Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Vinay Ganapati Achari
2024 Latest Caselaw 15119 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15119 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd vs Vinay Ganapati Achari on 1 July, 2024

                                               -1-
                                                     NC: 2024:KHC-D:8949
                                                      MFA No. 101107 of 2014
                                                  C/W MFA No. 102081 of 2024



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                       DHARWAD BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                          BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T

                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101107/2014(MV-I)
                                        C/W
                      MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102081/2024

                   IN MFA NO.101107/2014 :

                   BETWEEN:

                   SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
                   10003-E-8, RIICO, INDUSTRIAL AREA, SITAPURA-JAIPUR,
                   RAJASTHAN-302022, NOW REPRESENTED BY
                   ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY,
                   SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
                   LEGAL CELL, E-8, EPIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAL AREA,
                   SITAPURA, JAIPUR-302022, RAJASTHAN STATE.
                                                                     ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI S. K.KAYAKAMATH, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed
by MANJANNA E      1.   SHRI. VINAY GANAPATI ACHARI,
Location: HIGH          AGED ABOUT: 30 YEARS, OCC: CARPENTER,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA               R/O: KODASANI, TQ: ANKOLA, DIST: KARWAR.

                   2.  MR. CRISTY S/O. P. J. VERGHESE,
                       AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF LORRY
                       BEARING NO. KA-20/4960,
                       R/O. MASTIKATTE, TQ: HOSANAGAR,
                       DIST: SHIMOGA.
                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. S. V. YAJI, ADV. FOR R1;
                        NOTICE TO R2 SERVED)

                        THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR
                   VEHICLES ACT 1988, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS, HEAR THE
                   PARTIES, AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR BY SETTING
                   ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10.01.2014
                                  -2-
                                       NC: 2024:KHC-D:8949
                                       MFA No. 101107 of 2014
                                   C/W MFA No. 102081 of 2024



PASSED BY THE ADDL. MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,
KUMTA, ITINERARY SITTING AT ANKOLA, IN MVC NO.30/2011, WITH
COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

IN MFA NO.102081/2024

BETWEEN:

VINAY GANAPATI ACHARI,
AGE: 40 YEARS,
OCC: CARPENTER, (NOW NIL),
R/O. KODASANI, TQ. ANKOLA,
DIST: KARWAR-581357.
                                                   ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S. V. YAJI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    CRISTY S/O. P. J. VERGHESE,
      AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
      R/O. MASTI KATTE, TQ. HOSA NAGAR,
      DIST. SHIMOGA, PIN-577448.

2.    SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
      10003-E-8, RICCO,
      INDUSTRIAL AREA SITAPURA,
      JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN-302022.

                                                ...RESPONDENTS
(BY    SRI. S. K. KAYAKAMATH, ADV. FOR R2;
       NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173 (1) OF MOTOR
VEHICLES ACT, 1988, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND
MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL
MACT KUMTA ITINERARY SITTING AT ANKOLA IN MVC NO.30/2011
DATED 10/01/2014 BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED
IN THE APPEAL BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL CONSIDERING THE FACT
AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS THE
COURT DEEMS FIT CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES
OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.


     THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                      -3-
                                              NC: 2024:KHC-D:8949
                                            MFA No. 101107 of 2014
                                        C/W MFA No. 102081 of 2024



                             JUDGMENT

MFA.No.101107/2014 is filed by the Insurance Company

questioning the quantum of compensation and

MFA.No.102081/2024 is filed by the claimant for

enhancement of compensation awarded by the Additional

MACT, Kumta itinerary sitting at Ankola ("the Tribunal" for

short) by judgment and award dated 10.01.2014 in MVC

No.30/2011.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are

referred to as they are referred to in the claim petition

before the Tribunal.

3. After hearing the matters for some time, Sri

S.V.Yaji, learned counsel for respondent No.1-claimant in

MFA.No.101107/2024 has filed two applications under Order

XLI Rule 27 of CPC, one of them in I.A.No.1/2017 for

producing certain documents i.e., Medical bills, Cash

Receipts and Discharge Summary issued in respect of

claimant and another I.A.No.1/2024 for production of

additional documents i.e., Medical Receipts, Discharge

Summary, certificate and photographs of the claimant.

Hence, learned counsel prayed to allow both the applications

NC: 2024:KHC-D:8949

and to remand the matter for fresh consideration to the

Tribunal.

4. Sri S.K.Kayakamath, learned counsel for the

Insurance Company concedes to allow the applications and

to remand the matter to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.

5. Heard learned counsel for the Insurance Company

and learned counsel for the claimant on applications and

perused the affidavits filed in support of the applications.

6. If applications in I.A.No.1/2017 and

I.A.No.1/2024 filed in MFA.No.101107/2014 for production of

certain documents are not allowed and medical bills,

receipts, discharge summary, prescriptions and photographs

issued by the doctor are not accepted and marked in

evidence, more injustice would be caused to the claimant. If

the matter is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh

consideration, no harm would be caused to Insurance

Company.

7. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the

affidavits filed in support of the applications and in view of

the submission of learned counsel for both the parties,

I.A.No.1/2017 and I.A.No.1/2024 are allowed. The claimant

NC: 2024:KHC-D:8949

is permitted to produce the documents as sought for under

both the applications.

8. Hence, the judgment and award dated

10.01.2014 passed in MVC.No.30/2011 is set aside and the

matter is remanded to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.

9. Both the parties are directed to appear before the

Tribunal on 05.08.2024 without waiting for any notice from

the Tribunal.

10. The amount in deposit before this Court be

transmitted to the Tribunal.

11. The Tribunal is directed to keep the entire

deposited amount in any nationalized Bank for a period of

one year renewal by every year.

12. Keeping the age of litigation, the Tribunal is

directed to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as

possible.

All the contentions are left open.

Sd/-

JUDGE EM/ct-an

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter