Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 11283 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11283 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 September, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 763/2022

Dinesh
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Ram Singh Rawal
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

09/09/2022

     The application (inward no.02/2022) for early hearing of the

matter is disposed of.

     Admit.

     Issue notice to the respondent no.2 only, as learned Public

Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent -State.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.478/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellant has shown from the

judgment the statement recorded by the prosecutrix under

Section 161 Cr.P.C., which has been dealt with by the learned

court below, in which, it is stated that she went from the home to

school on legs and from Dagar Bas Stand, she went to Ahmedabad

and at Ahmedabad, she called the present petitioner-Dinesh, who

wanted to marry her. They stayed as husband and wife for about

two years in a room and during lockdown period also, they stayed

there and she worked in the bungalows. She further deposed that

she wanted to remain with the present petitioner. It is also

                    (Downloaded on 12/09/2022 at 09:05:00 PM)
                                        (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-763/2022]


contended that in 164 statement also, she has reiterated the same

story.

     Learned    Public   Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly,   S.B.     Suspension            of    Sentence      (Appeal)

No.478/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 16.05.2022 in Sessions Case No.26/2021

(CIS NO.26/2021) against appellant- Dinesh S/o Shri Kishore

Meena shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid

appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of

Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

Court on 12.10.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.
     2.    That if the appellant changes the place of
           residence, they will give in writing his changed
           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
           in the High Court.
     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
           they will give in writing their changed address to
           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall



                    (Downloaded on 12/09/2022 at 09:05:00 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-763/2022]



                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

                                   trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

47-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter