Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of 1969

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

New Savan Sugar & Gur Refining Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Calcutta [1969] INSC 51 (19 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 51 SC

Headnote :

The assessee-company, engaged in the business of crushing sugar cane and refining gur, fearing potential losses, entered into a lease agreement with another company. According to clause (7) of the lease agreement, the consideration for the lease was a royalty based on the production of sugar and mol...

Read full Judgement

Sukhram Singh & ANR Vs. Smt. Harbheji [1969] INSC 52 (19 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, identified as Bhumidhar, submitted an objection under section 240(G) of the U.P. Zamindari and Land Abolition Act, 1961, regarding a preliminary statement prepared by the Compensation Officer under section 240(F), which classified the appellants as Adhivasis of certain land. On Octob...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Calcutta, Nowst Bengal Iii Vs. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Private Ltd. [1969] INSC 53 (20 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 53 SC

Headnote :

The Imperial Chemical Industries (Export) Glasgow was a subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries London. As of April 1, 1948, it terminated the services of four selling agents in India and appointed the respondent company, another subsidiary of Imperial Chemical Industries London, as its exclusive...

Read full Judgement

Karam Chand Thapar & Bros. (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, (Central) Calcutta [1969] INSC 54 (20 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 54 SC

Headnote :

The assessee-company was engaged in coal mining and operated a Dry Ice Factory, among other businesses. It acquired a prospecting license, and shortly after prospecting for coal, it sold the coal, generating profits during the accounting years 1948-49 and 1949-50. The company sold the Ice Factory in...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar, Madurai [1969] INSC 55 (24 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 24 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Headnote :

The respondent's appeal against an order of assessment was rejected by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and he, thereafter appealed to the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal, after having granted some adjournments, dismissed the appeal for default in appearance On a day fixed for the hearing,...

Read full Judgement

H. Vs. Kamath Vs. Ch. Nitiraj Singh [1969] INSC 56 (24 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 24 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Representation of the People Act, 1951

Headnote :

The appellant, who was an unsuccessful candidate, filed an election petition seeking to annul the election of the respondent, who was elected as a Congress candidate for a Parliamentary constituency. The respondent faced allegations of various corrupt practices, including: (i) an ordinance passed by...

Read full Judgement

Jindas Oil Mill & Ors Vs. Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. [1969] INSC 57 (26 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 57 SC

General Clauses Act, 1897
Indian Electricity Act, 1910
Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Headnote :

The respondent possessed a license for the supply of electricity under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 in the Godhra region of undivided Bombay. Following the establishment of the State of Gujarat, this area became part of that state. The Electricity (Supply) Act was enacted in 1948, which stipulat...

Read full Judgement

V. Venugopala Ravi Varma Rajah Vs. Union of India & ANR [1969] INSC 58 (26 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The members of a Hindu undivided family, governed by the Marumakkattayam law, while remaining united, had made an agreement for the separate enjoyment of certain family properties by different members, as allowed by their customary law. For the assessment year 1958-59, the karta, representing the Hi...

Read full Judgement

Jai Narain Vs. Kishen Chand [1969] INSC 59 (27 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Delhi Tenants (Temporary Protection) Act, 1956
Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956
Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956
Slum Areas (Improvement And Clearance) Act, 1956

Headnote :

The landlord, as the respondent, initiated eviction proceedings against the appellant under section 13(1)(k) of the Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952, citing damage to the property as the reason. In February 1959, the trial court ordered the appellant\'s eviction, and the appellate authority up...

Read full Judgement

State of Punjab & Ors Vs. M/S. Chandu Lal Kishori Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 60 (27 February 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Feb 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

Headnote :

The respondent, a dealer, acquired unginned cotton, and after processing it through ginning and seed removal, sold the ginned cotton to customers outside the State. The respondent paid purchase tax on the turnover from these purchases. For the cotton seeds sold to registered dealers, the respondent...

Read full Judgement

Shivashankar Prasad Shah & Ors Vs. Baikunth Nath Singh & Ors [1969] INSC 61 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950
Section 73. TPA, Right to proceeds of revenue sale or compensation on acquisition.

Headnote :

Following the appellants\' acquisition of a preliminary decree (as mortgagees of an Estate that included both Bakasht lands and other properties), the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 was enacted. The appellants subsequently filed a petition for a final decree. The mortgaged Estate was vested in the Sta...

Read full Judgement

Malojirao Narasinghrao Shitole Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1969] INSC 62 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Headnote :

Section 29 of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 (Act 28 of 1951) allowed for appeals against decisions made by the Jagir Commissioner to the Board of Revenue. Such appeals were required to be submitted within 90 days of the decision being communicated to the affected party. The Act did...

Read full Judgement

Mohammad Ismail, Vs. Nanney Lal [1969] INSC 63 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent & Eviction Act, 1947, limits landlords\' ability to initiate eviction lawsuits against their tenants to specific cases outlined in section 3 (1) (a) to (g), unless they receive permission from the District Magistrate. This permission from the District Magistrate...

Read full Judgement

N. Vs. Narendranath Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Andhra Pradesh,Hyderabad [1969] INSC 64 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Wealth Tax Act, 1957

Headnote :

Regarding his wealth tax assessment for the years 1957-58, 1958-59, and 1959-60, the appellant submitted returns as a Hindu Undivided Family. At that time, his family included himself, his wife, and two minor daughters. The appellant argued that he should be assessed as a Hindu Undivided Family beca...

Read full Judgement

V. P. Gopala Rao Vs. Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh [1969] INSC 65 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 65 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who served as both the manager and occupier of a company\'s facility in Eluru, faced prosecution for running a factory without the necessary license as mandated by the Factories Act of 1948 and the Andhra Pradesh Factory Rules of 1950. The company\'s primary factory was located in Bom...

Read full Judgement

Western U.P. Electric Power & Supplycompany Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & ANR [1969] INSC 66 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 66 SC

Constitution of India
Indian Electricity Act, 1910
Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Headnote :

The appellant possesses a license under section 3(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 to provide electricity in specific regions of the State of U.P. The 3rd respondent operated a factory that manufactured electrical equipment within the appellant\'s supply area and was receiving energy from the...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bihar Vs. Ramniklal Kothari [1969] INSC 67 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was engaged in various business activities as a partner in four different firms. For the assessment years 1955-56 and 1956-57, he reported his share of profits from these firms and sought deductions for salaries and bonuses paid to staff, expenses related to the maintenance and deprec...

Read full Judgement

Arati Paul Vs. The Registrar, Original Side, High Court Calcutta & Ors [1969] INSC 68 (10 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 10 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 68 SC

Headnote :

When a partition suit and connected testamentary suit were pending before a Judge on the original side of the High Court of Calcutta, the parties filed an agreement before the Judge and got it recorded that the matters in dispute in both the suits were to be referred to the sole arbitration of that...

Read full Judgement

State of Maharashtra Vs. Baishankar Avalram Joshi & ANR [1969] INSC 69 (10 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 10 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 69 SC

Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960
Constitution of India

Headnote :

In March 1954, the first respondent, who was serving as a Senior Jailor, was suspended due to allegations of misappropriation and mistreatment of prisoners. Following this, in January 1955, he received a show cause notice, to which he responded in writing. Subsequently, in February 1955, he was dism...

Read full Judgement

Shaik Mohammad Umar Saheb Vs. Kalaskar Hasham Karimsab & Ors [1969] INSC 70 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India
CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965
Representation of the People Act, 1951

Headnote :

The first respondent contested the appellant\'s election to the Sangli City Municipality, which took place in June 1967, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965. It was claimed that the respondent had disseminated pamphlets containing defamatory remarks against him, specific...

Read full Judgement

Beohar Rajendra Sinha & Ors Vs. State of M.P. & Ors [1969] INSC 71 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 71 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The appellant, who was the Karta of a Hindu Joint Family at the time, issued a notice to the respondent State in January 1954 under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code. Subsequently, a lawsuit was initiated in July 1954, after a partition had occurred within the family. As a result, the appellant...

Read full Judgement

Praduman Kumar Vs. Virendra Goyal [1969] INSC 72 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 72 SC

Section 114. TPA, Relief against forfeiture for non-payment of rent.
Section 4. TPA, Enactments relating to contracts to be taken as part of Contract Act and supplemental to the Registration Act.

Namdeo Lokman Lodhi Vs. Narmadabai & Ors [1953] INSC 15 (27 February 1953)

Headnote :

In a land lease agreement, it was stipulated that if rent remained unpaid for two consecutive years, the tenancy rights would be forfeited. After the rent was overdue for two years, the landlord initiated legal action to evict the tenants and recover the unpaid rent along with compensation. The tena...

Read full Judgement

Giani Ram & Ors Vs. Ramji Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 73 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 73 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Headnote :

J, a Hindu Jat subject to the Punjab Customary Laws, sold a fourth share of his ancestral land to S in 1916 without any legal necessity. According to the Punjab Customary Laws, female heirs were not permitted to contest a sale of ancestral property made by a male owner. In 1920, J\'s son G filed sui...

Read full Judgement

Heavy Engineering Mazdoor Union Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors [1969] INSC 74 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited was established under the Companies Act, with its entire share capital provided by the Central Government, classifying it as a Government Company under section 617 of the Companies Act. Its Memorandum and Articles granted significant powers to the Central Go...

Read full Judgement

Goppulal Vs. Thakurji Shriji Shriji Dwarkadheeshji & ANR [1969] INSC 75 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Headnote :

The landlord, who is the respondent, initially rented out four shops to the appellant and later leased two additional shops to him. The landlord subsequently filed a lawsuit claiming that after the rental agreement, the rent was consolidated and increased, and that the appellant had sublet the shops...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bihar & Orissa,Patna Vs. M/S. Kirkend Coal Company [1969] INSC 76 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 76 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was a partnership that faced a penalty under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, imposed by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment year 1948.49. At the time the penalty was imposed, the firm\'s constitution had changed, although the reconstituted firm continued the...

Read full Judgement

Swaran Lata Ghosh Vs. H. K. Banerjee & ANR [1969] INSC 77 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

Following the death of the appellant\'s husband, who was a practicing attorney, the first respondent initiated a lawsuit in the original jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court against the appellant and her minor son, seeking a decree for Rs. 15,000 plus interest. The claim was based on the assertio...

Read full Judgement

State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors Vs. Shah Mohammad & ANR [1969] INSC 78 (13 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 13 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Citizenship Rules, 1956

Headnote :

Respondent No. 1 was born in undivided India on July 3, 1934, and moved to Pakistan in October 1950. In 1953, he obtained a visa from the Indian High Commission in Pakistan and returned to India on July 22, 1953. After his visa expired, he sought to settle permanently in India. On May 6, 1955, he fi...

Read full Judgement

Amritsagar Gupta & Ors Vs. Sudesh Behari Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 79 (13 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 13 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 79 SC

Headnote :

A legal dispute arose between J, the father of the appellants, and B, the father of the respondents, with both parties claiming ownership of the contested properties based on an alleged gift deed in their favor. The court ruled in favor of J, and this decision was upheld by this Court. Despite sever...

Read full Judgement

Kartar Singh Vs. Chaman Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 80 (14 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 14 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 80 SC

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Headnote :

The respondents\' predecessor-in-interest, who was a practicing lawyer, rented certain premises for residential purposes. With the written consent of the appellant-landlord, he was also allowed to establish his professional office there. After the predecessor\'s death, the respondents continued to r...

Read full Judgement

Netherlands Steam Navigation Company Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1969] INSC 81 (14 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 14 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 81 SC

Headnote :

The appellant is a shipping company based outside India, with a local office in Calcutta. For the income tax assessments for the years 1952-53 to 1956-57, the appellant submitted returns that reported taxable income based on its annual turnover from Indian trade, but did not provide details of its g...

Read full Judgement

S. Jhansi Lakshmi Bai & Ors Vs. Pothana Apparao & Ors [1969] INSC 82 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 82 SC

Indian Succession Act, 1925

Headnote :

A Hindu created a will instructing his wife to sell the property listed in Schedule C and use the proceeds to fund the marriage of one Sitharathnam and to build a Ramamandiram in his name. Additionally, he specified that his wife would have full ownership of the property in Schedule E, and upon her...

Read full Judgement

Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal Vs. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon [1969] INSC 83 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 83 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

Manoharlal, son of Jai Jai Ram, initiated a lawsuit in the Subordinate Judge\'s Court to recover the value of timber supplied to the defendant. The case was filed under the name \'Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal\', which was the name used for the business. The plaintiff signed and verified the complaint as...

Read full Judgement

Ranjit Chandra Chowdhury Vs. Mohitosh Mukherjee [1969] INSC 84 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Section 113. TPA,Waiver of notice to quit.

Ganga Dutt Murarka Vs. Kartik Chandra Das & Ors [1961] INSC 46 (10 February 1961)

Headnote :

The tenancy agreement between the landlord and tenant for specific premises stipulated that the monthly rent was to be paid on or before the 7th of each month. However, from September 1954 to April 1955, the rent was paid after the agreed date. In August 1955, the landlord issued a notice to termina...

Read full Judgement

Tulsipur Sugar Company Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1969] INSC 85 (18 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 85 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The Central Wage Board for the sugar industry recommended new wage scales, revised categories, and the placement of workers into these scales and categories effective from November 1, 1960. The State Government fully accepted these recommendations, including the implementation date.However, the appe...

Read full Judgement

Town Municipal Council, Athani Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli & Ors [1969] INSC 86 (20 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 86 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Limitation Act, 1963
Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Payment of Wages Act, 1936
Payment of Wages Act, 1936

Headnote :

The Labour Court accepted the applications from the appellant\'s workers regarding the calculation of their benefits for overtime and work performed on weekly off-days, as per section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court calculated the amounts owed to the various workers and ordere...

Read full Judgement

Balak Singh Vs. Waqf Alee Allah Kayam Karda Ahmad Ullahkhan Saheb [1969] INSC 87 (20 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 87 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The appellant was a tenant of the respondent Wakf. The respondent secured a decree for unpaid rent against the appellant but was unable to enforce it through the attachment of crops, as the appellant had already removed them. Subsequently, the respondent filed an application under section 168 of the...

Read full Judgement

Mani Mani & Ors Vs. Mani Joshua [1969] INSC 88 (21 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 21 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

In a settlement deed from 1935, the owner of certain properties allocated three items of property to his wife and two sons, with each receiving one item. The properties were subsequently mutated in favor of the beneficiaries. Later, the owner executed three wills, with the last will explicitly stati...

Read full Judgement

Shri Vidya Prachar Trust Vs. Pandit Basant Ram [1969] INSC 89 (21 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 21 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 89 SC

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1947

Headnote :

The appellant landlord made an application under s. 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for the respondent's eviction from certain premises on the ground that the -rent 'for the premises from October 1959 to June 1961 had -not been paid. On the first day of hearing the res...

Read full Judgement

Khemchand Dayalji & Co. Vs. Mohammedbhai Chandbhai [1969] INSC 90 (24 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 24 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 90 SC

Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887

Headnote :

Jurisdiction to try suits and proceedings between landlords and tenants under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 57 of 1947 was by virtue of s. 28 of the Act given to Small Cause Courts. Under s. 49 of the Act the State Government was authorised to make rules for the purpose...

Read full Judgement

Digyadarsan Rajendra Ramdassji Varu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & ANR [1969] INSC 91 (26 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 91 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India

Headnote :

On November 18, 1968, the petitioner, who served as the Mathadhipathi of Sri Swami Hathiramji Math in Tirupathi-Thirumalla, faced fourteen charges under section 46(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act of 1966. Following section 46(3), he was suspend...

Read full Judgement

Rev. Mons. Sebastiao Francisco Xavier Dos.Remedios Monte Vs. State of Goa [1969] INSC 92 (26 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 92 SC

Citizenship Act, 1955
Geneva Conventions Act, 1960

Headnote :

The Geneva Conventions Act 6 of 1960 was enacted by the Indian Parliament to implement the International Conventions established in Geneva in 1949. Both India and Portugal have signed and ratified these Conventions. The four Conventions are included in separate Schedules of the Act. The Fourth Conve...

Read full Judgement

Collector of Customs & Ors Vs. M/S. Soorajmull Nagarmull & ANR [1969] INSC 93 (28 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The respondent initiated legal action against the Collector of Customs and the Union of India, seeking a refund for the excess customs duty imposed on spindle oil imported into India. The trial court ruled in favor of the respondent, issuing decrees against the Union of India for the overcharged amo...

Read full Judgement

A.V. S. Narasimha Rao & Ors Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & ANR [1969] INSC 94 (28 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 94 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Parliament passed the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 in accordance with clause (3) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India, which establishes specific residency requirements for public employment. Section 3 of the Act authorized the creation of rules regarding certa...

Read full Judgement

Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Faizabad Vs. Shambhoo Narain Singh [1969] INSC 95 (31 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 95 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 21. Public Servant

Headnote :

The individual was elected as the Pradhan of a Gram Sabha in Uttar Pradesh. The government, as the appellant, issued an order suspending the individual and instructed them to hand over their responsibilities to the up-pradhan while an inquiry was ongoing. The individual then filed a writ petition in...

Read full Judgement

Mohd. Hussain Umar Kochra Vs. K. S. Dalipsinghji & ANR [1969] INSC 96 (31 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy

Headnote :

The appellants, along with several other defendants, were tried for the crime of criminal conspiracy to import and trade in gold, which is punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code in conjunction with Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, as well as for substantive offenses puni...

Read full Judgement

Union of India Vs. Jagjit Singh [1969] INSC 97 (1 April 1969)

Judgement Date : 01 Apr 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Government of India Act, 1935
Police Act, 1861
Police Act, 1861

Delhi Administration Vs. Chanan Shah [1969] INSC 36 (12 February 1969)

Headnote :

The individual in question, who was appointed as a Sub-Inspector of Police, began his posting in Delhi in 1949. A retired Deputy Superintendent of Police from the City of Delhi was assigned to carry out a departmental inquiry against him. This inquiring officer was reemployed as a Deputy Superintend...

Read full Judgement

Mohd. Faruk Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors [1969] INSC 98 (1 April 1969)

Judgement Date : 01 Apr 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Jabalpur Municipality established certain bye-laws that allowed the slaughter of various animals, including bulls and bullocks, which were ratified by the State Government in 1948. However, on January 12, 1967, the State Government issued a notification, exercising its authority under section 43...

Read full Judgement

Bennett Coleman & Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Punya Priya Das Gupta [1969] INSC 99 (2 April 1969)

Judgement Date : 02 Apr 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Minimum Wages Act, 1948
Minimum Wages Act, 1948

Headnote :

In October 1963, the respondent served as the special correspondent for the appellant company and was entitled to a car allowance, free telephone service, and free newspapers, in addition to his basic salary and dearness allowance. On October 8, he submitted his resignation, which was accepted on Oc...

Read full Judgement

Rt. Rev. Bishop S. K. Patro & Ors Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1969] INSC 100 (2 April 1969)

Judgement Date : 02 Apr 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 100 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Government of Bihar established certain regulations under the Bihar High School (Control and Regulation of Administration) Act 13 of 1960. According to Rule 41, these regulations do not apply to schools that are founded and run by minorities, whether based on religion or language. A school that...

Read full Judgement

«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs