Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parema Ram vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 3506 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3506 Raj
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Parema Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 24 April, 2023
Bench: Arun Bhansali, Rajendra Prakash Soni

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4784/2023

Parema Ram

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.L. Deora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Shah, Sr. Adv./AAG with Mr. Nishant Bafna

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI

Order

24/04/2023

1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in

the advertisement dated 11.11.2020 Annexure-2, the respondents

while prescribing the physical standards and efficiency test has not

taken into consideration the provisions of Rule 8-A (iii) of the

Rajasthan Civil Service (Absorption of Ex-servicemen) Rules, 1988

which prescribes that for selection of any post the parameter of

physical fitness test shall be relaxed appropriately by the State

Government.

2. Submissions have been made that a specific stipulation has

been made in the advertisement that the standards prescribed

shall apply to all candidates irrespective of the fact whether they

belong to Ex-servicemen category. Further submissions have been

made that relaxation in physical standards have been granted in

(2 of 3) [CW-4784/2023]

other recruitment pertaining to constable and sub-inspector etc.

by State/ RPSC.

3. Learned AAG made submissions with reference of judgment

in Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (2017) 4 SCC 357 that the

challenge laid to the provision is belated, as the petitioners have

appeared in the written examination without any protest and now

are questioning the physical standards and, therefore, the petition

is not maintainable.

4. Counsel for the petitioner made submissions that the

judgment in the case of Ashok Kumar (supra) is not applicable as

the challenge laid therein, was after the result of recruitment was

declared. The respondents are yet to undertake the physical test

in terms of the advertisement.

5. Learned AAG made further submissions that the physical test

is scheduled from today onwards and, therefore, any interference

by the way of interim order at this stage would unnecessary affect

those candidates, who want to participate in the physical test

irrespective of non-grant of relaxation to Ex-servicemen and

therefore, stay of test will not serve any purpose. Further

submissions have been made that similar nature petitions have

been fixed on 09.05.2023.

6. In the circumstances of the case, wherein when the similar

nature petitions are coming up on 09.05.2023, the physical test

date shall not be disturbed as the same is to take place today

onwards, we deem it appropriate that the respondents may go

ahead with the physical test pursuant to the advertisement dated

11.11.2020, however, the result of ex-servicemen category

pertaining to the Non-TSP area, shall not be declared by the

(3 of 3) [CW-4784/2023]

respondents without prior permission from this Court. Reply to the

petition, if any be filed before the next date.

7. List the petition on 09.05.2023.

(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (ARUN BHANSALI),J

8-Anshul/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter