Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakesh Kumar Jhalani Son Of Shri ... vs Income Tax Officer
2022 Latest Caselaw 1117 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1117 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Rakesh Kumar Jhalani Son Of Shri ... vs Income Tax Officer on 28 January, 2022
Bench: Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Birendra Kumar
                                                HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                            BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                                       D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1349/2022

                                   Rakesh Kumar Jhalani Son of Shri Shyam Lal, Ashok Vihar, Chomu,
                                   Jaipur, Rajasthan.

                                                                                                        ----Petitioner

                                                                          Versus

                                   Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1), Jaipur Having Its Address At Office of
                                   The Income Tax Officer, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan.

                                                                                                      ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate through VC

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Judgment / Order

28/01/2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for

the revenue at the outset would submit that the issue involved in this

petition is no longer res integra as it has been put to an end by Division

Bench of this Court in the decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh

Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition

No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) where the notices issued under

Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid

and impermissible in law and quashed.

In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for both

the parties, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for the

reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid

cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J

Mohita /32

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter