Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 946 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:3805]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 780/2020
1. Sanwar Lal Regar S/o Mahavir Prasad Regar, Aged About
30 Years, R/o Vpo Dohariya, Phuliya Kalan, District
Bhilwara (Raj.).
2. Ramesh Chandra Meena S/o Pokhar Lal Meena, Aged
About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Nandrai Via Bigod, Tehsil Kotri,
District Bhilwara (Raj.).
3. Sampat Raj Sukhariya S/o Ghenwar Chand Sukhariya,
Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Juni Bass Samdari,
Tehsil Samdari, District Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Smt. Suchi Sharma, Secretary, Sanskrit Education,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2. Dr. Deeraghram Ramsnehi, Director, Directorate Of
Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha
Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. Dr. Dirgaram Ramsanehi, Joint Director, Directorate Of
Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Shiksha
Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
4. Sh. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Divisional Sanskrit Education
Officer, Sanskrit Education, Ajmer Division, Ajmer
(Rajasthan).
5. Sh. Jassi Ram Ramsanahi, Divisional Sanskrit Education
Officer, Sanskrit Education, Jodhpur Division, Jodhpur
(Rajasthan).
6. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Sanskrit
Education Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG with
Mr. Deepak Chandak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
21/01/2026 The present contempt petition has been filed alleging
violation of the Order dated 09.08.2019 passed by a Coordinate
Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11856/2019.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
(Uploaded on 21/01/2026 at 07:21:54 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:3805] (2 of 2) [WCP-780/2020]
Compliance Report has been filed.
Learned AAG submits that in compliance of the directions of
this Court, issue of the petitioners was considered in light of the
judgment rendered in Surja Ram's case and the order dated
23.05.2024 (Annx.R/1) was passed, vide which due service
benefits were granted to them.
In view of above, this Court is satisfied that compliance of
the order under contempt has been made.
Dismissed accordingly. Rule is discharged.
However, if any grievance of the petitioners still survives,
they are at liberty to take recourse of remedy available to them
under the law for challenging the Order dated 23.05.2024, if so
advised.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 277-mSingh/-
(Uploaded on 21/01/2026 at 07:21:54 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!