Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Shivashankar Prasad Shah & Ors Vs. Baikunth Nath Singh & Ors [1969] INSC 61 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

Following the appellants\' acquisition of a preliminary decree (as mortgagees of an Estate that included both Bakasht lands and other properties), the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 was enacted. The appellants subsequently filed a petition for a final decree. The mortgaged Estate was vested in the Sta...
Malojirao Narasinghrao Shitole Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1969] INSC 62 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Headnote :

Section 29 of the Madhya Bharat Abolition of Jagirs Act, 1951 (Act 28 of 1951) allowed for appeals against decisions made by the Jagir Commissioner to the Board of Revenue. Such appeals were required to be submitted within 90 days of the decision being communicated to the affected party. The Act did...
Mohammad Ismail, Vs. Nanney Lal [1969] INSC 63 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Headnote :

The U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent & Eviction Act, 1947, limits landlords\' ability to initiate eviction lawsuits against their tenants to specific cases outlined in section 3 (1) (a) to (g), unless they receive permission from the District Magistrate. This permission from the District Magistrate...
N. Vs. Narendranath Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Andhra Pradesh,Hyderabad [1969] INSC 64 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

Regarding his wealth tax assessment for the years 1957-58, 1958-59, and 1959-60, the appellant submitted returns as a Hindu Undivided Family. At that time, his family included himself, his wife, and two minor daughters. The appellant argued that he should be assessed as a Hindu Undivided Family beca...
V. P. Gopala Rao Vs. Public Prosecutor, Andhra Pradesh [1969] INSC 65 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 65 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who served as both the manager and occupier of a company\'s facility in Eluru, faced prosecution for running a factory without the necessary license as mandated by the Factories Act of 1948 and the Andhra Pradesh Factory Rules of 1950. The company\'s primary factory was located in Bom...
Western U.P. Electric Power & Supplycompany Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & ANR [1969] INSC 66 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 66 SC

Headnote :

The appellant possesses a license under section 3(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 to provide electricity in specific regions of the State of U.P. The 3rd respondent operated a factory that manufactured electrical equipment within the appellant\'s supply area and was receiving energy from the...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bihar Vs. Ramniklal Kothari [1969] INSC 67 (7 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 07 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was engaged in various business activities as a partner in four different firms. For the assessment years 1955-56 and 1956-57, he reported his share of profits from these firms and sought deductions for salaries and bonuses paid to staff, expenses related to the maintenance and deprec...
Arati Paul Vs. The Registrar, Original Side, High Court Calcutta & Ors [1969] INSC 68 (10 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 10 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 68 SC

Headnote :

When a partition suit and connected testamentary suit were pending before a Judge on the original side of the High Court of Calcutta, the parties filed an agreement before the Judge and got it recorded that the matters in dispute in both the suits were to be referred to the sole arbitration of that...
State of Maharashtra Vs. Baishankar Avalram Joshi & ANR [1969] INSC 69 (10 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 10 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 69 SC

Headnote :

In March 1954, the first respondent, who was serving as a Senior Jailor, was suspended due to allegations of misappropriation and mistreatment of prisoners. Following this, in January 1955, he received a show cause notice, to which he responded in writing. Subsequently, in February 1955, he was dism...
Shaik Mohammad Umar Saheb Vs. Kalaskar Hasham Karimsab & Ors [1969] INSC 70 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Headnote :

The first respondent contested the appellant\'s election to the Sangli City Municipality, which took place in June 1967, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965. It was claimed that the respondent had disseminated pamphlets containing defamatory remarks against him, specific...
Beohar Rajendra Sinha & Ors Vs. State of M.P. & Ors [1969] INSC 71 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 71 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who was the Karta of a Hindu Joint Family at the time, issued a notice to the respondent State in January 1954 under section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code. Subsequently, a lawsuit was initiated in July 1954, after a partition had occurred within the family. As a result, the appellant...
Praduman Kumar Vs. Virendra Goyal [1969] INSC 72 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 72 SC

Headnote :

In a land lease agreement, it was stipulated that if rent remained unpaid for two consecutive years, the tenancy rights would be forfeited. After the rent was overdue for two years, the landlord initiated legal action to evict the tenants and recover the unpaid rent along with compensation. The tena...
Giani Ram & Ors Vs. Ramji Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 73 (11 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 11 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 73 SC

Headnote :

J, a Hindu Jat subject to the Punjab Customary Laws, sold a fourth share of his ancestral land to S in 1916 without any legal necessity. According to the Punjab Customary Laws, female heirs were not permitted to contest a sale of ancestral property made by a male owner. In 1920, J\'s son G filed sui...
Heavy Engineering Mazdoor Union Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors [1969] INSC 74 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Headnote :

The Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited was established under the Companies Act, with its entire share capital provided by the Central Government, classifying it as a Government Company under section 617 of the Companies Act. Its Memorandum and Articles granted significant powers to the Central Go...
Goppulal Vs. Thakurji Shriji Shriji Dwarkadheeshji & ANR [1969] INSC 75 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Headnote :

The landlord, who is the respondent, initially rented out four shops to the appellant and later leased two additional shops to him. The landlord subsequently filed a lawsuit claiming that after the rental agreement, the rent was consolidated and increased, and that the appellant had sublet the shops...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bihar & Orissa,Patna Vs. M/S. Kirkend Coal Company [1969] INSC 76 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 76 SC

Headnote :

The respondent was a partnership that faced a penalty under section 28(1)(c) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, imposed by the Income-tax Officer for the assessment year 1948.49. At the time the penalty was imposed, the firm\'s constitution had changed, although the reconstituted firm continued the...
Swaran Lata Ghosh Vs. H. K. Banerjee & ANR [1969] INSC 77 (12 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 12 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Headnote :

Following the death of the appellant\'s husband, who was a practicing attorney, the first respondent initiated a lawsuit in the original jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court against the appellant and her minor son, seeking a decree for Rs. 15,000 plus interest. The claim was based on the assertio...
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors Vs. Shah Mohammad & ANR [1969] INSC 78 (13 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 13 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Headnote :

Respondent No. 1 was born in undivided India on July 3, 1934, and moved to Pakistan in October 1950. In 1953, he obtained a visa from the Indian High Commission in Pakistan and returned to India on July 22, 1953. After his visa expired, he sought to settle permanently in India. On May 6, 1955, he fi...
Amritsagar Gupta & Ors Vs. Sudesh Behari Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 79 (13 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 13 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 79 SC

Headnote :

A legal dispute arose between J, the father of the appellants, and B, the father of the respondents, with both parties claiming ownership of the contested properties based on an alleged gift deed in their favor. The court ruled in favor of J, and this decision was upheld by this Court. Despite sever...
Kartar Singh Vs. Chaman Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 80 (14 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 14 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 80 SC

Headnote :

The respondents\' predecessor-in-interest, who was a practicing lawyer, rented certain premises for residential purposes. With the written consent of the appellant-landlord, he was also allowed to establish his professional office there. After the predecessor\'s death, the respondents continued to r...
Netherlands Steam Navigation Company Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1969] INSC 81 (14 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 14 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 81 SC

Headnote :

The appellant is a shipping company based outside India, with a local office in Calcutta. For the income tax assessments for the years 1952-53 to 1956-57, the appellant submitted returns that reported taxable income based on its annual turnover from Indian trade, but did not provide details of its g...
S. Jhansi Lakshmi Bai & Ors Vs. Pothana Apparao & Ors [1969] INSC 82 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 82 SC

Headnote :

A Hindu created a will instructing his wife to sell the property listed in Schedule C and use the proceeds to fund the marriage of one Sitharathnam and to build a Ramamandiram in his name. Additionally, he specified that his wife would have full ownership of the property in Schedule E, and upon her...
Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal Vs. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon [1969] INSC 83 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 83 SC

Headnote :

Manoharlal, son of Jai Jai Ram, initiated a lawsuit in the Subordinate Judge\'s Court to recover the value of timber supplied to the defendant. The case was filed under the name \'Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal\', which was the name used for the business. The plaintiff signed and verified the complaint as...
Ranjit Chandra Chowdhury Vs. Mohitosh Mukherjee [1969] INSC 84 (17 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Headnote :

The tenancy agreement between the landlord and tenant for specific premises stipulated that the monthly rent was to be paid on or before the 7th of each month. However, from September 1954 to April 1955, the rent was paid after the agreed date. In August 1955, the landlord issued a notice to termina...
Tulsipur Sugar Company Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1969] INSC 85 (18 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 85 SC

Headnote :

The Central Wage Board for the sugar industry recommended new wage scales, revised categories, and the placement of workers into these scales and categories effective from November 1, 1960. The State Government fully accepted these recommendations, including the implementation date.However, the appe...
Town Municipal Council, Athani Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hubli & Ors [1969] INSC 86 (20 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 86 SC

Headnote :

The Labour Court accepted the applications from the appellant\'s workers regarding the calculation of their benefits for overtime and work performed on weekly off-days, as per section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court calculated the amounts owed to the various workers and ordere...
Balak Singh Vs. Waqf Alee Allah Kayam Karda Ahmad Ullahkhan Saheb [1969] INSC 87 (20 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 87 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a tenant of the respondent Wakf. The respondent secured a decree for unpaid rent against the appellant but was unable to enforce it through the attachment of crops, as the appellant had already removed them. Subsequently, the respondent filed an application under section 168 of the...
Mani Mani & Ors Vs. Mani Joshua [1969] INSC 88 (21 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 21 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

In a settlement deed from 1935, the owner of certain properties allocated three items of property to his wife and two sons, with each receiving one item. The properties were subsequently mutated in favor of the beneficiaries. Later, the owner executed three wills, with the last will explicitly stati...
Shri Vidya Prachar Trust Vs. Pandit Basant Ram [1969] INSC 89 (21 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 21 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 89 SC

Headnote :

The appellant landlord made an application under s. 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 for the respondent's eviction from certain premises on the ground that the -rent 'for the premises from October 1959 to June 1961 had -not been paid. On the first day of hearing the res...
Khemchand Dayalji & Co. Vs. Mohammedbhai Chandbhai [1969] INSC 90 (24 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 24 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 90 SC

Headnote :

Jurisdiction to try suits and proceedings between landlords and tenants under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act 57 of 1947 was by virtue of s. 28 of the Act given to Small Cause Courts. Under s. 49 of the Act the State Government was authorised to make rules for the purpose...
Digyadarsan Rajendra Ramdassji Varu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & ANR [1969] INSC 91 (26 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 91 SC

Headnote :

On November 18, 1968, the petitioner, who served as the Mathadhipathi of Sri Swami Hathiramji Math in Tirupathi-Thirumalla, faced fourteen charges under section 46(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act of 1966. Following section 46(3), he was suspend...
Rev. Mons. Sebastiao Francisco Xavier Dos.Remedios Monte Vs. State of Goa [1969] INSC 92 (26 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 92 SC

Headnote :

The Geneva Conventions Act 6 of 1960 was enacted by the Indian Parliament to implement the International Conventions established in Geneva in 1949. Both India and Portugal have signed and ratified these Conventions. The four Conventions are included in separate Schedules of the Act. The Fourth Conve...
Collector of Customs & Ors Vs. M/S. Soorajmull Nagarmull & ANR [1969] INSC 93 (28 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

The respondent initiated legal action against the Collector of Customs and the Union of India, seeking a refund for the excess customs duty imposed on spindle oil imported into India. The trial court ruled in favor of the respondent, issuing decrees against the Union of India for the overcharged amo...
A.V. S. Narasimha Rao & Ors Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh & ANR [1969] INSC 94 (28 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 94 SC

Headnote :

The Parliament passed the Public Employment (Requirement as to Residence) Act, 1957 in accordance with clause (3) of Article 16 of the Constitution of India, which establishes specific residency requirements for public employment. Section 3 of the Act authorized the creation of rules regarding certa...
Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Faizabad Vs. Shambhoo Narain Singh [1969] INSC 95 (31 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 95 SC

Headnote :

The individual was elected as the Pradhan of a Gram Sabha in Uttar Pradesh. The government, as the appellant, issued an order suspending the individual and instructed them to hand over their responsibilities to the up-pradhan while an inquiry was ongoing. The individual then filed a writ petition in...
Mohd. Hussain Umar Kochra Vs. K. S. Dalipsinghji & ANR [1969] INSC 96 (31 March 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Mar 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Headnote :

The appellants, along with several other defendants, were tried for the crime of criminal conspiracy to import and trade in gold, which is punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code in conjunction with Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, as well as for substantive offenses puni...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter