Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of october 1953

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Habeeb Mohammad Vs. The State of Hyderabad [1953] INSC 53 (5 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 05 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 53 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 162. Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence
CrPC Section 172. Diary of proceeding in investigation
CrPC Section 216. Court may alter charge
CrPC Section 257. Withdrawal of complaint
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

While the prosecution is not obligated to call every available witness, regardless of their number or reliability, it must call witnesses who are crucial to the presentation of its case. These witnesses must be called regardless of whether their testimony supports or undermines the prosecutionâ€™s c...

Read full Judgement

Sidheshwar Mukherjee Vs. Bhubneshwar Prasad Narainsingh & Ors [1953] INSC 54 (5 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 05 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 54 SC

Headnote :

A person who has obtained a decree against a member of a joint Hindu family for a debt is entitled to attach and sell the debtorâ€™s interest in the joint family property. If the debt is not immoral or illegal, the interest of the judgment debtorâ€™s sons in the joint family property would also pass...

Read full Judgement

Deputy Commissioner, Hardoi Vs. Rama Krishna Narain & Ors [1953] INSC 55 (8 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

Creditors who did not actively participate in the proceedings are not considered necessary parties in an appeal from an order rejecting a claim made under Section 11(2) of the U.P. Encumbered Estates Act, 1934. The technical rules of the Civil Procedure Code concerning the inclusion of parties shoul...

Read full Judgement

Minerva Mills Ltd. Vs. Their Workers [1953] INSC 56 (8 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Constitution of India
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

Under Section 7 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the appropriate Government has the authority to establish an industrial tribunal for a specified duration and to create a new tribunal once that period expires, to hear and resolve all references that were made to the previous tribunal but remain...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombay City Vs. The Century Spinning And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. [1953] INSC 57 (8 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 57 SC

Business Profits Tax Act, 1947

Headnote :

The balance sheet of a company for the calendar year 1945 reported a profit of Rs. 90,44,677, after accounting for provisions for depreciation and taxation. Following this, a balance of Rs. 5,08,637 was carried forward to the balance sheet of the next year, 1st January 1946, without being designated...

Read full Judgement

Allahabad Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1953] INSC 58 (8 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Headnote :

A banking company executed a deed in which it intended to create a trust for paying pensions to its retiring staff members. A specified sum of money was entrusted to three individuals named as trustees, and the deed allowed the company to make additional contributions to the fund. However, the deed...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal Vs. Jeewanlal Ltd. [1953] INSC 59 (8 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 08 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Headnote :

A company will typically be considered a \"company whose directors have a controlling interest\" under the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, only if the directors hold, and are registered as holders of, a majority of the voting shares in the company. It is not required that the directors have a benefici...

Read full Judgement

Sir Kikabhai Premchand Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bombay [1953] INSC 60 (9 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

Headnote :

The assessee, who conducted business in bullion and shares, followed the mercantile system of accounting. To determine his profits, he valued the stock at both the beginning and the end of the year at cost price.During the accounting year, the assessee withdrew some silver bars and shares from the b...

Read full Judgement

Chainrup Sampatram Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1953] INSC 61 (9 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 09 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

The assessee firm, which conducted business in bullion in Calcutta, sent a quantity of silver bars to Bikaner, where its partners resided, during the accounting year. The firm recorded these bars as having been sold to the partners.The Income-tax authorities doubted the sale claim and, treating the...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. K. R. M. T. T. Thiagaraja Chetty & Co [1953] INSC 62 (14 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 14 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Headnote :

Under the terms of a managing agency agreement, the assessee firm, acting as managing agents of a company, were entitled to a commission based on a percentage of the profits. In the company\'s books, a sum of Rs. 2,26,850 was shown as commission due to the firm for the year 1941-42. This amount was...

Read full Judgement

C. N. Arunachala Mudaliar Vs. C. A. Muruganatha Mudaliar & ANR [1953] INSC 63 (14 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 14 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Headnote :

A property gifted by a father to his son does not automatically become ancestral property in the sonâ€™s hands merely because it was given by the father. The father, when making the gift, has the authority to specify whether the gift is for the exclusive use of the son or if it is intended for the b...

Read full Judgement

Jagadguru Gurushiddaswami Vs. Dakshina Maharashtra Digambarjain Sabha [1953] INSC 64 (14 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 14 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Headnote :

In 1887, the head of a math granted a permanent lease of property owned by the math. In 1910, the successor of the lessee gifted the leased premises to a Jain Sabha for the purpose of constructing a school, with the condition that if the school was removed or ceased to exist, the property would reve...

Read full Judgement

Saraswathi Ammal & ANR Vs. Rajagopal Ammal [1953] INSC 65 (20 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 20 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 65 SC

Headnote :

A perpetual endowment of properties intended for samadhi kainkaryam, which refers to the worship at the tomb of an individual, is not recognized as valid under Hindu law.If a purpose is asserted as valid for perpetual dedication based on religious merit, it must be demonstrated to have a Shastraic f...

Read full Judgement

Kshetra Mohan-Sannyasicharan Sadhukhan Vs. Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax, West Bangal [1953] INSC 66 (20 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 20 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 66 SC

Headnote :

Although a partnership formed by the kartas of two Hindu undivided families is commonly referred to as a partnership between those two families, legally it is considered a partnership between the two kartas, and the other family members do not automatically become partners. Individual members of a H...

Read full Judgement

Commissioner of Income-Taxbombay City Vs. Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. [1953] INSC 67 (26 October 1953)

Judgement Date : 26 Oct 1953

Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 67 SC

Headnote :

The Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd., the assessee, was established primarily to operate as a racecourse company and to create clubs, hotels, and other facilities related to the company\'s property. It had two types of members: club members, limited to 350, and stand members, who were elected thro...

Read full Judgement

«
1
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs