Tuesday, 07, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University

Category SideBar

Section 60. TPA, Right of mortgagor to redeem.


<p align="left">At any time after the principal money has become <b><sup>1</sup></b>[due], the mortgagor has a right, on payment or tender, at a proper time and place, of the mortgage-money, to require the mortgagee (a) to deliver <b><sup>2</sup></b>[to the mortgagor the mortgage-deed and all documents relating to the mortgaged property which are in the possession or power of the mortgagee], (b) where the mortgagee is in possession of the mortgaged property, to deliver possession thereof to the mortgagor, and (c) at the cost of the mortgagor either to re-transfer the mortgaged property to him or to such third person as he may direct, or to execute and (where the mortgage has been effected by a registered instrument) to have registered an acknowledgement in writing that any right in derogation of his interest transferred to the mortgagee has been extinguished:</p>

<p align="left">Provided that the right conferred by this section has not been extinguished by act of the parties or by <b><sup>3</sup></b>[decree] of a Court.</p>

<p align="left">The right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption.</p>

<p align="left">Nothing in this section shall be deemed to render invalid any provision to the effect that, if the time fixed for payment of the principal money has been allowed to pass or no such time has been fixed, the mortgagee shall be entitled to reasonable notice before payment or tender of such money.</p>

<p align="left"><strong>COMMENTS</strong></p>

<p align="left">Extinguishment of mortgage right</p>

<p align="left">When a mortgagee acquires a portion of the equity of redemption, the mortgage is not extinguished completely. There can be only a pro tanto extinguishment of the mortgage right to the extent of the mortgagee acquiring the mortgagor’s interest and so far as the other sharer of the equity of redemption is concerned, the mortgage will subsist; Madhavan Nair v. Ramankutty Menon, AIR 1994 Ker 75.</p>

<p align="left">Redemption of mortgage</p>

<p align="left">During the continuation of tenancy if a contract of mortgage is created, the contract of lease would not get merged into contract of mortgage. On redemption of mortgage the leasehold rights get revived; M.C. Venkateshappa v. K.N. Sadashivaiah, AIR 2004 Kant 438.</p>

<p align="left">Redemption of portion of mortgaged property.—Nothing in this section shall entitle a person interested in a share only of the mortgaged property to redeem his own share only, on payment of a proportionate part of the amount remaining due on the mortgage, except <b><sup>4</sup></b>[only] where a mortgagee, or, if there are more mortgagees than one, all such mortgagees, has or have acquired, in whole or in part, the share of a mortgagor.</p>

<p align="left">———————-</p>

<p align="left"><b>1. Subs. by Act 20 of 1929, sec. 22, for “payable”.</b></p>

<p align="left"><b>2. Subs. by Act 20 of 1929, sec. 22, for “the mortgage-deed, if any to the mortgagor”.</b></p>

<p align="left"><b>3. Subs. by Act 20 of 1929, sec. 22, for “order”.</b></p>

<p align="left"><b>4. Ins. by Act 20 of 1929, sec. 22.</b></p>
 

Help us improve! Please suggest corrections.
 

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Related judgement on Section 60. TPA, Right of mortgagor to redeem.

M.SIDDIQ (D) vs. MAHANT SURESH DAS, 2019 Latest Caselaw 1091 SC SHAKEENA vs. BANK OF INDIA AND ORS, 2019 Latest Caselaw 737 SC Jamila Begum (D) through LRS. Vs. Shami Mohd. (D) through LRS., 2018 Latest Caselaw 940 SC Allokam Peddabbayya and another Vs. Allahabad Bank and Others [June 19, 2017], 2017 Latest Caselaw 432 SC Dr. Thakar Singh (D) by LRS.& ANR. Vs. Sh. Mula Singh (D) Thr. LR. & Ors. [October 14, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 649 SC Singh Ram (D) Thr. L.Rs. Vs. Sheo Ram & Ors. [August 21, 2014], 2014 Latest Caselaw 512 SC M/s. L. K. Trust Vs. EDC Ltd. & Ors, 2011 Latest Caselaw 388 SC Philomina Jose Vs. Federal Bank Ltd. & Ors [2006] Insc 52 (2 February 2006), 2006 Latest Caselaw 52 SC Hamzabi & Ors Vs. Syed Karimuddin & Ors [2000] INSC 586 (28 November 2000), 2000 Latest Caselaw 581 SC Shri Shivdev Singh & ANR Vs. Sh.Sucha Singh & ANR [2000] INSC 172 (31 March 2000), 2000 Latest Caselaw 169 SC Mancheri Puthusseri Ahmed & Ors Vs. Kuthiravattam Estate Receiver [1996] INSC 1112 (11 September 1996), 1996 Latest Caselaw 750 SC New Kenilworth Hotels (P) Ltd. Vs. Ashoka Industries Ltd. [1994] INSC 520 (17 October 1994), 1994 Latest Caselaw 514 SC Parameswaran Govindan Vs. Krishnan Bhaskaran & Ors [1992] INSC 40 (6 February 1992), 1992 Latest Caselaw 40 SC Harbans Singh Vs. Guran Ditta Singh [1991] INSC 54 (20 February 1991), 1991 Latest Caselaw 54 SC Maganlal Vs. Jaiswal Industries Neemach & Ors [1989] NSC 227 (7 August 1989), 1989 Latest Caselaw 227 SC Carona Shoe Co. Ltd. & ANR Vs. K.C. Bhaskaran Nair [1989] INSC 81 (9 March 1989), 1989 Latest Caselaw 81 SC Pomal Kanji Govindji & Ors Vs. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit & Ors [1988] INSC 344 (4 November 1988), 1988 Latest Caselaw 340 SC Mhadagonda Ramgonda Patil & Ors Vs. Shripal Balwant Rainade & Ors [1988] INSC 116 (22 April 1988), 1988 Latest Caselaw 116 SC Chhaganlal Keshavlal Mehta Vs. Patel Narandas Haribhai [1981] INSC 204 (11 December 1981), 1981 Latest Caselaw 204 SC Narandas Karsondas Vs. S.A. Kamtam & ANR [1976] INSC 315 (7 December 1976), 1976 Latest Caselaw 315 SC Sachdanand Prasad Vs. Babu Sheo Prasad Singh [1965] INSC 133 (6 May 1965), 1965 Latest Caselaw 133 SC Prithi Nath Singh & Ors Vs. Suraj Ahir & Ors [1962] INSC 202 (4 May 1962), 1962 Latest Caselaw 202 SC Seth Ganga Dhar Vs. Shankar Lal & Ors [1958] INSC 44 (15 April 1958), 1958 Latest Caselaw 44 SC Kidar Lall Seal & ANR Vs. Hari Lall Seal [1951] INSC 59 (18 December 1951), 1951 Latest Caselaw 59 SC