Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4011 MP
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2022
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
MCRC No.14434/2022
Vankat vs. State of M.P.
Gwalior, Dated : 23/03/2022
Shri M.S. Rawat, Counsel for the applicant.
Shri A.K. Nirankari, Counsel for the respondent/State.
Case Diary is available.
This second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been
filed for grant of bail. The first application was dismissed as
withdrawn by order dated 8.2.2022 passed in M.Cr.C.No.6798/2022.
The applicant has been arrested on 13.11.2021 in connection
with Crime No.284/2021 registered by Police Station Kumbhraj,
District Guna for offence punishable under Sections 307, 294, 506B,
149 of IPC and under Section 25/27 of the Arms Act.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that according to
the prosecution case, on 7.11.2021 at about 7:30 PM, the co-accused
Mantilal, Harbhajan, Pawan and applicant were abusing the
complainant as a result the complainant went inside his house and the
accused persons continued to abuse from outside of his house and
were also extending a threat that he should come out and he will not
be spared. Thereafter, at about 8:30 when the complainant came out of
the house and requested not to abuse him, then all the four persons
started abusing with instigated that he should be killed and,
accordingly, the co-accused Banti and Pawan fired gunshot causing
injuries to the complainant. It is submitted that the only allegation
against the applicant is that he came along with the co-accused
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.14434/2022 Vankat vs. State of M.P.
persons and was abusing the complainant. However, there is nothing
on record to suggest that either the applicant was armed with firearm
or he fired any gunshot. The applicant is in jail from 13.11.2021. The
trial is likely to take sufficiently long time and there is no possibility
of his absconding or tampering with the prosecution case. It is also
submitted that this Court by order dated 21.1.2022 passed in
M.Cr.C.No.3475/2022 has granted bail to Satyabhan @ Nikhil but
fairly conceded that the case of the applicant is slightly
distinguishable from the case of co-accused Satyabhan @ Nikhil. It is
submitted that neither Satyabhan @ Nikhil had fired any gunshot nor
the applicant had fired any gunshot.
Per contra, the application is vehemently opposed by the
counsel for the respondent/State. After going through the police case
diary, it was submitted by the counsel for the State that the case diary
does not contain any criminal antecedents of the applicant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of
detention and without commenting on the merits of the case, the
application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on
bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-
(Rupees One Lac Only) with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the Trial Court/Committal Court to appear before the
Court on the dates given by the concerned Court.
This order shall remain effective till the end of trial but in case
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC No.14434/2022 Vankat vs. State of M.P.
of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
In the light of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the
case of Aparna Bhat and others Vs. State of M.P. Passed on
18.03.2021 in Criminal Appeal No. 329/2021, the intimation
regarding grant of bail be sent to the complainant.
Certified copy as per rules.
(G.S. Ahluwalia) Judge (alok)
ALOK KUMAR 2022.03.23 18:00:49 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!