Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandra Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:52868)
2025 Latest Caselaw 16811 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16811 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Chandra Devi vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:52868) on 6 December, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:52868]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3572/2025

1.       Chandra Devi W/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years,
         Daughter Of Kheta Ram, Resident Of Bhil Basti, Gram
         Balvada, Tehsil Sahila, District Jalore At Present Reside At
         Village Aalasan, Tehsil Jalore, District Jalore (Raj).
2.       Hansa Ram S/o Bija Ram, Aged About 23 Years, Resident
         Of Village Aalasan, Tehsil Jalore, District Jalore Raj.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                      Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
         Home Affairs, Jaipur Raj.
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore (Raj).
3.       The Station House Officer, Police Station Noshra, District
         Jalore Raj.
4.       The Station House Officer, Police Station Bishangarh,
         District Jalore Raj..
5.       Oma Ram S/o Kheta Ram, Resident Of Village Raithal,
         Tehsil Aashore, District Jalore (Raj)..
6.       Durga Ram S/o Kheta Ram, Resident Of Village Raithal,
         Tehsil Aashore, District Jalore (Raj)..
7.       Vikram S/o Kheta Ram, Resident Of Village Raithal, Tehsil
         Aashore, District Jalore (Raj)..
8.       Madan S/o Kheta Ram, Resident Of Village Raithal, Tehsil
         Aashore, District Jalore (Raj)..
9.       Jaipa Ram S/o Kheta Ram, Resident Of Village Raithal,
         Tehsil Aashore, District Jalore (Raj)..
10.      Bhikha Ram S/o Bija Ram, Resident Of Village Rahila,
         Tehsil Rahila, District Jalore (Raj)..
11.      Suresh Kumar S/o Bija Ram, Resident Of Village Rahila,
         Tehsil Rahila, District Jalore (Raj)..
12.      Lumba Ram S/o Bija Ram, Resident Of Village Rahila,
         Tehsil Rahila, District Jalore (Raj)..
13.      Sona Ram S/o Pappa Ram, Resident Of Mohan Ji Ri Pyau,
         Police Station Bishangarh, District Jalore Raj.
14.      Prakash S/o Pappa Ram, Resident Of Mohan Ji Ri Pyau,
         Police Station Bishangarh, District Jalore Raj.


                        (Uploaded on 06/12/2025 at 03:43:49 PM)
                       (Downloaded on 06/12/2025 at 08:46:23 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:52868]                   (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-3572/2025]


15.      Sama Ram S/o Pappa Ram, Resident Of Mohan Ji Ri Pyau,
         Police Station Bishangarh, District Jalore Raj.
16.      Soni Lal S/o Pappa Ram, Resident Of Mohan Ji Ri Pyau,
         Police Station Bishangarh, District Jalore Raj.
17.      Jabra Ram S/o Pappa Ram, Resident Of Mohan Ji Ri Pyau,
         Police Station Bishangarh, District Jalore Raj.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :    Mr. Rajesh Kumar
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

06/12/2025

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent

authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection

but no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522,

the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned

(Uploaded on 06/12/2025 at 03:43:49 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:52868] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3572/2025]

respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners

deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 271-divyashri/-

(Uploaded on 06/12/2025 at 03:43:49 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter