Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1117 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1349/2022
Rakesh Kumar Jhalani Son of Shri Shyam Lal, Ashok Vihar, Chomu,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(1), Jaipur Having Its Address At Office of
The Income Tax Officer, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Advocate through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR Judgment / Order
28/01/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for
the revenue at the outset would submit that the issue involved in this
petition is no longer res integra as it has been put to an end by Division
Bench of this Court in the decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh
Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition
No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) where the notices issued under
Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid
and impermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for both
the parties, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for the
reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaid
cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Mohita /32
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!