Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramnarayan Ram vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2025 Latest Caselaw 2596 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2596 Patna
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Ramnarayan Ram vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 21 August, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25100 of 2018
     ======================================================
     Ramnarayan Ram son of late Ramkeshwar Ram resident of Village-
     Kishunpura, P.S. - Ramgarh, District- Kaimur at Bhabhu.


                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food & Civil
     Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Principal Secretary, Food and Civil Supplies Department, Government
     of Bihar, Patna
3.   The Commissioner, Patna Divison, Patna
4.   The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
5.   The Sub Divisional Officer, Mohania.
6.   The Block Supply Officer, Ramgarh.
7.   Upendra Kumar Ram Son of Mrulidhar Ram resident of village- Bahpura,
     P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Kaimur at Bhabhua.


                                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s    :     Mr.Saket Tiwary, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s    :     Mr.S.Raza Ahmad -AAG5
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA
     CHAKRAVARTHY
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 21-08-2025

1. The Writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"(i) For setting aside memo No 692 dated 19.09.2018 issued by the Collector-cum-Chairman of District Selection Committee, Kaimur to the extent to which the application of the Patna High Court CWJC No.25100 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

petitioner for selection as P.D.S. Dealer has been wrongly rejected and respondent no. 7 has been appointed.

(ii) For issuance of direction to appoint the petitioner in place of the respondent 7."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of

the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System

(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of

appeal and Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted

Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016

provides for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii)

32(v) and 32(vi) read as follows:

"32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by an order of the licensing authority denying the issue or renewal of the license to the fair price shop owner or cancellation of the license may appeal to the District Officer within thirty days of the date of receipt of the order and the District Magistrate shall, as far as practicable, dispose the appeal within a period of sixty days."

Patna High Court CWJC No.25100 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub-clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months."

3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner

has an alternative remedy under the provisions of

Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)

Order, 2016.

4. The remedy available under the Act is to

prefer an appeal before the District Magistrate. As

the District Magistrate is the head of the Selection

Committee, he cannot review his orders in an Patna High Court CWJC No.25100 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

appeal. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to file

a complaint/application before the Divisional

Commissioner.

5. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a

complaint/application before the concerned

authority, but the limitation period for filing the

same has lapsed. He prayed for a direction to the

concerned authority to entertain the same in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

6. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing

complaint/application, the Writ petition is disposed

of with a direction to the petitioner to file

complaint/application within one month from the

date of receipt of this order before the concerned

authority. The delay in filing the complaint/

application shall be condoned by the authority

concerned, and the authority shall dispose of the

same within three months from the date of filing of

the same.

7. With the above said observation, the Writ Patna High Court CWJC No.25100 of 2018 dt.21-08-2025

petition is disposed of.

8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter