before the insurance policy was issued and subsequent hospitalization. The insured was suffering from a pre-existing condition.A. National Insurance Act, 1938, Section 45 - Consumer Protecti...
NILAY GUPTA vs. CHAIRMAN NEET PG MEDICAL AND DENTAL ADMISSION/COUNSELLING BOARD 2020 AND PRINCIPAL GOVT. DENTAL COLLEGE

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 547 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTPrivate medical colleges are not obligated to set aside a specific quota for NRI candidates; therefore, no student has the right to claim admission under the NRI quota.According to the Medical Council of India Act, 1956, Section 10D, and the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences Act, 2005...
KARULAL vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOME DEPARTMENT STATION OFFICER

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 548 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe testimony of a related witness, if deemed credible, can serve as a foundation for conviction - Being related to the deceased does not automatically imply that they will wrongfully accuse innocent individuals.IMPORTANTWitness - If witnesses are generally reliable, previous animosity alon...
ANKITA KAILASH KHANDELWAL vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 543 SC

Headnote :

NOTICERagging - The accused allegedly encouraged the deceased to take her own life - The accused are female doctors - They are permitted to continue their studies as long as it does not interfere with the prosecution.Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 174 - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 306...
MISS 'A' vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 544 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTProvision of documents to the accused - Under no circumstances should copies of statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code be provided until the Court issues appropriate orders after taking cognizance of the matter.Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 164, 207, and 208 - Provision...
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE vs. UMESH KUMAR

Judgement Date : 07 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 540 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAppointment - The mere presence of a candidate\'s name on the selection list does not grant that candidate any inherent right to receive an appointment order.According to the Delhi Police (Appointment and Recruitment) Rules, 1980, specifically Rules 24 and 25 - Regarding appointment directive...
AMIT SAHNI vs. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Judgement Date : 07 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 541 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEProtests - Demonstrations aimed at expressing dissent must occur only in designated areas. Blocking public pathways, whether at the specific site of the protest or elsewhere, is not permitted.According to Article 19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India, 1950 - The Saheenbagh demonstration involv...
SATYA DEO @ BHOOREY vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 07 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 542 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTThe appellant was not considered a juvenile under the 1986 Act at the time the offense was committed. However, they cannot be denied the benefits of being treated as a juvenile following the enactment of the 2000 Act, even if the offense occurred before the 2000 Act came into effect.A. Acco...
T.K. DAVID vs. KURUPPAMPADY SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

Judgement Date : 05 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 539 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136, along with the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 7, pertains to the rejection of a review petition. In this case, a Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed against the main order of a writ petition, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court. Subse...
GURCHARAN SINGH vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 533 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALMens Rea - It is essential to have documented evidence indicating that the accused possessed a guilty mind; the element of mens rea cannot be presumed to be evidently present.A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 107, 306, 304B, and 498A regarding Suicide - Instigation - The accused...
PRAVASI LEGAL CELL vs. UNION OF INDIA

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 534 SC

Headnote :

NOTICEFor air tickets purchased during the lockdown period, please adhere to DGCA recommendations regarding refunds, which will be directed to travel agents for tickets booked through them.According to Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, refunds...
GUJARAT MAZDOOR SABHA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 535 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALPublic Emergency - Emergency powers may only be invoked if the level of economic hardship is so severe that it disrupts public order and poses a threat to the security of India or any part of its territory.A. Factories Act, 1948, Section 5 - Authority to issue exemption notifications - Emerge...
M/S ARUN KUMAR KAMAL KUMAR vs. M/S SELECTED MARBLE HOME

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 536 SC

Headnote :

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1940, Section 20 - The appellants, who operate restaurants and manufacture and sell sweets and other food products, entered into two licensing agreements with the respondents. According to these agreements, the appellants were to manage and run a restaurant an...
PARVEZ NOORDIN LOKHANDWALLA vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 537 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAn Indian citizen with an Indian passport who has an FIR filed against him should not be automatically barred from traveling to the US, where he has been a resident since 1985. This is especially pertinent given that not allowing him to travel could lead to severe repercussions, such as the i...
M/S MAGMA FINCORP LTD. vs. RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI

Judgement Date : 01 Oct 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 538 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTHire Purchase - When the agreement between the Financier and the hirer allows the Financier to reclaim the vehicle financed, there are no legal barriers preventing the Financier from taking possession of the vehicle. Therefore, if the Financier takes possession of the vehicle, it cannot be...
NEETU YADAV vs. SACHIN YADAV

Judgement Date : 30 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 529 SC

Headnote :

The Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, Section 13, and the Civil Procedure Code of 1908, Section 25, pertain to the transfer of a divorce petition. In this case, the wife has requested the transfer of the divorce petition filed by her husband from the Principal Judge of the Family Court in South West, Dwar...
SATISH @ SABBE vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Judgement Date : 30 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 530 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALPremature release - Duration of sentence or severity of initial crime - Cannot be the only reason for denying premature release.A. UP Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938, Section 2 - First-time offenders - Premature release - Society has the right to live peacefully and without fear, fre...
SUBED ALI vs. STATE OF ASSAM

Judgement Date : 30 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 531 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALCommon intention - This is a matter of inference derived from the facts and circumstances of the case, based on a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence against the participants.A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 and 34 - Murder conviction - Viability - The two victims were attacked w...
KAUSHIK CHATERJEE vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Judgement Date : 30 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 532 SC

Headnote :

NOTICETransfer - Criminal cases cannot be transferred on the basis of lack of territorial jurisdiction prior to the presentation of evidence.A. Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 406 - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 406, 408, 420, 120B - Criminal proceedings - Request for transfer of three cr...
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs. AMIT SHRIVAS

Judgement Date : 29 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 528 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALCompassionate appointment - There is no automatic entitlement to compassionate appointment; it is granted based on specific criteria, particularly to assist families in need.A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14 - Madhya Pradesh (Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules...
MAHESHWAR TIGGA vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 527 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALRape - The misunderstanding regarding a promise to marry must occur close in time to the event and cannot extend over a lengthy duration.A. Under the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 376, 323, and 341, the sustainability of a rape conviction is questioned when the prosecutrix claims the appe...
Dr. JITENDRA GUPTA vs. Dr. C. CHANDRAMOULI IAS

Judgement Date : 25 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 525 SC

Headnote :

A. IAS (Cadre) Rules, 1954, Rules 5(2) and 6 - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 2(b) Cadre Transfer - Contempt - The appellant, an IAS officer, sought a directive for his transfer from the Bihar Cadre to the Haryana Cadre. The Central Administrative Tribunal, after nullifying the Central Governm...
ANWAR ALI vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Judgement Date : 25 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 526 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALMotive - While the lack of motive cannot be a basis for dismissing the prosecution\'s case, the absence of motive in a case reliant on circumstantial evidence is a consideration that favors the accused.A. Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302 in conjunction with Section 34 - Murder - Viabilit...
UNION OF INDIA vs. M/S G.S. CHATHA RICE MILLS

Judgement Date : 23 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 523 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALThe improvement in the process of uploading Custom Duty notifications in the e-Gazette is of great importance.CRUCIALCustom Duty Enhancement - An increase in the duty rate, as authorized by Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act, can only take effect prospectively.A. Under the Customs Tariff Ac...
BELI RAM vs. RAJINDER KUMAR

Judgement Date : 23 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 524 SC

Headnote :

Under the Workmen\'s Compensation Act of 1923, specifically Sections 3 and 4, the owner of a vehicle is liable for compensation. An employer must initially verify the driver\'s license, but they cannot simply disregard their responsibility to ensure that the driver has renewed their license. In this...
STATE OF KERALA vs. M/S RDS PROJECT LIMITED

Judgement Date : 22 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 521 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 14 - Report from an expert body: A flyover built by the Respondent was in use for a year when the Consultancy Agency for the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, conducted a routine inspection and found the bridge to be in a distresse...
NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR PEOPLES MOVEMENTS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : 22 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 522 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTClassification of undertrial and convicted prisoners for temporary release by the Maharashtra High Powered Committee in light of the Covid-19 situation.In the context of the Covid-19 situation, the classification of undertrial and convicted prisoners for temporary release by the High Powere...
RAKESH KUMAR AGARWALLA vs. NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY, BENGALURU

Judgement Date : 21 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 520 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALAdmission to the Law Course - The separate admission notice issued by the National Law School of India University, in the event of a delay in CLAT 2020, is not valid.A. Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32 - National Law School of India Act, 1986, Section 13 - Admission to the National Law...
SAGUFA AHMED vs. UPPER ASSAM PLYWOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD

Judgement Date : 18 Sep 2020

Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 518 SC

Headnote :

NOTICESupreme Court ruling on the extension of limitation period - The order does not extend the timeframe for which delays can be excused under statutory discretion.Companies Act, 2013, Section 421(3) - General Clauses Act, 1897 Section 10 - Applications for condonation of delay and appeals deemed...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter