Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vipulbhai Premjibhai Dhandhukiya ... vs State Of Gujarat
2026 Latest Caselaw 1787 Guj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1787 Guj
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Vipulbhai Premjibhai Dhandhukiya ... vs State Of Gujarat on 30 March, 2026

                                                                                                      NEUTRAL CITATION




                            R/CR.MA/2262/2026                            ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

                                                                                                       undefined




                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                             R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                                         CHARGESHEET) NO. 2262 of 2026

                       ==========================================================
                            VIPULBHAI PREMJIBHAI DHANDHUKIYA (VIPULBHAI PREMJIBHAI
                                         DHANDHUKIYA JATE KOLI) & ANR.
                                                    Versus
                                              STATE OF GUJARAT
                       ==========================================================
                       Appearance:
                       MR. IRAFAN H SAIYED(18593) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                       MR.MALAV MULANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                       ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
                               DESAI

                                                     Date : 30/03/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER

1. Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicants and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.

3. The applicants have filed this application under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,

2023 for enlarging the applicants on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11189004252224 of

2025 registered with 'B' Division Morbi City Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

Station, Morbi, for the offence punishable under Sections

65-A, 65(e), 116-B and 98(2) of Gujarat Prohibition

(Amendment) Ordinance, 2016, Section 341(4) of BNS

and Section 192 and 39 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

4. Learned advocate for the applicants would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicants,

and nature of the allegation levelled, the applicants may

be enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicants will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicants

are ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that

may be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.

Learned advocate upon instructions submits that

applicants will remain within the State of Gujarat during

the trial.

5. As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent - State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicants as

coming out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not

exercise discretion in favour of the applicants and the

application may be dismissed.

6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-

i. Both the applicants are permanent residents of

Morbi, hence, would be available at the time of trial.

ii. The applicant no.1 has one antecedent of like

nature, wherein, he came to be convicted by the CJM of

Morbi, by way of TRC and fine of Rs.200 was imposed,

whereas, there is one antecedent qua applicant no.2

under Sections 323 and 324 of the IPC, wherein, he

came to be acquitted by way of judgement dated

07.01.2022 in CC No.9498 of 2018 by ACJM of Morbi.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

iii. The apprehension of learned APP as regards the

applicants once again indulging into similar activities

can be put to rest by imposing strict conditions.

This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicants in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicants on regular bail.

8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicants are ordered to be released on bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11189004252224 of

2025 registered with 'B' Division Morbi City Police

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

Station, Morbi, on executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-

(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with one local

surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

trial Court and subject to the conditions that they shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within

a week, and if they does not possess a passport, they

shall file an affidavit to that effect;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior

permission of the Sessions Court concerned;

[e] furnish the present addresses of their residences to

the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution

of the bond along with documentary proof and shall

not change their residences without prior intimation to

the I.O. and the court;

[f] mark presence on every Friday before the

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

concerned police station till the trial is over.

[g] not to leave District:Morbi till the trial is over;

[h] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

for which, they shall file an affidavit before the

concerned court and the police station.

9. The Authorities will release the applicants only if

they are not required in connection with any other

offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above

conditions is committed, the Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the competent Court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the

above conditions in accordance with law.

11. At the stage of trial, the competent Court shall not

be influenced by any observations of this Court which are

of preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

purpose of enlarging the applicants on regular bail.

NEUTRAL CITATION

R/CR.MA/2262/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/03/2026

undefined

12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

service is permitted.

(UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J) ANKIT SHAH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter