Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tara @ Tara Devi vs The State Of Bihar, Through The ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 2588 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2588 Patna
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2022

Patna High Court
Tara @ Tara Devi vs The State Of Bihar, Through The ... on 9 May, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 17214 of 2021
      ======================================================

Tara @ Tara Devi Wife of Shivji Yadav Resident of Village - Rampur, P.S. Jadopur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Co- operative, Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Co-operative Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Co-operative Officer, Gopalganj.

5. The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Block - Gopalganj, Sadar, Gopalganj.

6. Yashoda Devi Wife of Narayan Yadav Resident of Village Semrahi, Police Station - Jadopur, District- Gopalganj.

7. Master Yadav Son of Narayan Yadav Resident of Village Semrahi, Police Station- Jadopur, District- Gopalganj.

8. Rita Devi Wife of Master Yadav Resident of Village Semrahi, Police Station-

Jadopur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Uday Shankar Saran Singh, GP XIX ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

(Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH)

Date : 09-05-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

respondents.

2 The District Cooperative Officer, Gopalganj, in

exercise of power under Section 41 (iv) of the Bihar Cooperative

Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), 1935, has Patna High Court CWJC No.17214 of 2021 dt.09-05-2022

dissolved Rampur Tengrahi Primary Agriculture Credit Society

(for brevity, PACS) under Gopalganj Sadar Block in the district of

Gopalganj by order dated 16.08.2021 issued under Memo No 932

on the ground of there being stalemate in the

constitution/functioning of the Board of the said PACS. After

having dissolved the Executive Committee of the said PACS, an

Administrator has been appointed in exercise of power under

Section 14 (10) of the Act by an order of the same date, i e,

16.08.2021, issued under Memo No 933.

3 The said orders are under challenge in the present writ

application, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

has attempted to persuade this Court that the District Cooperative

Officer, Gopalganj had accepted resignation of some of the

Members of the Executive Committee though it was not

permissible for him to do so.

5 We are not inclined, however, to interfere in the

present matter for two reasons. Firstly, the impugned orders dated

16.08.2021, issued under Memo No 932 and 933 respectively,

were operative for six months only from the date of their issuance,

as is evident from the statutory provision, as contained in Clause

(iv) of sub-section (1) of Section 41 of the Act.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17214 of 2021 dt.09-05-2022

6 In the order issued by Memo No 933 dated

16.08.2021, whereby the Administrator has been appointed, it has

been specifically mentioned that the appointment shall be for a

term of six months from the date of issuance of the said order.

7 There is no disclosure in the pleadings on behalf of the

petitioner regarding development after issuance of the said orders,

issued by Memo No 932 and 933, both dated 16.08.2021.

8 Secondly, if the petitioner was aggrieved by the said

orders dated 16.08.2021, she had remedy of appeal before the

appellate authority under Section 41 (vi) of the Act, which she did

not avail.

9 In any view of the matter, in our opinion, this matter

does not require interference by this Court, in the above noted

facts and circumstances.

10 This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                    NA
Uploading Date          11.05.2022
Transmission Date           NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter