Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
M/S. North Brook Jute Co. Ltd.& ANR Vs. Their Workmen [1960] INSC 51 (23 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 23 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 51 SC

Headnote :

A rationalization plan at the appellant companies\' mills was approved by the Works Committee, and a notice was issued under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 to the 365 Union representing their workers. However, the workers opposed the implementation of the scheme, leading the Governm...
The Chairman of The Bankura Municipality Vs. Lalji Raja And Sons [1960] INSC 52 (23 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 23 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 52 SC

Headnote :

The respondents were the proprietors of an oil seed pressing factory located within a municipality. They imported mustard seeds from various regions and possessed a license for selling mustard seeds. Following a report from the Sanitary Inspector of the Municipality, the Sub-Divisional Officer issue...
B.N. Elias And Co. Ltd. Employees' Union & Ors Vs. B. N. Elias & Co. Ltd. & Ors [1960] INSC 53 (24 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 24 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 53 SC

Headnote :

Since 1942, the respondents had been providing ex gratia payments to their employees (the appellants) in addition to their regular wages and salaries. However, these payments were not consistent, and in 1956, no ex gratia payments were made at all. The appellants argued that their entitlement to a b...
Bharat Barrel And Drum Mfg. Co.Private Ltd. Vs. Govind Gopal Waghmare & ANR [1960] INSC 54 (24 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 24 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 54 SC

Headnote :

The workers of the appellant company requested four months\' wages, including dearness allowance, as a bonus for the year 1952, along with a retroactive application of the increased wage scale to be determined by the Industrial Tribunal starting from March 1, 1952. The appellant accepted the wage sc...
Management of Kairbetta Estate,Kotagiri Vs. Rajamanickam & Ors [1960] INSC 55 (24 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 24 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Headnote :

The manager of the appellant was brutally assaulted by the workers, resulting in severe injuries.The employees in the lower division also threatened the appellant\'s personnel in that division, stating they would kill them if they continued to work there. Consequently, the appellant had no choice bu...
Kalindi & Ors Vs. Tata Locomotive & Engineering Co. Ltd. [1960] INSC 56 (25 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 25 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Headnote :

A worker who is subject to an inquiry by management does not have the right to be represented by a union representative during that inquiry, although the employer may choose to allow such representation at their discretion. These inquiries typically involve straightforward factual questions regardin...
The State of Bombay Vs. M/S. S. S. Miranda Limited [1960] INSC 57 (25 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 25 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 57 SC

Headnote :

The respondent possessed a trade and import license for foreign liquor, as well as a vendor\'s license under the Bombay Abkari Act. The liquor was stored in a bonded warehouse. On April 2, 1948, the appellant requested the respondent to remove the liquor from the bonded warehouse after paying the re...
R. P. Kapur Vs. The State of Punjab [1960] INSC 58 (25 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 25 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Headnote :

One S filed a first information report against K. After several months without any action on the report, K submitted a criminal complaint against S, claiming that S\'s report was false. At S\'s request, the magistrate postponed K\'s complaint until the police completed their final report on the firs...
M/S. Burn & Co. Ltd. & Ors Vs. Their Employees [1960] INSC 59 (30 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 30 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Headnote :

It is clear from an economic perspective that clerical and subordinate staff, much like manual workers, play a vital role in production. Therefore, there is no justification for completely excluding them from the advantages of an incentive bonus scheme. The fact that clerical employees receive a hig...
Mrs. Kusumben D. Mahadevia Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay [1960] INSC 60 (30 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 30 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a shareholder in a company named Mafatlal Gagalbhai and Co., Ltd., which had its registered office in Bombay and was considered a resident of British India at all relevant times. The company also conducted business in the former Baroda State and retained its profits from that State...
Mis. Swadesamltran Limited, Madras Vs. Their Workmen [1960] INSC 61 (31 March 1960)

Judgement Date : 31 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

The management issued a notice terminating the services of 39 workers as a retrenchment measure. In response, the workers went on strike, resulting in an industrial dispute. The Industrial Tribunal found that the strike was unjustified and that the management had established a necessity for retrench...
Nandlal Misra Vs. K. L. Misra [1960] INSC 62 (1 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 01 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a minor, submitted an application through his mother, acting as his guardian, under section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the City Magistrate\'s Court in Allahabad. He sought a maintenance order against the respondent, whom he claimed was his putative father. The Magistrate...
The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Khushi Ram [1960] INSC 63 (1 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 01 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Headnote :

The respondent faced prosecution for violations under section 7 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The Magistrate determined that the offences were proven and noted that this was the respondent\'s third offence, which made him subject to a minimum imprisonment sentence of two years an...
Assam Oil Company Vs. Its Workmen [1960] INSC 64 (4 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 04 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

One S was hired by the appellant as a secretary, with a term in her employment contract stating that either party could terminate the appointment with one month\'s notice. The appellant was quite unhappy with S\'s performance and disapproved of her decision to join a union. Acting under the terms of...
The Management of Chandramalai estate, Ernakulam Vs. Its Workmen & ANR [1960] INSC 65 (4 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 04 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 65 SC

Headnote :

The management\'s refusal to meet some of the workers\' demands led to the matter being referred for conciliation. However, conciliation efforts were unsuccessful on November 30, 1955. The following day, the union issued a strike notice and commenced the strike on December 9, 1958. On January 3, 195...
The Chartered Bank, Bombay Vs. The Chartered Bank Employees' Union [1960] INSC 66 (4 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 04 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 66 SC

Headnote :

The cash department of the appellant Bank operated with a Chief Cashier overseeing approximately thirty Assistant Cashiers. The Chief Cashier was responsible for securing the cash department\'s operations, while the Assistant Cashiers were hired based on recommendations from the Chief Cashier, who g...
The Standard-Vacuum Refining Co., of India Ltd. Vs. Its Workmen & Ors [1960] INSC 67 (6 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 06 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

A dispute was raised by the respondents, who are the workers of the appellant company, regarding the use of contract labor for cleaning and maintenance tasks at the refinery, including its premises and plant. They demanded the elimination of the contract system and the integration of the contract wo...
In Re: Sant Ram [1960] INSC 68 (7 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 07 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 68 SC

Headnote :

Following a complaint from the Honorary Secretary of the Supreme Court Bar Association, the Registrar of the Supreme Court issued notices to the appellant and another party under Rule 24 of Order IVA of the Supreme Court Rules, requiring them to explain why their names should not be added to the lis...
Muir Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Its Workmen [1960] INSC 69 (7 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 07 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 69 SC

Headnote :

The appellant compensated its workers in the Carding Department on a piece rate basis, and additionally, the workers were eligible for extra payments if their production surpassed a specific standard. The entitlement to these extra payments had become part of the workers\' employment terms. In 1948,...
Madhya Pradesh Mineral Industry Association Vs. The Regional Labour Commissioner Jabalpur & Ors [1960] INSC 70 (7 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 07 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Headnote :

The Government of Madhya Pradesh issued a notification under section 5(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (II of 1948), establishing minimum wage rates for stone breaking and stone crushing activities conducted in mines, based on the authority granted by the President through a notification under Art...
The Mahalaxmi Mills Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay [1960] INSC 71 (8 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 08 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 71 SC

Headnote :

The assessees were conducting business in Bhavnagar, which was previously an Indian State. In 1948, Bhavnagar became part of the United State of Saurashtra, and on March 16, 1949, the Saurashtra Income-tax Ordinance was enacted. To determine the depreciation allowance that the assessees were entitle...
M/S. Muller & Phipps (India) Ltd. Vs. K. C. Sud [1960] INSC 72 (11 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 11 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 72 SC

Headnote :

The Labour Court in Delhi established a gratuity scheme, which stipulates that upon termination of service by the company, employees are entitled to receive half a month\'s basic salary or wage for each completed year of service as gratuity. A respondent who was retrenched and had received compensat...
M/S. Hatisingh Mfg. Co. Ltd. & ANR Vs. Union of India & Ors [1960] INSC 73 (14 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 14 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 73 SC

Headnote :

The issue at hand in these petitions concerns the constitutional validity of Section 25FFF(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which was added by Act 18 of 1957. This section mandates compensation for workers when an industrial establishment is closed. The petitioners argued that this section (...
Darbar Shri Vira Vala Surag Vala,Vadia Vs. The State of Saurashtra (Now Bombay) [1960] INSC 74 (14 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 14 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Headnote :

In the Indian State of Vadia, succession was determined by the principle of primogeniture. In 1943, the Ruler granted his younger son, the petitioner, a village in the State for perpetual and hereditary enjoyment as a \'Kapal-Giras\' under the title of \'Bhayat\'.In 1947, the State of Vadia joined t...
Commissioner of Income- Tax, Bombay Vs. Smt. Indira Balkrishna [1960] INSC 75 (14 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 14 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 75 SC

Headnote :

A Hindu who was governed by the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law passed away, leaving behind three widows as his legal heirs. The widows inherited the estate as joint tenants and chose not to assert their right to separate possession and enjoyment. The primary source of income was from dividends and i...
M/S. Zoraster and Co. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi, Ajmer, Rajasthan A [1960] INSC 76 (17 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 17 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 76 SC

Headnote :

