2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Director of Horticulture, Odisha v. Pravat Kumar Dash

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 701 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 311, and the Orissa Civil Services Rules, 1962.

Read full Judgement

State of Andhra Pradesh v. B. Ranga Reddy

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 702 SC

ccc
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

S. Nazeer Ahmed Vs. State Bank of Mysore & Ors [2007] Insc 36 (12 January 2007)
Ganga Bai Vs. Vijay Kumar & Ors [1974] INSC 85 (9 April 1974)

Headnote :

Order 14, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

R. Jayapal v. State of Tamil Nadu

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 703 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 300. Murder
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 341. Punishment for wrongful restraint.

Darshan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [January 06, 2016]
Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [DECEMBER 2, 2016]
Darshan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2007] Insc 124 (13 February 2007)
Gurcharan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1993] INSC 505 (25 November 1993)
Charan Singh & Ors Vs. State of Punjab [1974] INSC 129 (26 July 1974)
Gurcharan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1962] INSC 229 (10 August 1962)
Darshan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1952] INSC 66 (5 December 1952)

Headnote :

A. Under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the acquittal of a co-accused raises questions about the propriety of the conviction of the accused. The appellant, along with his brother and wife, was charged with acting in furtherance of a common intention when they confronted the deceased as...

Read full Judgement

Nareshbhai Bhagubhai v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 704 SC

Advocates Act, 1961
Constitution of India
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
National Highways Act, 1956
National Highways Act, 1956
Railways (Amendment) Act, 2008
Railways Act, 1989

State of Punjab Vs. Gurdial Singh & Ors [1979] INSC 220 (25 October 1979)
A.K. Kraipak & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1969] INSC 129 (29 April 1969)

Headnote :

Section 20 of the Railways Act, 1989 and the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) Through Its Chairman v. State of Punjab

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 705 SC

Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985
Societies Registration Act, 1860
University Grants Commission Act, 1956

Mohan Singh Vs. State of Punjab [1962] INSC 98 (15 March 1962)

Headnote :

Section 22(1) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 and the All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987.[Para ]

Read full Judgement

Venkitalakshmi v. K. Raju

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 706 SC

Headnote :

According to Article 136 of the Constitution of India, 1950, and Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the High Court determined that the Plaintiff did not demonstrate that the deadline for completing the transaction was extended. This finding is not erroneous. Once the notion that the tim...

Read full Judgement

Ashok Kumar v. Depinder Singh Dhesi

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 707 SC

J.S. Parihar Vs. Ganpat Duggar & Ors [1996] INSC 1118 (11 September 1996)

Headnote :

The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(b), addresses noncompliance with court orders. It was determined that degrees obtained through Distance Education Mode were not legally valid. However, students who enrolled between 2001 and 2005 were granted two opportunities to demonstrate their qualific...

Read full Judgement

Assam Public Works v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 708 SC

Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003
Citizenship Act, 1955

Headnote :

The Citizenship Act of 1955, specifically Sections 3 and 6A, along with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules 2003, Rule 4A, pertains to the creation of the National Register of Indian Citizens in Assam. In its order dated July 23, 2019, the Court refe...

Read full Judgement

Nareshbhai Bhagubhai v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 709 SC

State of Punjab Vs. Gurdial Singh & Ors [1979] INSC 220 (25 October 1979)
A.K. Kraipak & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1969] INSC 129 (29 April 1969)

Headnote :

A. Under Section 20 of the Railways Act, 1989 and Section 20(D) of the Railways (Amendment) Act, 2008, regarding acquisition proceedings, it is noted that objections must be properly addressed. The oral communication of orders and notes made on internal files do not fulfill the legal requirements. T...

Read full Judgement

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/s. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 710 SC

Income Tax Act, 1961

Headnote :

The Income Tax Act of 1961, specifically Sections 92 and 143(3), pertains to transfer pricing and additional assessments. The respondent received a certain amount of brokerage from its parent company. During the assessment proceedings, the respondent was instructed to provide details regarding the p...

Read full Judgement

Thankamony Amma v. Omana Amma N.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 711 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Headnote :

The Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act of 1965, Section 20, addresses the relationship between landlord and tenant. It clarifies that when the High Court is exercising its revisional powers, it is not permitted to reassess the evidence or the concurrent findings made by the lower courts....

Read full Judgement

Madhukar Nivrutti Jagtap v. Smt. Pramilabai Chandulal Parandekar

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 712 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Indian Contract Act, 1872
Specific Relief Act, 1963
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Sarvinder Singh Vs. Dalip Singh & Ors [1996] INSC 885 (2 August 1996)

Headnote :

A. Under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the principle of lis pendens does not render transactions occurring during the pendency of a lawsuit illegal or void from the outset. Instead, the doctrine of lis pendens serves to ensure that such transactions are subordinate to the rights...

Read full Judgement

Thankamony Amma v. Omana Amma N.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 713 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Headnote :

Section 20 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Venkitalakshmi v. K. Raju

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 714 SC

Headnote :

Article 136(1) of the Constitution of India, 1950.

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Laxman Das Khandelwal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 715 SC

Gwalior
Income Tax Act, 1961

Headnote :

According to Sections 132 and 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a reassessment can be challenged on the basis that the Assessing Officer did not have jurisdiction due to the absence of a Notice. If the Assessing Officer, in rejecting a return filed under Section 158 BC(a), conducts an inquiry, he...

Read full Judgement

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai v. M/s. S.G. Asia Holdings (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 716 SC

Income Tax Act, 1961

Headnote :

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Ashok Kumar v. Depinder Singh Dhesi

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 717 SC

J.S. Parihar Vs. Ganpat Duggar & Ors [1996] INSC 1118 (11 September 1996)

Headnote :

Service Issue.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Assam Public Works v. Union of India

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 718 SC

Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003
Citizenship Act, 1955

Headnote :

The Citizenship Act of 1955, Section 3 (1)(a), along with the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, specifically Rule 4A.

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Laxman Das Khandelwal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 719 SC

Gwalior
Income Tax Act, 1961

Headnote :

Read full Judgement

Madhukar Nivrutti Jagtap v. Smt. Pramilabai Chandulal Parandekar

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 720 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Indian Contract Act, 1872
Specific Relief Act, 1963
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Sarvinder Singh Vs. Dalip Singh & Ors [1996] INSC 885 (2 August 1996)

Headnote :

Specific Relief Act of 1963 - Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Kum C. Yamini v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 721 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

According to Rule 9 of the A.P. State Judicial Service Rules, 2007, seniority is determined from the date of initial appointment as an ad hoc District Judge. It was determined that the claim for seniority is influenced by various factors, including the nature of the appointment, the rules governing...

Read full Judgement

Vinod Singh Negi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 722 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302 and 34 - Murder - Bail pending appeals - The High Court did not provide justification for granting bail - The complainant and the State have submitted new evidence against the accused for the first time in the appeals, revealing the criminal history of the accuse...

Read full Judgement

Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner EPFO, Bareilly v. M/s U.P. State Warehousing Corp.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 723 SC

Apprentices Act, 1961
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act of 1952, specifically Sections 2F and 7A, addresses the determination of funds owed by employers. The question arises whether workers engaged in loading and unloading activities in warehouses are entitled to benefits under this Act. If t...

Read full Judgement

State of Rajasthan v. Shiv Dayal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 724 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

Mining Operations - Permanent Injunction against the State - Dismissal of the second appeal due to the absence of a substantial question of law in the appeals - It was determined that if one or more grounds are established in a suitable case based on the pleadings and evidence, such grounds will qua...

Read full Judgement

State of Jharkhand v. Gopal Prasad Mandal

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 725 SC

Headnote :

Appeal - Road construction - Contempt petition - Dismissal of objections - The purpose of the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was to guarantee the timely construction of the associated road, which has been completed, albeit at a different location due to an agreement among the villagers. The road w...

Read full Judgement

Udiya v. State of Madhya Pradesh

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 726 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, pertains to the murder of a brother in a case involving a sudden altercation between two siblings. During the struggle, the accused picked up a stone and struck the deceased. According to the eyewitness, the deceased\'s wife, she arrived at their home and re...

Read full Judgement

Seema Sapra v. Court On Its Own Motion

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 727 SC

Constitution of India
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

Medha Kotwal Lele and Others Vs. Union of India and Others [October 19, 2012]

Headnote :

Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.[Paragraph]

Read full Judgement

Joginder Singh v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 728 SC

Reshma Kumari and Ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and ANR. [APRIL 2, 2013]

Headnote :

A. Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, regarding death in an accident, the multiplier for calculating compensation must be based on the age of the deceased. In this case, the deceased was 20 years old, so a multiplier of 18 is applicable instead of 11.[Para 4]B. In accordance with Sec...

Read full Judgement

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Kanshi Ram

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 729 SC

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Headnote :

The Land Acquisition Act of 1894 pertains to the acquisition of land for road construction. The court ruled that the compensation and interest on the total compensation should not be based on the market value due to a lack of documentary evidence. Additionally, the State alleged that a sale deed fro...

Read full Judgement

Kanwaljit Singh v. National Insurance Company Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 730 SC

Headnote :

Family Mediclaim Policy - Entitlement to 50% of the sum insured under an individual Mediclaim Policy - During the term of the Family Mediclaim Policy, the appellant\'s son became ill and required treatment at the Post Graduate Institute. It was determined that the total medical expenses or claims fo...

Read full Judgement

P.T. Sreenarayanan Unni & Ors. vs. State of Kerala & Ors.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 731 SC

Gwalior

Headnote :

The Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act of 1971, Section 3, pertains to private forest land and its transfer to the State Government. The land in question falls under the definition of private forest as outlined in the Act. Consequently, these private forests were automatically transferred t...

Read full Judgement

Smt. Sunita Tokas vs. New India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 732 SC

Headnote :

A. Under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, when determining the multiplier, the age of the deceased is the primary consideration, not the ages of the dependents, which may differ. In this case, since the deceased was 21 years old, a multiplier of 18 is applicable.[Paras 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 4.7...

Read full Judgement

Saleem Ahmed vs. State & Anr.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 733 SC

CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

Headnote :

The Electricity Act of 2003, specifically Sections 135 and 152, addresses the issue of electricity theft. In this case, the FIR filed by the Enforcement Department officials of BSES against the appellant was quashed after the dispute was resolved in Lok Adalat. The appellant had made a full and fina...

Read full Judgement

ALPANA GUPTA vs. APG TOWERS PVT. LTD

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 734 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

Under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, an application for the rejection of a plaint was made. The defenses raised by the defendants in this application do not correspond to any of the clauses outlined in Order 7, Rule 11. These defenses should have been presented by the defendants...

Read full Judgement

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Others vs. Pramod V. Sawant And Another

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 735 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1981

Headnote :

Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 addresses the issue of taking cognizance against Public Sector Corporations. It states that employees of Public Sector Corporations do not qualify for the protection of sanction as public servants.[Para 15]

Read full Judgement

GURUVIAH vs. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 736 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Headnote :

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, specifically Sections 13(1)(d), 13(2), 12, and 20, addresses illegal gratification and presumption. The complainant sought to transfer an electric connection for the land in question into his name to qualify for a subsidy of Rs. 625 every six months. The villa...

Read full Judgement

SHAKEENA vs. BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 737 SC

Constitution of India
Income Tax Act, 1961
Registration Act, 1908
Registration Act, 1908
Registration Act, 1908
Section 60. TPA, Right of mortgagor to redeem.
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Headnote :

A. The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Sections 13(4) and 17. Change in the rights of parties - Availability of argument - Debtors requested the annulment of the bank\'s auction sale on th...

Read full Judgement

ABDULLAKOYA HAJI vs. RUBIS THARAYIL

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 738 SC

Headnote :

The Specific Relief Act of 1963, Section 16(c), addresses the specific performance of a sales agreement, focusing on the concepts of readiness and willingness. In this case, the plaintiffs filed a suit seeking the enforcement of an agreement with the defendants. The value of the land was calculated...

Read full Judgement

MUSTAFA vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 739 SC

Bihar Special Courts Act, 2009
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973
Delhi Excise Act, 2009
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 420. Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property
Orissa Special Courts Act, 2006
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
United Provinces Excise Act, 1910
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972

K. Satwant Singh Vs. The State of Punjab [1959] INSC 127 (28 October 1959)

Headnote :

A. Under Sections 60 and 72(2) of the United Provinces Excise Act, 1910, the Collector has the authority to order the confiscation of any item or animal, regardless of whether a prosecution for the offense has been initiated. This means that the Collector\'s power to confiscate seized items or anima...

Read full Judgement

TILAK RAJ BAKSHI vs. AVINASH CHAND SHARMA(DEAD) THROUGH LRS.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 740 SC

Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India
Indian Contract Act, 1872
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Partition Act, 1893
Specific Relief Act, 1963
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Headnote :

A. According to Section 29 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Section 93 of the Evidence Act, 1872, a contract may be deemed void if it is found to be vague and unenforceable, regardless of whether a plea has been raised regarding its validity. The court is permitted to examine the contract\'s ter...

Read full Judgement

M/S NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) vs. STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 741 SC

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India
General Clauses Act, 1897
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Limitation Act, 1963
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972

Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. & Ors [2006] Insc 286 (5 May 2006)

Headnote :

A. Under the Wild Life (Protection) Act of 1972, Section 24, and the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act of 1959, Section 34, there is a provision for exclusion from acquisition and claims for damages. The plaintiff had leased the land in question from the Mutt for a period of 2...

Read full Judgement

ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL SUPER SPECIALITY ASPIRANTS AND RESIDENTS vs. UNION OF INDIA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 742 SC

Constitution of India
Indian Contract Act, 1872
Specific Relief Act, 1963

State of Punjab & Ors Vs. Ram Lubhaya Bagga [1998] INSC 131 (26 February 1998)
Vincent Panikurlangara Vs. Union of India & Ors [1987] INSC 68 (3 March 1987)

Headnote :

A. According to Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950, regarding postgraduate medical and super-specialty courses, the imposition of compulsory bond conditions requiring a certain period of service at the time of admission falls under the jurisdiction of the State Government. It is acknowled...

Read full Judgement

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs. M/S. TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ETC.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 743 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976

Headnote :

Section 169 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, and Section 17 of the Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, 1950.

Read full Judgement

Hena Parween vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 744 SC

Headnote :

The Constitution of India, 1950, Article 136 outlines the conditions for granting anticipatory bail. The petitioner expressed concern over a condition that limits her mobile phone usage. When asked why she consented to this condition, it was argued that no actual consent was provided. The petitioner...

Read full Judgement

P. S. MALIK vs. HIGH COURT OF DELHI

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 745 SC

Constitution of India
Delhi Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1970
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Sher Singh & Ors Vs. The State of Punjab [1983] INSC 27 (24 March 1983)

Headnote :

A. According to Rule 8 of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1969 and Sections 4 and 11(4) of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013, regarding allegations of sexual harassment and disciplinary proceedings, the petitioner claim...

Read full Judgement

AJITH K. vs. ANEESH K.S.

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 746 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The Kerala Municipal Common Rules of 1967, Section 11, and the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules of 1958, Rule 10(a)(ii), pertain to the qualifications for the municipal common service. A notification was issued for various posts, followed by a common written test, and a list of selected c...

Read full Judgement

JAYANTIBHAI vs. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL NARKHED

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 747 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

Unlawful termination - Reinstatement without back pay - Denying back wages to an employee who has been harmed by the employer\'s illegal actions effectively punishes the employee while benefiting the employer by relieving them of the responsibility to pay back wages and other benefits. The allegatio...

Read full Judgement

PRAMOD SURYABHAN PAWAR vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 748 SC

CrPC Section 482. Saving of inherent power of High Court
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 375. Rape
IPC Section 376. Punishment for rape
IPC Section 90. Consent known to be given under fear or misconception

Deepak Gulati Vs. State of Haryana [May 20, 2013]
Kaini Rajan Vs. State of Kerala [September 19, 2013]
Uday Vs. State of Karnataka [2003] INSC 106 (19 February 2003)
Uday Vs. State of Karnataka [2003] INSC 108 (19 February 2003)

Headnote :

A. Under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and Sections 376, 417, 504, and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the issue of sexual relations based on a false promise of marriage is addressed. The quashing of the FIR indicates that a woman\'s \"consent\" in relation to Section 375...

Read full Judgement

M/S.SHREE DANESHWARI TRADERS vs. SANJAY JAIN

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 749 SC

NI Act, Section 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the accounts
NI Act, Section 139. Presumption in favour of holder

Headnote :

The Negotiable Instruments Act of 1881, specifically Sections 138 and 139, addresses the dishonor of cheques and the subsequent acquittal of the accused. According to Section 139, once a cheque is issued by the drawer, a presumption arises that it falls under the provisions of Section 138. This sect...

Read full Judgement

RAMESHWAR vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 750 SC

Gwalior
M.P. Dakaiti Aur Vyapharan Prabhavit Kshetra Adhiniyam, 1981

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, Section 302 in conjunction with Section 34, pertains to murder and common intention. The conviction of the accused who fired the gunshot can be upheld with the support of Section 34 of the IPC. The presence of the co-accused has been corroborated by consistent eyewitne...

Read full Judgement