Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3434 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10611 of 2015
======================================================
Krishna Prasad Rajak S/o Sri Yugal Rajak, Resident of Village- Bhawanpur, P.O. and P.S. Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.
3. The Addl. Collector, Bhagalpur.
4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bhagalpur.
5. The Circle Officer, Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur.
6. The Circle Inspector, Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur.
7. The Halka Karamchari, Jagdishpur, Bhagalpur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Rahmatullah, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Dhurjati Kr. Prasad, G.P.-14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-08-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed directing
the respondent authority to settle the land under the Bihar
Government Scheme in favour of the petitioner on which the
petitioner is residing by constructing his house for more than 25
years back.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner is constructed a Jhopri on a land appertaining to
Revenue Thana No. 418, Khata No. 481 and Plot No. 404 area Patna High Court CWJC No.10611 of 2015 dt.01-08-2023
14 decimal, Mouza- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur. He further
submits that petitioner is residing on the said land since last 25
years and he has approached to the Additional Collector,
Bhagalpur but there is no response, then he moved before Janta
Darwar and also given to the application to the State Mahadalit
Ayog for his grievances. Counsel further submits that petitioner
also moved before the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur
who has directed the District Magistrate to take action
considering the claim of the petitioner. Counsel further submits
that it is the decision of the State Government by way of a
policy to provide the land to every homeless person acquiring
the private land where no government land is available.
4. In the light of the said policy, the petitioner seeks
direction from this Court that a direction may be given to the
State.
5. Learned counsel for the State submits that
counter affidavit has been filed in this case. In the counter
affidavit the stand of the State is very clear that petitioner is not
comes under the category for which the benefit has to be
provided. According to the counter affidavit petitioner is neither
homeless nor landless person. It has been submitted that
petitioner is an employee and working as Home Guard Jawan as Patna High Court CWJC No.10611 of 2015 dt.01-08-2023
per the report dated 02.11.2015 submitted by Rajasv
Karamchari, which is annexed as Annexure- A to the counter
affidavit.
6. In this background petitioner is neither a
homeless person nor he is a resident of Jagdishpur Gram
Panchayat rather he possess a home in Bhawanipur Deshari.
Therefore, petitioner is not come within the purview of the
policy of the State Government and in the light of the counter
affidavit, he cannot be treated as homeless and landless person.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date 03.08.2023 Transmission Date N.A.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!