The appellant entered into a contract with the Government for the supply of goods, resulting in an income assessment of Rs. 10,80,653 for the assessment year 1942-43 and Rs. 7,45,336 for the assessment year 1943-44, as determined by the Income-tax Officer. The appellant supplied goods to the Governm...
State of Bombay Vs. K. P. Krishnan & Ors [1960] INSC 77 (18 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 18 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Headnote :

Section 2(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, when properly interpreted, does not independently grant the appropriate Government the authority to make a reference. This authority is actually found in section 10(i) of the Act. In determining whether to make a reference under section 12(5), the a...
Qamar Shaffi Tyabji Vs. The Commissioner, Excess Profits Tax, Hyderabad [1960] INSC 78 (18 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 18 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Headnote :

By an order from the Ruler of the former State of Hyderabad, an institution was established to promote industrial development on behalf of the Government, known as the Industrial Trust Fund, which was overseen by a committee referred to as the Trustees. In 1934, the Trustees entered into agreements...
Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax/Excess Profits Tax, Bombay [1960] INSC 79 (19 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 19 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 79 SC

Headnote :

The appellant served as the managing agent for a company engaged in transporting cargo via boats that docked at ports in British India, the Indian State of Cochin, and other regions.According to the managing agency contract, the appellant\'s remuneration was defined as follows: \"The managing agent...
Bashirbhai Mohamedbhai Vs. The State of Bombay [1960] INSC 80 (19 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 19 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 80 SC

Headnote :

The crime of attempting to cheat can occur even if the individual targeted for cheating does not genuinely believe the false statements made to them and is not deceived by them, but instead pretends to believe in order to catch the perpetrator.If false statements have been made and money has been ac...
Satyadhyan Ghosal & Ors Vs. Sm. Deorajin Debi & ANR [1960] INSC 81 (20 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 20 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 81 SC

Headnote :

The Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act of 1949 was enacted before the appellant-landlords could take possession following their eviction decree against the respondent-tenants. After failing to overturn the decree under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the tenants applied under Section 28 of...
Mahadeolal Kanodia Vs. The Administrator-General of West Bengal [1960] INSC 82 (20 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 20 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 82 SC

Headnote :

To protect Thika tenants from eviction and address certain other issues, the West Bengal Legislature passed the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act in 1949.This Act was later modified by the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Amendment Act of 1953, which removed section 28 from the original Act. The appeal raised the qu...
Rajkumari Kaushalya Devi Vs. Bawa Pritma Singh & ANR [1960] INSC 83 (20 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 20 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 83 SC

Headnote :

The appellant executed two usufructuary mortgages in favor of the respondents in 1946 concerning two properties located in Ferozepur city, and simultaneously leased the properties. The respondents submitted an application under section 13 of the Displaced Persons (Debts Adjustment) Act, LXX of 1951,...
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City, Bombay Vs. Nandlal Gandalal [1960] INSC 84 (21 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 21 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 84 SC

Headnote :

N, a coparcener of the Hindu undivided family of G, which was engaged in business in Kathiwar and later outside British India, formed a partnership with outsiders in Bombay in 1944. An amount of Rs. 1,50,000 was sent to N from the undivided family funds and was used as capital for the partnership bu...
Sahebzada Mohammad Kamgar Shah Vs. Jagdish Chandra Deo Dhabal Deo & Ors [1960] INSC 85 (21 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 21 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 85 SC

Headnote :

In 1900, the owner of the Dhalbhum estate, who was the predecessor of the first respondent, granted a permanent lease for mining rights of certain metals and minerals in the estate to Prince Mohammad Bakhtyar Shah. During the lifetime of this proprietor, the management of the estate was taken over b...
Brijendralal Gupta & ANR Vs. Jwalaprasad & Ors [1960] INSC 86 (22 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 22 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 86 SC

Headnote :

Thirteen candidates submitted their nomination papers for the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly elections. The nomination of candidate U was rejected because he did not provide a declaration of his age as required. After the election, the appellants were declared elected. Subsequently, one of the...
State of Bombay Vs. Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. [1960] INSC 87 (22 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 22 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 87 SC

Headnote :

In 1954, amendments were made to the Court Fees Act, 1870, as it applied to Bombay, through the Court Fees (Bombay Amendment) Act, 1954. These changes modified the system of charging court fees in the Bombay High Court on the original Side, replacing the previous fixed fee on the plaint with ad valo...
Radhakisan Laxminarayan Toshniwal Vs. Shridhar Ramchandra Alshi & Ors [1960] INSC 88 (23 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 23 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

The vendors entered into a sales agreement concerning a specific survey number, which was intended to be converted for non-agricultural use, after which a sale deed would be executed. Following this agreement, the vendors sought approval for the diversion, which was granted contingent upon the payme...
Pingle Industries Ltd., Secunderabad Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad [1960] INSC 89 (26 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 26 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 89 SC

Headnote :

Under a quolnama, the assessee company was granted exclusive monopoly rights to extract Shahabad Flag Stones from quarries located in six villages for a duration of 12 years, with an annual payment of Rs. 28,000, but was prohibited from manufacturing cement. The extraction of stones had to be conduc...
M/S. Piyare Lal Adishwar Lal Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Delhi [1960] INSC 90 (26 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 26 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 90 SC

Headnote :

S was the karta of a Hindu undivided family, which included himself and his younger brother. Their father served as the Treasurer of a Bank until his passing in 1950. While their father was alive, S worked as an overseer at the Bank, earning a monthly salary of Rs. 400. After his father\'s death, he...
The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd. Vs. Pothan Joseph [1960] INSC 91 (27 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 27 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 91 SC

Headnote :

The respondent served as the Editor of the Deccan Herald, which is owned and published by the appellant. The two contracts between the parties included an arbitration clause stating that any disputes arising from the interpretation or application of the contract would be referred to arbitration, wit...
Jadab Singh & Ors Vs. The Himachal Pradesh Administration & ANR [1960] INSC 92 (28 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 28 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 92 SC

Headnote :

On October 10, 1958, the Supreme Court invalidated the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act of 1953, ruling that the Legislative Assembly of the New Himachal Pradesh State that enacted it was improperly constituted and therefore lacked the authority to pass the Act (...
H. C. Narayanappa & Ors Vs. The State of Mysore & Ors [1960] INSC 93 (28 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 28 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

Exercising the authority granted by section 68C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, the General Manager of the Mysore Government Road Transport Department announced a plan to exclude private operators from certain routes within a designated area, reserving those routes for the State Transport Undertaki...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Ahmedabad Vs. Karamchand Premchand Ltd., Ahmedabad [1960] INSC 94 (28 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 28 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 94 SC

Headnote :

The assesses managed a limited company in what was then known as \"British India\" and also operated a pharmaceutical business in the Baroda State, which was an Indian State at that time. The business in British India generated profits that were subject to the Business Profits Tax Act, 1947, while t...
M/S. Chandaji Kubaji & Co. Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh [1960] INSC 95 (29 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 95 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company was engaged in the trade of ghee and groundnut oil, among other products. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer assessed the company for sales tax for the fiscal year 1948-49 based on a turnover of approximately Rs. 28,69,151. For the subsequent year, 1949-50, the appellant was ass...
Shrimant Dattaji Raobahirojirao Ghorpade Vs. Shrimant Vijayasinhrao & ANR [1960] INSC 96 (29 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Headnote :

Following the death of the estate holder in 1932, the Government of Bombay issued an order on June 7, 1932, to resume the Saranjam estate of Gajendragad and subsequently re-granted it to his eldest son. The same order also continued the assignment of certain lands from the estate to B, a younger fam...
A. S. T. Arunachalam Pillai Vs. M/S. Southern Roadways (Private) Ltd. [1960] INSC 97 (29 April 1960)

Judgement Date : 29 Apr 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The issue at hand in this appeal was whether the Regional Transport Officer, as per the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, amended by the Madras State Legislature, had the authority to modify the terms of a stage carriage permit issued under that Act. The appellant, who held a stage carriage permit, submitte...
The East and West Steamship Company, George Town, Madras Vs. S. K. Ramalingam Chettiar [1960] INSC 98 (3 May 1960)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Headnote :

The appellant in the first case (C. A. No. 88/56) and the respondents in the other two cases (C. As. Nos. 91 & 92 of 1958) were shipping companies that transported goods by sea between ports. They were responsible for delivering goods belonging to the opposing parties but failed to deliver all of th...
The Cotton Agents Ltd., Bombay Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay [1960] INSC 99 (3 May 1960)

Judgement Date : 03 May 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Headnote :

Messrs. Shivnarayan Surajmal Nomani served as the managing agents for the New Swadeshi Mills of Ahmedabad Ltd. The Nemani group, along with the appellant company, which is the assessee, held a significant number of shares in the mills.In 1944, a disagreement arose between the parties, leading to an...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. The Elphin-stone Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. [1960] INSC 100 (4 May 1960)

Judgement Date : 04 May 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 100 SC

Headnote :

On June 3, 1956, riots erupted in Bombay following a public meeting regarding the reorganization of the State of Bombay, which was disrupted due to disturbances. A crowd surrounded the car in which the appellant was traveling, and some individuals attempted to drag him out by his neck and hair. In r...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter