Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamlesh Patel vs Ramakant Patael
2022 Latest Caselaw 17010 MP

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17010 MP
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Kamlesh Patel vs Ramakant Patael on 21 December, 2022
Author: Vivek Agarwal
                                                                  1
                                        IN    THE    HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                                          AT JABALPUR
                                                                BEFORE
                                                  HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
                                                      ON THE 21 st OF DECEMBER, 2022
                                                        MISC. APPEAL No. 691 of 2021

                                       BETWEEN:-
                                       KAMLESH PATEL S/O SHRI RAMKHELAWAN PATEL,
                                       AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TRUCK OWNER
                                       AND DRIVER VILLAGE NEW MIRGAUATI PS. AND TEH.
                                       RAMNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                            .....APPELLANT
                                       (BY SHRI DINESH PRASAD PATEL, ADVOCATE)

                                       AND
                                       1.    RAMAKANT PATAEL S/O JAGDEESH PRASAD
                                             PATEL, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, VILLAGE
                                             BHITARI P.S. RAMNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       2.    DHARMENDRA TIWARI S/O PARSANGI RAM
                                             TIWARI OCCUPATION: NOT MENTION R/O
                                             VILLAGE GORSARI, P.S. RAMNAGAR DISTT.
                                             SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       3.    GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. MAGMA HOUSE
                                             24 PARK STREET KOLKATA (WEST BENGAL)

                                                                                       .....RESPONDENTS
                                       (BY SHRI RAGHUWANSH PRASAD MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR
                                       RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2)
                                       (BY SHRI T.S. LAMBA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3)


                                                       MISC. APPEAL No. 4890 of 2019

                                       BETWEEN:-
                                       MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. THR.
Signature Not Verified
  SAN                                  MAGMA HOUSE 24 PARK STREET KOLKATA OFFICE AT
                                       MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. THIRD
Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN
Date: 2022.12.22 13:43:06 IST
                                       FLOOR PLOT NO.93 SCHEME NO.47 ABOVE STATE
                                       BANK OF INDIA SAPNA SANGEETA ROAD INDORE
                                                                           2
                                       (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                       .....APPELLANT
                                       (BY SHRI T.S. LAMBA, ADVOCATE FOR THE INSURANCE COMPANY)

                                       AND
                                       1.    KAMLESH PATEL S/O RAMKHILAWAN PATEL,
                                             AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NEW GIRGOTI POLICE
                                             STATION  TAHSIL   RAMNAGAR    (MADHYA
                                             PRADESH)

                                       2.    RAMAKANT PATEL S/O JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL,
                                             AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, VILLAGE BHITARI P.S
                                             RAMNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                       3.    DHARMENDRA TIWARI S/O PARSANGI RAM
                                             TI WA R I VILLAGE GORSARI P.S RAMNAGAR
                                             (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                                    .....RESPONDENTS
                                       (BY SHRI DINESH PRASAD PATEL, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)
                                       (BY SHRI RAGHUWANSH PRASAD MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR
                                       RESPONDENTS NO.2 AND 3)

                                             These appeals coming on for admission this day, the court passed the
                                       following:
                                                                           ORDER

Heard on I.A. No.1777/2021, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay. As per office report, there is delay of 90 days in filing the appeal in the light of the Supreme Court Judgment dated 23.03.2020.

For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, I.A. No.1777/2021 is allowed and delay of 90 days is hereby condoned.

These appeals are filed by the claimant and Insurance Company Signature Not Verified SAN respectively being aggrieved of award dated 22.06.2019 passed by learned 2nd Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2022.12.22 13:43:06 IST Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Maihar, District Satna in Motor

Accident Claim Case No.100003/2015 whereby learned Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.3,66,525/-.

Plea of the insurance company in their appeal is that accident took place on 01.02.2014, FIR was lodged on 04.02.2014 against unknown Sonalika New Tractor bearing registration No.M.P.19-AB 7541, Tractor was seized on 24.02.2014.

It is submitted that it is a case of false implication. On the other hand, Shri Dinesh Prasad Patel, learned counsel for the applicant submits that meager amounts have been awarded, overlooking the aspect of 50% permanent disability on the ground that Dr.R.N. Soni s/o Shri Ramniranjan Soni, Medical Specialist District Hospital Satna was examined, who expressed post head injury hemiparesis left as a reason for 50% permanent disability.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, it is evident that insurance company has placed lot of reliance on the witness of the criminal case who was examined before the Tribunal namely Shri Ravikant Vishwakarma, who denied the factum of accident whereas accident was proved by Shri Kamlesh Patel, claimant and there is no evidence of the owner driver of the tractor to deny the factum of accident, therefore, in my opinion insurance company failed to prove the aspect of false implication and

thus their appeal deserves to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed.

As far as, appeal filed by the claimant is concerned, contrary to the evidence given by Dr.R.N. Soni, claimant himself has admitted in para 10 of his cross-examination that he is fully recovered and has come to court in a healthy Signature Not Verified SAN

state he has not produced any document to show that his brain is not Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2022.12.22 13:43:06 IST

functioning well, he has not produced any document that he cannot carry out

any vocation requiring hard work.

Taking these facts into consideration, it is evident that evidence of the injured witness Kamlesh Patel is contrary to the medical certificate Ex.P-10 as is mentioned in para 10 of his cross-examination, therefore, no amount is required to be awarded under the head of permanent disability.

Therefore, in view of such facts, non award or any amount under the head of permanent disability cannot be said to be are illegal or arbitrary, on the other heads, award appears to be just and correct except that only a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) is awarded under the head of mental agony and pain which needs to be enhanced to Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only).

Similarly, looking to the fact that accident took place on 01.02.2014, award of compensation under the head of attendant, nutritious diet and transport @ of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand Only) needs to be enhanced to Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only). Thus, there will be addition of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) to which claimant will be entitled to. This additional amount will also earn interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment. Other terms and condition of the award shall remain intact.

However, there is actual delay of about 1 year 5 months, therefore, claimant is not entitled for any interest for that period.

In above terms, both the appeals are disposed of. Record of the Tribunal be sent back.

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2022.12.22 13:43:06 IST

(VIVEK AGARWAL)

JUDGE Tabish

Signature Not Verified SAN

Digitally signed by MOHD TABISH KHAN Date: 2022.12.22 13:43:06 IST

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter