Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Delhi Motor Company & Ors Vs. U.A. Basrurkar & Ors [1968] INSC 1 (8 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 1 SC

Headnote :

Documents were executed between the appellant firm and the respondent company regarding premises where the latter was a tenant. The appellant claimed these documents were meant to establish a sublease for three sections of the premises, although they seemingly aimed to create a partnership to circum...
O. N. Mohindroo Vs. The Bar Council of Delhi & Ors [1968] INSC 2 (8 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 2 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted a writ petition to the High Court seeking to annul: (a) the suspension order issued against him by the State Bar Council under section 4.35 of the Advocates Act, 1961, (b) the Bar Council of India\'s order in appeal under section 37 of the Act, which upheld the suspension, an...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay Vs. M/S. Shree Goverdhan Ltd., Bombay [1968] INSC 3 (9 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 09 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 3 SC

Headnote :

According to the Indian Income-tax Act of 1922, specifically sections 2(11) and 23A, a company\'s accounting year concludes on September 30 each year. In this case, the company is a partner in a firm whose accounting periods for the assessment year 1951-52 end on November 30, 1950, and March 31, 195...
T. S. Pl. P. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. T. K. B. Santhanaramaswami Odayar & Ors [1968] INSC 4 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 4 SC

Headnote :

When the Raja of Tanjore passed away in 1855 without any male heirs, the East India Company seized all of his properties, including his personal assets. However, following a memorial submitted by the senior widow of the deceased Raja, the Government of India approved the transfer of all the landed p...
Anglo American Direct Tea Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-Tax, Kerala State [1968] INSC 5 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 5 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were engaged in the cultivation, production, and sale of tea, with some owning tea plantations both within and outside Kerala.The income generated from the sale of tea that was cultivated and produced by the sellers is considered to be derived partly from business activities and partl...
Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Limited Vs. The Government of Madras [1968] INSC 6 (10 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 10 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 6 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner, a public limited company engaged in the production of various steel and iron products, sought an exemption from tax from the respondent Madras Government under section 12 of the Madras Electricity Act No. IV of 1962. This section stipulates that if a specified type of energy is consu...
Ramji Dixit & ANR Vs. Bhrigunath & Ors [1968] INSC 7 (12 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Headnote :

Following the death of her husband, a Hindu widow inherited certain agricultural lands. She became a bhumidhar upon the implementation of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act of 1951. Subsequently, she transferred the lands to respondents 1 and 2 as a gift. After her passing, the appell...
Hira Singh Pal Vs. Madan Lal [1968] INSC 8 (15 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 15 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 8 SC

Headnote :

The respondent submitted two nomination papers to contest the 1967 general election for the Legislative Assembly from a constituency in Himachal Pradesh. Both papers were rejected during the scrutiny process. The first nomination was dismissed because the name of the proposer was incorrectly listed...
Ningawwa Vs. Byrappa & Ors [1968] INSC 9 (17 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 9 SC

Headnote :

In 1938, the appellant signed a gift deed transferring four plots of land—two located in village T and two in village L—to her husband. At that time, the appellant was young and illiterate, and her husband was able to exert control over her decisions. She believed that the document pertained onl...
Minor P. Rajendran Vs. State of Madras & Ors [1968] INSC 10 (17 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 17 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 10 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners contested a decision made by the State Government regarding the rules established for selecting candidates for admission to a medical program. These rules included seat reservations for different categories of candidates, such as Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes, \'socially and edu...
Laxman Siddappa Naik Vs. Kattimani Chaniappa Jamappanna & Ors [1968] INSC 11 (19 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 19 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 11 SC

Headnote :

A candidate who was unsuccessful in the election for a seat in the Mysore Legislative Assembly, designated for a member of the Scheduled Tribes, filed an election petition arguing that the other three candidates were from the Bedar caste, which is not recognized as a tribe in Part VIII, paragraph 2...
Pashupati Nath Singh Vs. Harihar Prasad Singh [1968] INSC 12 (22 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 12 SC

Headnote :

The appellant contested the election of the respondent to the Bihar Legislative Assembly through an election petition, arguing that his nomination paper had been wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer. On January 21, 1967, the scheduled date for the scrutiny of nomination papers as per section 36...
R. Ramakrishna Rao Vs. State of Kerala [1968] INSC 13 (23 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 13 SC

Headnote :

The appellant began operating a hotel in 1948. In 1949, he opened a second hotel, followed by a third in 1959 at the same location. With the addition of the third hotel, the total number of employees reached 20.The issue at hand is whether the proprietor can claim an exemption under S. 16(1)(b) of t...
Hazari & Ors Vs. Neki & Ors [1968] INSC 14 (25 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 25 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

According to section 4 of the Amending Act (Punjab Act 10 of 1960), section 15 of the Punjab Pre-emption Act of 1913 was repealed and replaced with a new provision that did not grant a right of pre-emption to individuals who owned land in the estate, as the original section 15(c) \'thirdly\' had pro...
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors Vs. Sardar D.K. Jadav [1968] INSC 15 (25 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 25 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

Refer to section 4 of the Act.According to section 5(c) of the Act, all tanks, private wells, and similar structures located on \'occupied land\' as defined in section 2(i)(ix) of the Act are exempt from vesting. The Madhya Pradesh Revenue Code of 1959 (Act 20 of 1959) in section 251 states that all...
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Maharaj Narain & Ors [1968] INSC 16 (30 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 30 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

The appellant State submitted an appeal to the High Court on March 29, 1963, challenging the trial court\'s order from November 10, 1962, which had acquitted the respondents. The details in the order copy included with the Memorandum of Appeal indicated that the appeal was timely filed. It showed th...
Kt. N. Rm. Thenappa Chettiar & Ors Vs. N. S. Kr. Karuppan Chettiar & Ors [1968] INSC 17 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellants initiated a lawsuit seeking the establishment of a scheme regarding a trust and an accounting of its management by C, along with certain related reliefs. They contended that the trust was a joint establishment created on November 12, 1919, by the ancestors of several parties involved...
Special Land Acquisition & Rehabilitation Officer, Sagar Vs. M. S. Seshagiri Rao & ANR [1968] INSC 18 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The Government of Mysore allocated a parcel of land to the respondents with the stipulation that \"if the Government needs the land for any reason, the grantee must return the land to the Government without seeking any compensation.\" The Government proceeded to acquire the land following the proced...
Union of India Vs. Nanak Singh [1968] INSC 19 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

Headnote :

The respondent served as a temporary Field Inspector at the Office of the Custodian of Evacuee Property in Delhi. In January 1958, the Additional Settlement Commissioner, Mr. Kane, who also held the position of Additional Custodian, terminated the respondent\'s employment, providing one month\'s sal...
Chhatu Ram Horil Ram Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar & ANR [1968] INSC 20 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company secured a lease for certain mica-bearing land from the owners for a duration of fifteen years.The lease agreement included a provision for renewal at the lessee\'s discretion upon the expiration of the lease term. However, the land was part of an estate that, due to a notificat...
Birendra Pratap Singh & ANR Vs. Gulwant Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 21 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

P held an ex-proprietary tenancy over certain lands and, on June 5, 1947, executed a sub-lease in favor of the appellants, which stipulated that the tenancy would commence on July 1, 1947, and was registered on June 22. On January 15, 1951, P surrendered his tenancy rights to the landlord, who subse...
Firm Mukand Lal Veer Kumar & ANR Vs. Sri Purushottam Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 22 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

M, a partner in a firm, executed a deed of gift for a property that was not part of the partnership in October 1957. This deed was registered in March 1958. Subsequently, in April, May 1958, and January 1959, petitions were filed claiming that the firm and its two partners had engaged in acts of ins...
Gram Sabha, Besahani Vs. Ram Raj Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 23 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

The respondents initiated a lawsuit under section 209 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act of 1950 concerning five plots of land, asserting Sirdari rights in one plot and Bhumidari rights in the other four. They contested the order issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which was clai...
Thakore Sobhag Singh Vs. Thakur Jai Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 24 (31 January 1968)

Judgement Date : 31 Jan 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The Board of Revenue in Rajasthan rejected the respondent\'s claim to be recognized as the adopted son of the last holder of the jagir without making a determination on the fact of adoption. They based their decision on the grounds that, according to the Matmi Rules, an adoption made without prior a...
Sahodrabairai Vs. Ram Singh Aharwar [1968] INSC 25 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted an election petition that included a pamphlet as an annexure. The petition contained an English translation of the pamphlet, which was stated to be part of the petition. The first respondent objected, claiming that a copy of the pamphlet was not attached to the version of the...
Management, Chitavalsah Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Chitavalsah Jute Mills [1968] INSC 26 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

The appellant in this case was a jute mill. The Industrial Tribunal established a gratuity scheme for its employees, which the appellant subsequently contested in this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution.Two main arguments were presented: (i) the wage board did not have the authority to reco...
State of Punjab Vs. Dharam Singh [1968] INSC 27 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Headnote :

The teachers who were employed in District Board Schools were transferred to the State of Punjab starting from 1st October 1957, coinciding with the provincialization of Local Bodies Schools in the State. The Punjab Educational Service (Provincialised Cadre) Class III Rules were established in 1961...
Madan Lal Ram Chandra Daga Vs. State of Maharashtra [1968] INSC 28 (5 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 05 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Headnote :

The three appellants, who were a partner, a munim, and a clerk of the R. R. firm, were closely related. During their transactions with the J. R. firm, which acted as bankers and commission agents, the appellants allegedly inflated the invoices for goods, created exaggerated hundies, and borrowed mon...
South Bihar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors [1968] INSC 29 (5 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 05 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

The appellant companies produced sugar using a carbonation process and paid excise duty on the sugar they manufactured, as specified in item 1 of Schedule 1 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. An affidavit submitted by the respondents indicated that these manufacturers utilized a method involv...
Om Prabha Jain Vs. Abnash Chand & ANR [1968] INSC 30 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

The State of Haryana was established on November 1, 1966. The Cabinet allocated certain funds for the ministers to use at their discretion for public utility purposes, aimed at benefiting the general public and uplifting backward communities. These funds were required to be distributed by March 31,...
Ghasi Ram Vs. Dal Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 31 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Headnote :

The first respondent was elected to the Haryana State Legislative Assembly during the elections held on February 19, 1967. The appellant contested his election through an election petition, claiming, among other things, that before the election, the respondent, who was a Minister in the State Govern...
P. D. Sharma Vs. State Bank of India [1968] INSC 32 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 32 SC

Headnote :

While an industrial dispute was ongoing before the Tribunal between the employer and its employees, the employer decided to terminate the appellant, who was a \'protected workman\'. Consequently, the employer sought permission from the Tribunal under section 33(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act to d...
Udai Ram Sharma & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1968] INSC 33 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

Headnote :

In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. V. P. Sharma, [1966] 3 S.C.R. 557, the Court determined that once a declaration was made under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, the notification issued under section 4(1) was considered exhausted, and no further notifications under section 6 co...
Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Kalyan Borough Municipality & ANR [1968] INSC 34 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 34 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, which assumed control of electrical energy supply from the original licensee, raised the tariff and established a uniform rate for all its consumers. The respondent consumers submitted petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, arguing th...
Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1968] INSC 35 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 35 SC

Headnote :

The Industrial Tribunal, in its ruling regarding a company and its employees, determined that the company was not acting in good faith and that it should have utilized the proper procedures before laying off twelve of its workers. Upon appeal to this Court,HELD: (i) Once the Tribunal establishes tha...
Puttarangamma & Ors Vs. M. S. Ranganna & 3 Ors [1968] INSC 36 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 36 SC

Headnote :

The head of a joint Hindu family fell ill and, having no male heirs, took steps to protect the interests of his daughters, the appellant and the fourth respondent. He sent registered notices to the other family members, clearly stating his intention to separate from them. Subsequently, he chose to r...
Moti Lal Banker Vs. Mahraj Kumar Mahmood Hasan Khan [1968] INSC 37 (9 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Headnote :

A lawsuit initiated by the appellant resulted in a settlement, which was formalized in a decree on March 24, 1953. This decree mandated the respondent to pay Rs. 22,500 plus 6% interest within six months. When the respondent failed to make the payment, the appellant initiated execution proceedings o...
Lachhman Dass & Ors Vs. Municipal Committee, Jalalabad & Ors [1968] INSC 38 (12 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 38 SC

Headnote :

In 1949, a specific property was classified as evacuee property, prompting the District Rent and Managing Officer in Jalalabad to begin collecting rent for it. The Municipal Committee, claiming ownership of the property, initiated a lawsuit for a declaration of its rights. The trial court referred t...
Nair Service Society Ltd. Vs. Rev. Father K. C. Alexander & Ors [1968] INSC 39 (12 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 39 SC

Headnote :

Following a case under the Travancore Land Conservancy Regulation IV of 1094 M.E., the plaintiff was removed from 160 acres of Poramboke land. In August 1938, the appellant Society applied for a Kuthakapattom lease for this area, which was approved, and the Society took possession in July 1939. The...
Dalpat Singh & ANR Vs. State of Rajasthan [1968] INSC 40 (13 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 13 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 40 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a Havaldar, and the second appellant, a Subedar in the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary, were accused of extorting money from an individual by alleging that he was involved in black marketing and frequently traveling to Pakistan. They threatened that if he did not pay the demanded sum, he...
A.Vishwanath Rao Vs. The State of Mysore & Ors [1968] INSC 41 (16 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 16 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 41 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were transport operators operating a \'stage carriage\' on an inter-State route that spans 28 miles, with 5 miles located in Andhra Pradesh and the remainder in Mysore. The Mysore State Road Transport Corporation, the second respondent, prepared and published a draft scheme under sect...
Ambalal Purshottam Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation & Ors [1968] INSC 42 (19 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 42 SC

Headnote :

To widen a street, the municipality requested the State Government to acquire the lands within the \"line of the street\" as defined by the Municipality. Following this, the State Government issued a notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The landowners, with the Municipality\'s p...
Mulamchand Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1968] INSC 43 (20 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 20 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 43 SC

Headnote :

Prior to the enforcement of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (Act 1 of 1951) on April 1, 1951, the appellant had acquired the right to collect forest produce from certain landowners for the years 1951, 1952, and 1953. This right was to b...
Amolak Chand Vs. Raghuveer Singh [1968] INSC 44 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and the respondent were competing candidates in the 1967 general election for the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. In addition to them, two other candidates had submitted their nomination papers, but these were rejected because both had been proposed by the same elector. The appell...
State of Punjab & ANR Vs. Shri Sukh Raj Bahadur [1968] INSC 45 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 45 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, who held a permanent position in the Delhi Administration, was appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) and was placed on an 18-month probationary period, which could be extended, contingent upon his completion of training. He successfully passed all departmental exam...
Tarak Nath Ghosh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1968] INSC 46 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 46 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was appointed to the Secretary of State\'s Service, known as the Indian Police, in 1937. On June 29, 1965, while serving as a Deputy Inspector-General of Police in Bihar, the State Government issued an order suspending him pending an inquiry. This order was later partially modified by...
Western U.P. Electric Power And Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1968] INSC 47 (23 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 47 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner company, which holds a license, was providing electrical energy to the third respondent. The Electricity Board was established under the Electric Supply Act of 1948, and the Indian Electricity (U.P.) Amendment Act of 1961 removed the Board\'s restriction on supplying electrical energy...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Birla Cotton, Spinning And Weaving Mills, Delhi& ANR [1968] INSC 48 (23 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 48 SC

Headnote :

On February 9, 1959, the appellant Corporation adopted a resolution in accordance with section 150(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 66 of 1957 to impose certain taxes, including a tax on the consumption or sale of electricity.According to section 150(2), the Central Government approved the...
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. P. K. Mukherji & ANR [1968] INSC 49 (26 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 49 SC

Headnote :

A joint stock company had a provident fund scheme managed by a board of trustees. The first respondent, a chartered accountant, was appointed by the company\'s board of directors to audit the Provident Fund\'s accounts for the years 1953 and 1954. In 1954, the trustees advanced over six lakhs rupees...
Arbind Kumar Singh Vs. Nand Kishore Prasad & Ors [1968] INSC 50 (26 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 50 SC

Headnote :

In the years 1950-51, the appellant operated his motor buses in Bihar. Bihar Act 17 of 1950 introduced a tax on passengers and goods transported by public service motor vehicles. Since the tax was deemed invalid, the appellant did not pay it. In 1961, the tax was reinstated by Act 17 of 1961, effect...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter