Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 85 j&K
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022
Sr. No. 37
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 222/2018
IA No. 1/2018
Kewal Krishan & Ors ....Petitioner (s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Rohit Kansal and Others ....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. K. D. S. Kotwal, Dy.AG.
Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
04.02.2022
In this petition the petitioners are seeking initiation of contempt
proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-
compliance of order dated 05.10.2017 passed in SWP No. 2441/2017, whereby a
direction was issued to the respondents to accord consideration and take
appropriate decision under rules on the representation stated to have been filed
by the petitioners.
The matter came up for consideration on 17.11.2021 when this Court
took note of the plea raised in the statement of facts by the respondents that the
issue with regard to grant of benefit under SRO 149 of 1973 cannot be
considered in view of pendency of SLP No. 2952/2019 pending before Hon'ble
the Supreme Court, wherein the judgment of the Division Bench has been stayed
and directed the respondents to file compliance with regard to other aspects
highlighted in the representation.
2 CPSW 222/2018
Respondents have filed their compliance on 28.01.2022 and have
taken the plea that the other aspects highlighted by the petitioners in their
representation, i.e. promotion and regularization, cannot be considered by the
Estates Department for the reason that pursuant to decision of the Administrative
Council read with Government Order No. 752-JK(GAD) of 2020 dated
10.08.2020 the Engineering Wing ( Technical and Non-Technical) along with 88
posts on the establishment of the Estates Department, have been transferred/
merged with the cadre of the Public Works Department. The respondents have
placed the relevant orders on record as Annexure R-1 and R-2. It is thus
submitted by the respondents that it is now for the Public Works Department to
take any decision in the matter.
In view of the compliance report filed by the Deputy Director Estates
Department, I see no reason to initiate any contempt proceedings against the
respondents. The contempt proceedings are, accordingly closed. It shall,
however, be open for the petitioners to make a representation to the Public
Works Department for consideration and file contempt petition also if required,
after the SLP aforementioned is finally disposed of by Hon"ble the Supreme
Court.
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Jammu:
04.02.2022 Sahil T
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!