Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manisha Kumari @ Manisha Devi vs The State Of Bihar
2022 Latest Caselaw 1180 Patna

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1180 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022

Patna High Court
Manisha Kumari @ Manisha Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 16 February, 2022
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9241 of 2021
     ======================================================

Manisha Kumari @ Manisha Devi W/o Santosh Chaudhary, R/V- Siswa Sareya, Ward No. 9, Panchayat- Raj - Siswa Sareya, P.O. - Ojhawaliya, P.S. - Bairia District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Secretary Social Welfare Department, Patna, Bihar.

2. The Collector, Bettiah, West Champaran.

3. The Director, ICDS, Bettiah West Champaran.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

5. The District Programme Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

6. The Child Development Project Officer, Bairia West Champaran.

7. The Ward Member, Ward No. 09, Panchayat Raj Siswa Sareya Bettiah, West Champaran.

8. Kajal Kumari Vinod Kumar, R/V Siswa Sareya, Panchayat Raj - Siswa Sareya, P.O. - Ojhwaliya, P.S. Bairia, Ward No. 09, West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-02-2022

The matter has been heard via video conferencing

due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19

pandemic.

Learned counsel for the State accepts notice for

respondent nos. 1 to 7.

Service of notice to respondent no.8-Kajal Kumari

is dispensed since no adverse order is passed against her.

In the instant petition petitioner has prayed for the Patna High Court CWJC No.9241 of 2021 dt.16-02-2022

following relief/reliefs:

"(i) For issuance of the writ in

the nature of the mandamus directing

the respondents to recount the

Aanganbari Centre No. 174 was

wrongly declared as the majority of

Backward Case which is itself

irregularity in preparation of maping

panzi on the basis of which the

selection of the private respondent

was made illegally.

(ii) For issuance of other

direction to the respondent to stay the

further processes of the selected

private respondent unless or until the

present case of the petitioner finally

disposed of.

(iii) For issuance of any other

direction to the respondents to make

fresh selection of Aanganbari Centre

No. 174.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9241 of 2021 dt.16-02-2022

(iv) For issuance of direction to

the respondent to select the petitioner

by cancelling the selection of private

respondent because she was at serial

no.2 in merit list.

(v) For issuance of other

relief/relieves for which the petitioner

is entitled in the eye of law."

The petitioner has already approached the District

Collector on 16.12.2020, therefore, the District Collector is

hereby directed to decide the petitioner's representation dated

16.12.2020 after hearing respondent no.8-Kajal Kumari within a

period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.

With the above observation, writ petition stands

disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Ankit/-

AFR/NAFR                         NAFR
CAV DATE                          NA
Uploading Date                23.02.2022
Transmission Date                 NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter