Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rakesh Bhushan Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh
2022 Latest Caselaw 3972 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3972 MP
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Rakesh Bhushan Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 March, 2022
Author: Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari
                                                                   1
                                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
                                                                   BEFORE
                                            HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
                                                           ON THE 23rd OF MARCH, 2022

                                                       WRIT PETITION No. 21128 of 2017

                                           Between:-
                                           RAKESH BHUSHAN SHARMA S/O HEERALAL
                                           SHARMA , AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
                                           SERVICE WORKING AS ASSISTANT GRADE III IN
                                           THE OFFICE OF REGIOANL ACCOUNTS OFFICER
                                           (T.H. C) M P POWER GENERATING CO. LTD
                                           SIRMOUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                           .....PETITIONER
                                           (BY SHRI RAJNISH GUPTA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE
                                           PETITIONER )

                                           AND

                                    1.     THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROGUH
                                           PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ENERGY DEPARTMENT
                                           GOVT. OF M P VALLABH BHWAN, (MADHYA
                                           PRADESH)

                                    2.     SECRETARY STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD SHAKTI
                                           BHAWAN    RAMPUR    JABALPUR    (MADHYA
                                           PRADESH)

                                    3.     CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR POWER
                                           GENERATION CO. LTD. BLOCK NO. 6 SHAKTI
                                           BHAWAN   RAMPUR    JABALPUR  (MADHYA
                                           PRADESH)

                                    4.     CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR POORVA
                                           KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD. SHAKTI
                                           BHAWAN   RAMPUR   JABALPUR   (MADHYA
                                           PRADESH)

                                    5.     EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (HUMAN RESOURCES AND
                                           ADMINISTRATION) POWER GENERATION CO.
                                           LTD . BLOCK NO. 6 SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAMPUR
                                           (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                    6.     CHIEF ENGINEER (GEN.) POWER GENERATION
                                           CO. LTD. BIRSINGHPUR DISTT. UMARIA (MADHYA
                                           PRADESH)

                                    7.     EXECUTIVE ENGINEER    (HEAD  QUAQRTER)
                                           OFFICE   OF  CHIEF   ENGINEER   POWER
                                           GENERATION CO. LTD. BIRSINGHPUR DISTT.
                                           UMARIA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                    8.     EXECUTIVE    ENGINEER/ADDITIONAL    CHIEF
                                           ENGINEER (THC) MP POWER GENERATION CO.
Signature Not Verified                     LTD. SIRMOUR DISTT. REWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
  SAN




Digitally signed by TRUPTI GUNJAL
Date: 2022.03.24 17:00:47 IST
                                                                                         .....RESPONDENTS
                                           (BY SHRI AMIT PANDEY, LEARNED PANEL LAWYER, FOR THE
                                                                    2
                                             RESPONDENTS/STATE &
                                             MS. RITIKA CHAUHAN, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT
                                             NOS.3 AND 5 TO 8)

                                           Th is petition coming on for admission. this day, the court passed the
                                    following:
                                                                           ORDER

Heard finally with the consent of both the parties. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the challenge has been made to the orders dated 28.11.2013 (Annexure P-1), 11.12.2013 (Annexure P-2), 26.12.2013 (Annexure P-3) and 24.6.2017 (Annexure P-4); whereby the respondents malafidely retired the petitioner prematurely on attaining the age of 58 years; whereas the actual age of retirement of petitioner would be effecting after attaining the age of 60 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents invited options whether the employee concerned desires to remain in service till attaining the age of 60 years and the cut-off date to submit the same was 17.5.2012, but the option form could not be submitted within 30 days, therefore, the claim of the petitioner was rejected.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the issue involved in the present petition was subject-matter of Writ Appeal No.801/2016. Vide order dated 13.7.2017 the writ appeal was finally decided and the orders passed by the learned Single Judge were set aside. It was held that the petitioners, therein, would be entitled to continue upto the age of 60 years and they shall be allowed to pay the allowances for the intervening period.

Being aggrieved, the respondents preferred SLP No.25918/2017, which also came to be dismissed vide order dated 18.12.2020. In view of the aforesaid, the order passed in Writ Appeal No.801/2016 has attained finality.

The present petition, accordingly, stands allowed and disposed of on the same terms as contained in order dated 13.07.2017 delivered in W.A. No.801/2016. The directions contained therein shall apply mutatis mutandis to this petition with full force.

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by TRUPTI GUNJAL Date: 2022.03.24 17:00:47 IST However, the petitioner would also be entitled to pay the allowances for the

intervening period, which shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

Parties to act accordingly.

A copy of judgment delivered in W.A. No.801/2016 be placed in the record of this petition.

(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI) JUDGE TG /-

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by TRUPTI GUNJAL Date: 2022.03.24 17:00:47 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter