Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Prem Prakash Vs. Union of India & Ors [1984] INSC 151 (22 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 22 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 151 SC

Headnote :

Rule 18 of the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, 1970 (hereafter referred to as the Rules) stipulates that the Selection Committee must compile a merit list of candidates and submit it to the Administrator for the purpose of filling existing vacancies or any vacancies that may arise within one year of t...
Central Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. Bhubaneswar Singh & Ors [1984] INSC 152 (23 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 23 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 152 SC

Headnote :

The Central Government took control of the coal mine owned by Respondent No.1, a partnership firm, starting October 17, 1971, under the Coking Coal Mines (Emergency Provisions) Ordinance of 1971, which was subsequently replaced by legislation. With the enactment of the Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisa...
Commissioner of Income-Tax Calcutta Vs. Dalhousie Properties Ltd. [1984] INSC 153 (23 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 23 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Headnote :

In assessing the annual value of the property subject to income tax for the assessment year 1966-67 under the category \"Income from house property\" as per section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the respondent-assessee argued that the total municipal tax liability imposed by the corporation, regar...
Satyendra Narain Singh & Ors Vs. Ram Natih Singh & Ors [1984] INSC 154 (23 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 23 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 154 SC

Headnote :

The appellants and respondents are part of an organization known as the State Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Bihar. Respondent No. 1 initiated a lawsuit in the Court of the learned Munsif, 3rd Court, Patna, as a life member of the Society, and secured an injunction preventing th...
V. Sasidharan Vs. Peter & Karunakar & Ors [1984] INSC 155 (23 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 23 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 155 SC

Headnote :

The appellant filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority under the Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 (hereafter referred to as the Act) challenging his dismissal from employment by respondent No. 1, a law firm. Respondent No. 1 contended that the appeal was not valid because the...
Nasirul Haque Vs. Jitendra Nath Dey [1984] INSC 156 (24 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 24 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 156 SC

Headnote :

In a second appeal submitted by the appellant-tenant regarding an eviction order, the High Court sent the case back to the trial court, requesting a determination on the issue of partial eviction. The trial court, in its findings, believed that the matter of partial eviction should be evaluated base...
Bhagirath Kanoria & Ors Vs. State of M.P. & Ors [1984] INSC 157 (24 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 24 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 157 SC

Headnote :

The Provident Fund Inspector lodged complaints against the appellant Directors, the Factory Manager, and the respondent No.2-Company, accusing them of failing to pay the employer\'s contribution under the Employees\' Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund Act of 1952. It was alleged that the accused...
Mohammad Idris & ANR Vs. Rustam Jahangir Babuji & Ors [1984] INSC 158 (27 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 27 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 158 SC

Headnote :

The two petitioners in the Special Leave Petition were sentenced to one month in civil jail by a Single Judge of the High Court under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, due to their violation of an undertaking made in an ongoing suit in the High Court. Their appeal to a Division Bench under Section 19...
Sital Prasad Saxena (Dead) By Lrs. Vs. Union of India & Ors [1984] INSC 159 (28 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 159 SC

Headnote :

Mahendra Kumar Saxena filed three applications in the High Court: one under Order XXII Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) for the substitution of the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased appellant; another under Order XXII Rule 9, C.P.C. to set aside the abatement of the appeal,...
Sambangi Applaswamy Naidu & Ors Vs. Behara Venkataramanayya Patro & Ors [1984] INSC 160 (28 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 160 SC

Headnote :

The respondents, predecessor Behara Venkataramanayya Patro, executed two deeds on 30-8-1939 and 25-8-1942 in favor of Sambangi Thavitinaidue, who was then a tenant of the property. In 1951, the mortgagor initiated a suit for redemption of the mortgages and received a preliminary decree on 31-12-1952...
Workmen Employed By Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited [1984] INSC 161 (28 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 161 SC

Headnote :

Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (referred to as the Act) defines an \'industrial dispute\' as any disagreement or conflict between employers and employers, employers and employees, or among employees themselves, that is related to employment, non-employment, employment terms, or la...
Joginder Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & ANR [1984] INSC 162 (29 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 29 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 162 SC

Headnote :

The appellants received a specific amount of compensation from the Land Acquisition Officer, which was subsequently increased by both the District Judge and the High Court. When it was noted that sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act had been modified by Haryana Act No. 8 of 1967, raising t...
Jeewanlal (1929) Ltd.Etc. Vs. The Authority Under The Payment of Gratuity Act & [1984] INSC 163 (29 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 29 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 163 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, a monthly-rated employee of the appellant, a public limited company, ended his employment upon reaching the age of superannuation after 35 years of service. He was entitled to gratuity payment under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The appellant calculated the gratuity amount under...
Jiwani Devi Paraki Vs. First Land Acquisition Collector, Calcutta & Ors [1984] INSC 164 (30 August 1984)

Judgement Date : 30 Aug 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner is the tenant of the property located at 7/1A-D, Lindsay Street, Calcutta, which is in a significant commercial area of the city. The ground floor and mezzanine of this property were requisitioned by the government to establish the main sales showroom for the West Bengal Handicrafts a...
Harihar Polyfibres Vs. The Regional Director, ESI Corporation [1984] INSC 165 (4 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 04 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 165 SC

Headnote :

The issue at hand was whether the term \'wages\' as defined in section 2 (22) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 encompasses \'House Rent Allowance\', \'Night Shift Allowance\', \'Heat, Gas and Dust Allowance\', and \'Incentive Allowance\' that an employer provides to their employees.
Union of India Vs. State of Rajasthan [1984] INSC 166 (4 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 04 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 166 SC

Headnote :

The State of Rajasthan, represented by its District Rehabilitation Officer in Barmer, initiated a lawsuit in the District Court of Balotra against the Union of India and the Railway Administration, seeking compensation for damages incurred due to harm to goods transported by rail. The appellant argu...
Sheoratan Agarwal & ANR Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1984] INSC 167 (12 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 12 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 167 SC

Headnote :

HEADNOTE:The two appellants, who served as the Managing Director and Production Manager of a public limited company, faced prosecution by the respondent for alleged breaches of clauses 2 (c) (i) and 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Pulses, Edible Oil Seeds and Edible Oil Dealers Licensing Order, 1977, as wel...
Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh, Nagpur Vs. The Model Mills, Nagpur & ANR [1984] INSC 170 (18 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 18 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 170 SC

Headnote :

The appellant-Union issued a notice demanding the payment of bonuses for the years 1964-65 to 1967-68. This issue was brought to conciliation, where the Conciliation Officer determined that a resolution could not be reached and issued a certificate under Section 73A of the Bombay Industrial Relation...
Mathew Areeparmtil & Ors Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1984] INSC 171 (20 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 20 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 171 SC

Headnote :

Sections 144 and 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.The petitioners highlighted to the Court that a significant number of individuals have been detained in prisons without trial for minor offenses.
State of Punjab Vs. Hindsons (P) Ltd. [1984] INSC 172 (20 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 20 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 172 SC

Headnote :

The respondent-assessee, a dealer in tractors, motorcycles, and spare parts, claimed a deduction of Rs. 26,572.82 for tax-exempt goods while filing its quarterly returns. This amount represented the sale proceeds of a belt pulley attachment sold either with the tractor or separately, from its total...
Vinayak Vs. State of Maharashtra [1984] INSC 173 (21 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 21 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 173 SC

Headnote :

In Sessions Case No. 26 of 1976, seven individuals—Sitarama @ Sitya, Sundera @ Sundarayya, Kishana @ Kishanayya, Gangarama @ Gangayya, Prakash, Vinayak, and Shrirang—were jointly charged and tried for offenses under section 302 in conjunction with section 120B, as well as under section 302 in co...
Ayyaswami Gounder & Ors Vs. Munnuswamy Gounder & Ors [1984] INSC 174 (25 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 25 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 174 SC

Headnote :

In approximately 1927, a partition occurred between the parties, resulting in survey Nos. 95 and 96 being allocated to the appellants-plaintiffs, along with 15 cents of land in plot no. 96/5, where the common well W2 is located. However, the common well W2 and the channel connected to it were mainta...
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Kanpur, Vs. Ganga Dal Mill And Co. & Ors [1984] INSC 175 (25 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 25 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 175 SC

Headnote :

The Appellant-Market Committee imposed a market fee on the sale transactions of dal derived from various legumes by the respondents, arguing that these were classified as \'specified agricultural produce\'. Consequently, any sales conducted by the respondents within the Market Area were subject to t...
Gwalior District Co-Operatlve Central Bank Ltd. Gwalior Vs. Ramesh Chandra Mangal & Ors [1984] INSC 176 (26 September 1984

Judgement Date : 26 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 176 SC

Headnote :

The Registrar of Cooperative Societies took over the Board of Directors of the appellant bank, transferring its authority to the M.P. State Cooperative Bank, which acted as the \"officer-in-charge\" of the bank. The Apex Bank then appointed S.P. Jain as the Chief Executive Officer of the appellant b...
Ajay Dixit, N.S.A. Detenu,Through His Next Friendand Father Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1984] INSC 177 (26 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 177 SC

Headnote :

Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereafter referred to as the Act) grants authority to both the Central and State Governments to issue a detention order against any individual if they are convinced that such action is necessary to prevent that person from acting in ways that could ha...
D. Cawasji And Co. Mysore Vs. The State of Mysore & ANR [1984] INSC 178 (26 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 178 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were Excise Contractors who had obtained the privilege to retail Toddy, Arrack, or Special Liquor. The State Government held a monopoly on the initial sale of Arrack, which is a type of country liquor distinct from Toddy. The production of Arrack through distillation occurs under Stat...
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Karnataka Vs. Workmen [1984] INSC 179 (26 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 179 SC

Headnote :

The Government of Karnataka made a reference under section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereafter referred to as \'the Act\') regarding a dispute between the Regional Provident Fund Organisation, established by the Central Government in that State under the Employees\' Provident Fund & M...
Rajinder Kumar Kindra Vs. Delhi Administration & Ors [1984] INSC 180 (27 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 27 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 180 SC

Headnote :

HEADNOTE:The appellant was employed as a salesman at a company\'s showroom. The company issued a charge-sheet against him, citing misconduct. The specific allegation was that he had been negligent in securing his cheque-book for his personal account, which allowed the Manager-cum-Cashier of the show...
Lallu Ram & Ors Vs. State of U.P. & ANR [1984] INSC 181 (27 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 27 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 181 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder of a man named Kunwar Bahadur in the village of Bamori Kalan, District Jalaun, on July 18, 1971. Following a news report published in the Hindi newspaper \'Nav Bharat\' on June 3, 1983, which stated that the body of o...
Banwar Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan [1984] INSC 182 (27 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 27 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 182 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, along with Kanahiya Lal, Ram Niwas, and Badri Lal, was charged under Section 302 in conjunction with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Gyanchand. They were tried by the Sessions Judge in Bhilwara, Rajasthan. The Judge convicted Kanahiya Lal and sentenced him to lif...
Salabuddin Mohamed Yunus Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh [1984] INSC 183 (28 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 183 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was employed by the former Indian State of Hyderabad before the Constitution of India came into effect. Once the Constitution was enacted, the State became part of India as a Part State, and the appellant continued to serve there until his retirement on January 21, 1956. He asserted hi...
Ahmed Hussain Khan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh [1984] INSC 184 (28 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 184 SC

Headnote :

The appellants in Civil Appeals No. 2627 & 2628 of 1977 joined the superior Civil Service of the former Indian State of Hyderabad in 1945 and 1942, respectively. At that time, their service conditions were governed by the Hyderabad Civil Services Regulations, which were established in accordance wit...
Jatinder Kumar & Ors Vs. State of Punjab & Ors [1984] INSC 185 (28 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 185 SC

Headnote :

In response to a request from the Inspector General of Police Punjab to select and recommend qualified individuals for the position of Assistant Sub-Inspectors of Police, there were 57 current vacancies and an additional 170 expected vacancies due to the anticipated reorganization of the Police Forc...
Jaspal Singh Vs. Additional District Judge, Bulandshahr & Ors [1984] INSC 186 (28 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 186 SC

Headnote :

Section 14 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act (hereafter referred to as the Act), both in its original form prior to the 1976 amendment and in its amended version following the U.P. Act No. 28 of 1976, addresses the regularization of the occupation of current t...
Gurpal Tuli & Ors, Vs. State of Punjab & Ors [1984] INSC 187 (28 September 1984)

Judgement Date : 28 Sep 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 187 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, who worked as Masters and Mistresses in High and Higher Secondary Schools operated by the State Government and held M.A., M.Sc., B.T., or B.Ed. degrees, argued in their writ petitions that they were compensated according to the pay scale of Rs. 220-500. They claimed entitlement to on...
Radhey Shyam Vs. Kalyan Mal [1984] INSC 188 (10 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 10 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 188 SC

Headnote :

The landlord, who is the respondent, initiated eviction proceedings against the tenants, who are the appellants, under section 12 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961. The primary reason for the eviction was the landlord\'s genuine need for the premises to establish a factory fo...
M. P. Mittal Vs. State of Haryana & Ors [1984] INSC 189 (10 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 10 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 189 SC

Headnote :

The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited (referred to as the Corporation) underwrote a number of preference shares issued by M/s. Depro Foods Limited. The Managing Director of M/s. Depro Foods Ltd., in his personal capacity, guaranteed the payment of the dividend income owed to t...
Tulsi Ram Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1984] INSC 190 (11 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 11 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 190 SC

Headnote :

Based on the Public Analyst\'s report indicating that the soya bean oil sample purchased by Food Inspector Sorar on November 17, 1979, from the accused\'s shop was found to be adulterated, a complaint was lodged on November 29, 1979, in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate in Balod. On November 17,...
Shri Narakesari Prakashan Ltd & Ors Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation [1984] INSC 191 (15 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 15 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 191 SC

Headnote :

The appellants in this case were newspaper printers and publishers. On October 1, 1975, the Assistant Regional Director of the Employee\'s State Insurance Corporation issued a notice to the appellants, requiring them to make contributions for the administrative and editorial staff of the newspapers,...
K.M. Mohamad Abdul Khader Firm Vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors [1984] INSC 192 (16 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 16 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 192 SC

Headnote :

In Tamil Nadu, the imposition of Sales Tax is governed by the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. In 1970, the State Legislature introduced the Tamil Nadu Additional Sales Tax Act (Act XIV of 1970), which took effect on May 28, 1970. The purpose of Section 2 of this Act was to impose an Addition...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ernakulam (Kerela) Vs. The Official Liquidator, Palai Central Bank Ltd. [1984] INSC 193 (16 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 16 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 193 SC

Headnote :

The assessee company entered liquidation on August 8, 1960. When determining the taxable income for the assessment year 1963-64, the Income-tax officer assessed the company\'s income at Rs. 5,79,978 and believed this amount would also incur a super profits tax liability, prompting him to request the...
Smt. J.S. Rukmani Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu & Ors [1984] INSC 194 (17 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 17 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 194 SC

Headnote :

The State of Tamil Nadu established the New Family Pension Rules in 1964, which provided pension benefits to the families of government employees upon their death. However, this benefit was limited to the families of those government servants who had retired before April 1, 1964.Subsequently, a Noti...
M. Veerabhadra Rao Vs. Tek Chand [1984] INSC 195 (18 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 18 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 195 SC

Headnote :

Rule 34 of the Civil Rules of Practice established by the Andhra Pradesh High Court outlines the officers authorized to administer oaths for affidavits. This includes advocates or pleaders who are not involved in the proceeding at hand. According to Rule 40, the officer before whom an affidavit is t...
Narain Khamman Vs. Parduman Kumar Jain [1984] INSC 196 (19 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 19 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 196 SC

Headnote :

The Appellant was a tenant of the Respondent, who was employed by the Central Government and had been assigned Government housing. A general directive from the Government mandated that all Government employees with their own homes at their posting location must vacate the Government housing provided...
C. Elumalai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [1984] INSC 197 (26 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 197 SC

Headnote :

The Tamil Nadu State Government is prohibited from detaining any adolescent offender convicted of a capital offense and sentenced to life imprisonment, who has been subject to an order under section 10-A of the Tamil Nadu Borstal Schools Act, in a Borstal School or any other form of detention once t...
State of Maharastra Vs. Baburao Ravaji Mharulkar & Ors [1984] INSC 198 (26 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 198 SC

Headnote :

According to the report from the Public Analyst, the ice cream sample purchased by the Food Inspector from the shop of the 4th respondent firm, whose partners are respondents 1 to 3, contained only 5.95% milk fat, which is below the minimum requirement of 10% set by paragraph A 11.02 08 of the Appen...
Hans Raj Vs. State of Punjab & Ors [1984] INSC 199 (26 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 26 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 199 SC

Headnote :

The appellant began his career as a clerk in the former Patiala and East Punjab States Union (PEPSU) on September 2, 1949. As a temporary employee, he was discharged from service on September 30, 1953. He was reappointed as a clerk on February 22, 1954, and subsequently promoted to senior clerk. The...
State of Maharashtra Vs. Narsingrao Gangaram Pimple [1984] INSC 200 (27 October 1984)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1984

Citation : 1984 Latest Caselaw 200 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, a Sub-Inspector of Police, faced charges under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 5(1)(a) and 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution\'s case was based on a complaint filed by one Rege against his tenant Walawalker, alleging that Walawalk...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter