Wednesday, 22, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Petlad Turkey Red Dye Works Ltd. Vs. Dyes & Chemical Workers' Union, Petlad & ANR [1960] INSC 14 (3 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 03 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 14 SC

Headnote :

The Industrial Tribunal, while determining the available surplus, rejected the appellant employer\'s claim for interest on a specific amount in the depreciation fund, which was purportedly used as working capital. If this claim had been accepted and the claimed amount deducted as a prior charge, the...
Moti Ram Vs. Suraj Bhan & Ors [1960] INSC 15 (3 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 03 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

On August 28, 1956, the respondent applied to the Rent Controller for the eviction of the appellant from a shop under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, citing the need to reconstruct the shop as one of the reasons. At that time, Section 13(3)(a)(iii) of the Act allowed...
S. N. Namasivayam Chettiar Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras [1960] INSC 16 (3 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 03 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 16 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, who is a resident and ordinarily resides in India, engaged in the trade of grains and cattle food in Colombo. For the relevant assessment years, the Income-tax Officer dismissed the accounts submitted by the appellant, citing reasons such as the lack of vouchers and the failure to mai...
S. S. Light Railway Co., Ltd. Vs. Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd. & ANR [1960] INSC 17 (9 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

In accordance with Section 32 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (IX of 1890), the Central Government issued a notification establishing specific rates for terminal charges related to the loading and unloading of goods transported by railway from one station to another. Despite this notification, the...
M/S Kundan Sugar Mills Vs. Ziyauddin & Ors [1960] INSC 18 (9 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

The General Manager of the appellant Mills directed the transfer of four workers from the appellant mill to a newly acquired mill. The only link between the two mills was their shared ownership; otherwise, they were entirely separate entities. The affected workers objected to the transfer order and...
The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Hafiz Mohammad Ismail and Hafiz Jawed Ali [1960] INSC 19 (9 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 19 SC

Headnote :

The individuals involved were discovered selling counterfeit soaps branded as Sunlight and Lifebuoy, leading to their prosecution under section 486 of the Indian Penal Code. The Magistrate determined that the similarity between the packaging and labels of the counterfeit soaps and those of the authe...
The Associated Cement Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. D. Vyas & Ors [1960] INSC 20 (11 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 11 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

The draft standing orders that the appellants submitted to the certifying officer for certification under section 3(1) of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, were modified by the certifying officer on the basis that these changes were necessary to align with the model standing ord...
Smt. Nagindra Bala Mitra & ANR Vs. Sunil Chandra Roy & ANR [1960] INSC 21 (12 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 21 SC

Headnote :

In a jury trial, it is crucial for the judge to guide the jury in understanding the evidence accurately, ensuring that they can properly resolve the key issues in the case based on the true meaning of the evidence presented by both sides. Since the jury\'s verdict relies on the judge\'s instructions...
Mis. Rohtas Sugar Ltd., & Ors Vs. Their Workmen [1960] INSC 22 (12 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 22 SC

Headnote :

The unskilled seasonal laborers in the Bihar Sugar Industry, primarily from the landless laborer class, lost their contractual relationship with employers at the end of the sugar season. When the next season began, they might or might not return to work. These workers raised disputes regarding the p...
The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen & ANR [1960] INSC 23 (12 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 23 SC

Headnote :

Due to the appellant-employer\'s refusal to establish minimum wages and rates for the contract work performed by the workmen-respondents, who claimed they were compensated below the subsistence wage level, the matter was brought before the Industrial Tribunal for resolution. The first Tribunal was u...
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay Vs. Chandulal Keshavlal & Co., Petlad [1960] INSC 24 (17 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 17 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 24 SC

Headnote :

The assessee served as the Managing Agent for a company, earning a total commission of Rs. 3,09,114 for the accounting year 950.Upon the oral request of the company\'s Directors during that accounting year, the assessee consented to accept only Rs. 1,00,000 as commission, forfeiting the remaining am...
The Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay North & Ors Vs. M/S. Harivallabhdas Kalidas and Co. [1960] INSC 25 (19 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Headnote :

The respondent firm, Harivallabhdas Kalidas, was designated as the Managing Agent for Shri Ambika Mills Ltd., the appellant in the related appeal, through a Managing Agency Agreement. The pertinent section of the agreement stated: (2)(a) The Company shall pay the Firm either a commission of 5% on th...
The Brihan Maharashtra Sugarsyndicate Ltd. Vs. Janardan Ramchandra Kulkarni& Ors [1960] INSC 26 (22 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

The respondent submitted an application under section 53-C of the Companies Act, 1913, along with an alternative request for winding up against the appellant company, to the District Judge in Poona, who was authorized under the Act to exercise jurisdiction. While this application was still pending,...
The Tinnevelly-Tuticorin Electric supply Co. Ltd., Vs. Its Workmen [1960] INSC 27 (22 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Headnote :

Is the Full Bench formula for calculating bonuses applicable to claims made by workers in the electricity sector? This was the issue presented for resolution in this appeal. A Special Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal affirmed this applicability, and the validity of its ruling is contested in t...
The Bihar State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax [1960] INSC 28 (22 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Headnote :

The Appellant Bank, registered under the Cooperative Societies Act of 1922, received interest payments on deposits made with the Imperial Bank of India during the relevant accounting years. The Income Tax Officer classified these amounts as income from other sources under section 12 of the Indian In...
Shri Balwan Singh Vs. Shri Lakshmi Narain & Ors [1960] INSC 29 (23 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

The first respondent submitted an election petition seeking a declaration that the appellant\'s election was invalid, alleging that the appellant engaged in corrupt practices as defined under section 123(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Specifically, it was claimed that the appellan...
The State of Vindhya Pradesh (Now Madhya Pradesh) Vs. Moradhwaj Singh & Ors [1960] INSC 30 (24 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 24 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Headnote :

The appeals in question addressed the constitutional validity of the Vindhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs and Land Reforms Act, 1952 (XI of 1952). Applications were submitted to the Judicial Commissioner under Article 226 of the Constitution, arguing that several provisions of the Act imposed unreaso...
Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammedamir Abbas Abbassi & Ors Vs. The State of Madhya Bharat & Ors [1960] INSC 31 (26 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Headnote :

The first petitioner, who had moved to West Pakistan, sought a writ of habeas corpus from the High Court of Madhya Bharat, requesting that his two minor children, petitioners 2 and 3, be brought before the Court, claiming they were unlawfully confined. After his application was dismissed, he approac...
Rabari Ghela Jadav Vs. The State of Bombay [1960] INSC 32 (26 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 32 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was found guilty under section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court. His appeal to the High Court was accepted solely on the issue of sentencing, and during the hearing, the sentence was reduced to 10 years of imprisonment. In a subs...
Mohamed Dastagir Vs. The State of Madras [1960] INSC 33 (26 February 1960)

Judgement Date : 26 Mar 1960

Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was tried by the Special Judge in Tiruchirappalli under Section 165A of the Indian Penal Code for attempting to bribe K, a Deputy Superintendent of Police. The prosecution\'s case was that during the investigation of a case involving the appellant, he visited K\'s bungalow and handed h...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter