Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suman Kumar Thakur vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 395 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 395 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Suman Kumar Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 10 February, 2026

Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16184 of 2024
     ======================================================
     Suman Kumar Thakur S/o Late Mahabir Thakur, Resident of Village-
     Tulapatti, P.S.-Pipra, District-Supaul, Bihar-852108.
                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
1.    The State of Bihar.
2.   The Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Headquarter, Bihar
     Police, Sardar Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3.   Additional Director General of Police, Welfare, Bihar Police, Sardar Patel
     Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4.   Additional Director General of Police (Training), Bihar Police, Sardar Patel
     Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
5.   Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Bihar Police, Budha Colony,
     Danapur Road, Patna, Bihar-800001.
6.   The Senior Superintendent of Police, District-Nalanda.
                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Ashok Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
                                    Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Advocate
     For the State          :       Mr. Prashant Pratap (GP- 2)
                                    Mr. Asit Kumar Jha (AC to GP-2)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

                            ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 10-02-2026

                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

      counsel for the State.

                       2. The present writ application has been filed for

      directing the respondents to consider the promotion of petitioner

      to the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police (A.S.I.) and then

      to the next higher post of Sub-Inspector of Police (S.I.) with

      effect from the date from which similar and even several junior

      colleagues have been promoted. Further prayer has been made

      to grant all consequential including financial benefits of
 Patna High Court CWJC No.16184 of 2024 dt.10-02-2026
                                           2/4




         promotion with arrears along with appropriate cost for

         compelling the petitioner to come in litigation.

                        3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

         the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable in the year

         1995. He submits that after appointment in the year 1995, the

         petitioner was imparted with the basic training of police and has

         also successfully completed the PTC. Counsel submits that after

         passing PTC and being a literate Constable, he was eligible for

         promotion to the post of A.S.I. and to the next higher post of

         Sub-Inspector of Police. He further submits that the petitioner

         has a clean and fair service career and there was no

         departmental proceeding against him. He submits that the

         petitioner deserve reward for his brave act of encounter with

         notorious dacoit gang in which he got injured with bullet in his

         leg, but even then, he was suffering ignorance and

         discrimination and even due promotion has not been provided to

         him. Counsel further submits that the counter affidavit has been

         filed on behalf of the respondent no.6, in which the stand has

         been taken in para 8 that action is being taken to ensure the

         petitioner's promotion and for that, the Dy.S.P. (reserve), Police

         Line, Nalanda has been directed to enter the fact regarding

         passing of the petitioner in basic training examination and to
 Patna High Court CWJC No.16184 of 2024 dt.10-02-2026
                                           3/4




         proceed further for grant of promotion vide Nalanda District

         Order No. 1261 of 2024. In pursuance to that, a report vide

         Memo No. 7922 dated 03.12.2024 has been submitted by the

         Dy.S.P. (reserve), Police Line, Nalanda, mentioning therein that

         as per the direction, the fact regarding clearance in basic

         training examination has been entered and his name has been

         sent to the I.G. Police, Central Range, Patna for promotion vide

         Memo No. 6933 dated 09.10.2024 issued by the Dy.S.P.

         (reserve), Police Line, Nalanda (annexed as Annexure- R-6/5).

         Counsel submits that the petitioner has been working since,

         1995, but till date, not a single promotion has been granted to

         him.

                        4. Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand,

         submits that from the pleadings of the counter affidavit, it is

         crystal clear that the petitioner's case was referred before the

         I.G. Police, Central Range, Patna and in that view of the matter,

         the grievance of the petitioner has been settled. Therefore, he

         submits that the present writ application may be disposed off.

                        5. In the light of the submissions made, particularly

         the grievance of the petitioner that his promotion has not been

         considered, but subsequently, vide Memo No. 7922 dated

         03.12.2024

, the matter was referred before the I.G. Police, Patna High Court CWJC No.16184 of 2024 dt.10-02-2026

Central Range, Patna for promotion, this Court is not satisfied

with this step.

6. As such, this Court hereby directs the Inspector

General of Police, Central Range, Bihar Police, Budha Colony,

Danapur Road, Patna (Respondent no.5) to take a decision with

regard to the promotion of the petitioner within 60 days from

the date of production of a copy of this order. It is made clear

that the petitioner shall be entitled for promotion from the date

of his eligibility, as for the purpose of non-entry of his basic

training in the service book, the petitioner is not responsible and

it is the concerned respondent authority who has to take care of

that. It is also directed to calculate the arrears and other

entitlement of the petitioner in accordance with law, within the

said period.

7. Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this

writ petition is hereby allowed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                     NA
Uploading Date             12/02/2026
Transmission Date            NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter