Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manisha vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26750)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1466 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1466 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Manisha vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26750) on 3 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:26750]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1610/2025

1.       Manisha D/o Subhash, Aged About 19 Years, Residence Of
         Village Umriya Post Bhikan Ganv District Khargon Madhya
         Pradesh At Present Residence Of Govt Hospital Road
         Bhadwasia Jodhpur
2.       Gopal S/o Shankar Lal, Aged About 24 Years, Residence
         Of Gram Jhutawad District Ujjain Madhya Pradesh At
         Present Residence Of Govt Hospital Road Bhadwaisya
         Jodhpur
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
         Of Home Affairs Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat
         Jaipur
2.       The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur
3.       The Sho, Police Station Mata Ka Than Jodhpur
4.       The Sho, Police Station Aaiyarkheda Madhya Pradesh
5.       Subhash S/o Babu Lal, Residence Of Village Umriya Post
         Bhikan Ganv District Khargon Madhya Pradesh
6.       Paras S/o Babu Lal, R/o Village Umriya Post Bhikan Ganv
         District Khargon Madhya Pradesh
7.       Deepak S/o Subhash, R/o Umriya Post Bhikan Ganv
         District Khargon Madhya Pradesh
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Harindra Singh Inda
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)

Order

03/06/2025

1. The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

[2025:RJ-JD:26750] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1610/2025]

2. The petitioners, both being major persons, claim to be in a

live-in relationship. They submit that they are living with each

other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threatened at the hands of respondent nos. 5 to 7.

3. Petitioners, who are major and willingly living in a

relationship without entering into marriage, also cannot be denied

protection of their life and liberty since it is a fundamental right of

every citizen being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India,

as has been observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal [(2010)5 SCC 600] and Joseph

Shine Vs. Union of India [(2019)3 SCC 39]. Thus, the petitioners

deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.

4. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

live-in-relationship agreement have been filed on record. Thus,

taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P., reported in AIR

2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing

the Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur to provide protection to the

petitioners deserves to be accepted.

5. This Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, is not inclined

to enter into examining the validity of legality of the relationship

of the parties. Therefore, it does not render any affirmation of

legality and validity of the status of parties under which they are

living together. However, keeping in mind the propositions of law

set forth by the Apex Court in a catena of judgments and in order

to protect the fundamental rights of the parties for their life and

liberty guaranteed under the Constitution, this petition is disposed

[2025:RJ-JD:26750] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1610/2025]

of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Commissioner of

Police, Jodhpur for ventilation of their grievances.

6. In case the petitioners move any application, it is expected

from the Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur, to take necessary

action to ensure that no illegal hindrance is caused to the peaceful

life and liberty of the petitioners by private respondents, who are

not agreeable to their relationship, but only after verifying the

facts, if required.

7. The Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur shall ensure that no

harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship.

8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the

civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

9. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)),J 115-mohit/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter