Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1533 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2025
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (SB)
No.1100/2025
in
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1284/2025
Ramswaroop Khichi S/o Narayan Khichi, Aged About 53 Years,
R/o Gram Barsani, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara, At Present
Head Constable No.910, Police Chowki Mandal Choraha, Police
Station Mandal, District Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In District
Jail Bhilwara)
----Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Devendra Sanwalot
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)
Order
06/06/2025
1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been
moved on behalf of the applicant-appellant in the matter of
judgment dated 31.05.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge,
Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Bhilwara in Misc. Cases
No.02/2014 whereby he was convicted and sentenced to suffer
maximum punishment of 04 years' simple imprisonment for the
offences under Section 13(1)(D) read with Section 13(2) of PC Act
and Section 7 of PC Act.
2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant-appellant that the
learned trial Judge has not appreciated the facts and evidence
[2025:RJ-JD:26908] (2 of 4) [CRLAS-1284/2025]
available on record correctly and reached at an erroneous
conclusion of guilt without there being any sufficient evidence
available on record against the applicant-appellant. It is thus been
asserted that the entire record is to be appreciated again by this
court being the first appellate Court. It has further been asserted
that the appellant-applicant was on bail during the course of trial
and did not misuse the liberty so granted to him. It has further
been asserted that the allegation against the applicant-appellant is
of demand of Rs.5,000/- as bribe whereas he had no relation with
the work alleged to have been required to be done in lieu of the
bribe in question. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant
further submits that hearing of the appeal is likely to take long
time, therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be
granted.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently
opposed the prayer made on behalf of the accused applicant-
appellant for releasing him on application for suspension of
sentence and submits that looking to the nature of offences
alleged, it is interest of the society that the applicant-appellant
stays behind the bars.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
material available on record.
5. Considering the submissions of both the parties and after
perusal of the record so also considering the totality of facts and
circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that hearing
of appeal is likely to take further more time and considering the
fact that the applicant-appellant was on bail during the trial and
[2025:RJ-JD:26908] (3 of 4) [CRLAS-1284/2025]
that the issue of demand and acceptance of bribe in question is an
arguable point thus, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case
for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.
6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed
under Section 415 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the
sentence passed by learned trial court, the details of which are
provided in the first para of this order, against the appellant-
applicant named above shall remain suspended till final disposal of
the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he
executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two
sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial
Judge for his appearance in this court on 08.07.2025 and
whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the
conditions indicated below:-
(i) That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
(ii) That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
(iii) Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of
the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as
Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-
applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also
be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall
not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to
[2025:RJ-JD:26908] (4 of 4) [CRLAS-1284/2025]
pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said
accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the
learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for
cancellation of bail.
(SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)),J 100-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!