Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amit Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 1487 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1487 Patna
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Patna High Court

Amit Kumar Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 7 August, 2025

Author: P. B. Bajanthri
Bench: P. B. Bajanthri
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6773 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Amit Kumar Singh Son of Sri Dhurandhar Prasad Singh, resident of Mohalla
     - RahulNagar Brahmpura, P.S. - Brahmpura, P.O. - MIT, District -
     Muzaffarpur.


                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise,
     Prohibition and Registration, Bihar, Patna.


2.   The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.


3.   The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah.


4.   The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah.


5.   The Superintendent of Excise West Champaran at Bettiah.


6.   The District Transport Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah.


7.   The S.H.O. Nadi Police Station, Bettiah.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Standing Counsel (06)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
             and
             HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
     ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 07-08-2025

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

following relief(s):-

Patna High Court CWJC No.6773 of 2025 dt.07-08-2025

"(i) To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing upon the respondent Superintendent of Excise to handover the possession of Bolero Pickup vehicle No. UP60T-

3944 which has been received by way of Public Auction and deposit of auction money amounting to Rs.78,000/- failing which bid amount be refunded.

(ii) To direct the respondent No.6 with interest to make the payment of compensation to the petitioner amounting to Rs.25,000/- causing mental and physical agony meted out to the petitioner whose vehicle has not been delivered after rectification in release order.

(iii) To any other relief/s to which the petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."

2. On 31.07.2025, we have passed the following

order:-

"Respondent No. 5-Superintendent of Excise, West Champaran at Bettiah, is hereby directed to file his personal affidavit as to why the auctioned vehicle in favour of the petitioner has not been released pursuant to the auction dated petitioner has not been released since 16.11.2021.

2. Re-list this matter on 07.08.2025."

3. Personal affidavit of the Respondent No. 5-

Superintendent of Excise, West Champaran at Bettiah has been

filed and it has not been placed in the file, we have perused the

file of the State counsel. There is no communication to the Patna High Court CWJC No.6773 of 2025 dt.07-08-2025

petitioner from 16.11.2021 till 17.05.2025 in respect of

furnishing documents and getting the vehicle released in his

favour with reference to the fact that he being the successful

bidder.

4. On the other hand learned counsel for the State

submitted that there were certain errors committed in the

confiscation order, if it is so, it should have been rectified within

a reasonable period of time of one month or two months and

thereafter it should have been communicated to the petitioner

asking him to furnish such of those required documents within a

reasonable period of time of three months. On the other hand,

they slept over the matter till 17.05.2025, therefore, there is total

inaction on the part of the respondents in not honouring the

auction proceedings in respect of subject matter vehicle.

5. Be that as it may, now the subject matter vehicle

which was lying in the custody of respondents from the year

2021 to this day and it has depreciation value on yearly basis,

therefore, it is not appropriate to direct the official respondents

to release the subject matter vehicle in favour of the petitioner.

6. On the other hand, petitioner is entitled to have the

benefit of refund of deposited amount of Rs. 78,000/- along with

interest @ 8 per cent per annum from 01.12.2021 till payment is Patna High Court CWJC No.6773 of 2025 dt.07-08-2025

made and the same shall be calculated and disbursed in favour

of petitioner within a period of three months from the date of

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

7. The present writ petition is allowed with cost of Rs.

10,000/-. Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of

eight weeks.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) ranjan/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          12.08.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter