Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4393 Patna
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11232 of 2022
======================================================
M/s Oasis Creative Construction Pvt. Ltd. 203, Baidyanath Place, Jagdeo Path, Bailey Road, Patna - 800014 through its Managing Director Sri Manoj Kumar Mehta, Aged about 45 Years, Gender Male, Son of Shiv Narayan Mehta, Resident of Village Kamalpur, P.S.- Kunauli, District Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Commissioner of State Taxes (Appeals), Patna West Division, Patna.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Danapur Circle, Danapur, District Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Dr. K.N. Singh, ASG Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. SC., CGST & CX For the State : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Date : 10-08-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
" (i) For issuance of consequential writ or order for quashing of order dated 14.03.2022 issued vide Memo No. 4492 dated 14.03.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, State Tax (Appeals), Patna West Division, Patna whereby the Tax, Interest and Penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer has been confirmed;
Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
(ii) For further issuance of consequential writ or order for quashing of unseasoned orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Danapur Circle, District Patna imposed Tax, Interest and Penalty utilizing the power under Section 74(9) of the CGST/BGST Act, 2017 and the Demand Notice in Form GST DRC-07 dated 07 03 2020 has been issued;
(iii) For further issuance of a direction or order restraining the respondents from taking coercive action for recovery of the amount in demand from the petitioner during the pendency of the present writ petition or for a direction to refund of the part or whole of the amount in case recovered from the Petitioner;
(iv) For grant of any relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."
Petitioner has prayed for quashing of the impugned
orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax,
Danapur Circle, District Patna under Section 74(9) of the
CGST/BGST Act, 2017 (Annexure-1 series); Summary of
the orders in Form GST DRC-07 dated 07.03.2020 in
Reference Nos. ZA10032001D950J, ZA100320010931J,
ZA100320010962E, ZA1003200109690,
ZA1003200109781, ZA100320010991D respectively
(Annexure-2 series) and orders dated 14.03.2022, issued
vide Memo No. 4492 passed by the Additional Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
Commissioner, State Tax (Appeals), Patna West Division,
Patna in Appeal Case Nos. G.S.T./D.N.- 01/2020-21,
G.S.T./D.N.- 02/2020-21, G.S.T./D.N.- 03/2020-21,
G.S.T./D.N.- 04/2020-21, G.S.T./D.N.- 05/2020-21 and
G.S.T./D.N.- 06/2020-21 respectively (Annexure-3).
Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has
no objection if the matter is remanded to the Assessing
Authority for deciding the case afresh. Also, the case shall
be decided on merits. Also, during pendency of the case,
no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
Statement accepted and taken on record.
However, having heard learned counsel for the parties
as also perused the record made available, we are of the
considered view that this Court, notwithstanding the statutory
remedy, is not precluded from interfering where, ex facie, we
form an opinion that the order is bad in law. This we say so,
for two reasons- (a) violation of principles of natural justice,
i.e. Fair opportunity of hearing. No sufficient time was
afforded to the petitioner to represent his case; (b) order passed
ex parte in nature, does not assign any reasons sufficient even
decipherable from the record, as to how the officer could
determine the amount due and payable by the assessee. The Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
order, ex parte in nature, passed in violation of the principles
of natural justice, entails civil consequences. We also find the
authorities not to have adjudicated the matter on the attending
facts and circumstances. All issues of fact and law ought to
have been dealt with, even if the proceedings were to be ex
parte in nature.
As such, we dispose of the present writ petition in the
following mutually agreeable terms:
(a) We quash and set aside the impugned orders
passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Danapur
Circle, District Patna under Section 74(9) of the
CGST/BGST Act, 2017 (Annexure-1 series); Summary of
the orders in Form GST DRC-07 dated 07.03.2020 in
Reference Nos. ZA10032001D950J, ZA100320010931J,
ZA100320010962E, ZA1003200109690,
ZA1003200109781, ZA100320010991D respectively
(Annexure-2 series) and orders dated 14.03.2022, issued
vide Memo No. 4492 passed by the Additional
Commissioner, State Tax (Appeals), Patna West Division,
Patna in Appeal Case Nos. G.S.T./D.N.- 01/2020-21,
G.S.T./D.N.- 02/2020-21, G.S.T./D.N.- 03/2020-21,
G.S.T./D.N.- 04/2020-21, G.S.T./D.N.- 05/2020-21 and Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
G.S.T./D.N.- 06/2020-21 respectively (Annexure-3);
(b) We accept the statement of the petitioner that
ten per cent of the total amount, being condition
prerequisite for hearing of the appeal, already stands
deposited. If that were so, well and good. However, if the
amount is not deposited for whatever reason(s), same shall
be done before the next date;
(c) Further the petitioner undertakes to additionally
deposit ten per cent of the amount of the demand raised
before the Assessing Officer. This shall be done within four
weeks;
(d) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the
respective rights and contention of the parties and
subject to the order passed by the Assessing Officer.
However, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner's
deposit is in excess, the same shall be refunded within
two months from the date of passing of the order;
(e) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of
the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in
reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present
petition. This shall be done immediately; Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
(f) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the
Assessing Authority on 12th of September, 2022 at 10:30
A.M., if possible through digital mode;
(g) The Assessing Authority shall decide the
case on merits after complying with the principles of
natural justice;
(h) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to
the parties to place on record all essential documents
and materials, if so required and desired;
(i) During pendency of the case, no coercive
steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
(j) The Assessing Authority shall pass a fresh
order only after affording adequate opportunity to all
concerned, including the writ petitioner;
(k) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to
fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take
unnecessary adjournment;
(l) The Assessing Authority shall decide the case on
merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two
months from the date of appearance of the petitioner;
(m) The Assessing Authority shall pass a speaking Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
order assigning reasons, copy whereof shall be supplied to
the parties;
(n) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge
the order, if required and desired;
(o) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take
recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available
in accordance with law;
(p) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner
takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate
forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with
law, with a reasonable dispatch;
(q) We have not expressed any opinion on merits
and all issues are left open;
(r) If possible, proceedings during the time of
current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through
digital mode;
The instant petition stands disposed of in the
aforesaid terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, stands
disposed of.
Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes Patna High Court CWJC No.11232 of 2022 dt.10-08-2022
to communicate the order to the appropriate authority
through electronic mode.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajiv-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!