Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sher Mohammad vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 12009 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12009 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Sher Mohammad vs State Of Rajasthan on 29 September, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 2)                   [CRLR-1189/2022]


       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1189/2022

Sher Mohammad S/o Fatah Mohammad, Aged About 41 Years,
R/o B-26 Municipal Colony (Near Head Post Office) Chittorgarh
Raj.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Pushpendra Kothari S/o Rajendra Singh Kothari, R/o
         Pratapnagar Chittorgarh Raj.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Mahaveer Singh
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP
                                Mr. Surendra Bhagmalani



       HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

29/09/2022

       For the reasons mentioned in the application filed under

Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the same is hereby allowed.

       It is stated at the Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties after the judgment dated 14.11.2019 passed

by the appellate court whereby the judgment dated 10.09.2018

passed by the trial court has been affirmed.

       It is borne out that the complainant-respondent is not

inclined to proceed further in the matter.

       Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs Sayed

Babalal H [2010(5) SCC 66].

       Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant


                     (Downloaded on 30/09/2022 at 09:14:56 PM)
                                                                           (2 of 2)                 [CRLR-1189/2022]


                                   respondent had accepted the sum towards full and final settlement

                                   of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant and in the

                                   light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law laid

                                   down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.

                                   Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the sentence awarded to

                                   the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be

                                   set aside. However, since the compromise has been arrived at

                                   after rejection of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, a cost of

                                   15% of the cheque amount deserves to be imposed upon the

                                   petitioner in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Apex

                                   court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra).

                                         Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the

                                   cheque amount with the State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur

                                   within a period of two weeks from today.

                                         The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the

                                   petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments

                                   Act, vide judgment dated 10.09.2018 passed by learned Addl.

                                   Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Chittorgarh in Regular Criminal

                                   Case No. 144/2016 (507/2016) as affirmed by judgment dated

                                   14.11.2019 passed by learned Addl. Session Judge No. 3,

                                   Chittorgarh in Criminal Appeal No.155/2018, is hereby set aside

                                   on the basis of the aforesaid compromise.

                                         The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending

                                   applications also stand disposed of.



                                                                (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

214-suraj/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter